Perhaps, but would you rather that Carrier continue to manufacture higher-cost products that it cannot sell since it is no longer competitive?
Rather than either Mexico or higher-cost manufacturing in the US as options, we should be automating production at home - which will diminish jobs but at least keep some manufacturing in the US.
At the same time, let's start educating our workforce with higher skill/competency levels so they don't have to look for lower-salary, wrote manufacturing jobs. Have we not learned anything from the debacle in the Automotive Industry, where Detroit is figuratively now a Ghost Town?
See the breakdown by industrial sector in this chart:
GDP by industry. We are already a nation that obtains more GDP from Real Estate/Renting/Leasing, Federal & State Government, Finance/Insurance, Health/Social Care together (25% of the total) than from both Durable and Non-Durable Manufacturing (12%). Whilst construction adds another 4%, it is not about to take off to either Mexico or China.
And of those upper-class "industries" most of them are in services and not manufacturing. (The iPhones we love so much are developed in the US, but made in China. We cannot undo that trend in certain product sectors - though we'll like keep some Heavy Manufacturing (trucks, heavy equipment) in the US, solely because transportation costs from elsewhere makes them expensive. But it does not prevent the Japanese from competing in this sector.
We are beating a dead-horse. Let's save what we can of it by incorporating (tax-deductible) automated production-techniques, thus keeping whatever manufacturing we can. And I'll bet, wherever possible, manufacturing companies are doing just that.
So why not Carrier ... ?!?