| Re: discussion: 128shot vs hipsterdufus - Violence of Islam hippy d presented his arguement in a more pragmatic way. And it had more of a logical flow to it. However, I don't agree with his conclusion's. I only voted for him because his arguement was more clearly stated. I certainly do not think Islam is a violent religion. But then, I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed either.
If he had debated TOT, with TOT being forced to defend Islam.......
........what was that?................Oh my God, TOT has fallen down and he can't get up!................TOT..............TOT........... ....somebody call a doctor!
TOT, I'm sorry, you don't have to defend Islam! I was only joking!
TOT...............TOT.................wake up, TOT!
aaaaah, s.hit!
__________________ "With neocons, it just goes to show, when the
bar is low enough, you can never be too wrong!" |