Caine

Im opening this thread so that we can discuss and vote for who won the true debate between Jallman and Billo_Really.

__________________
I voted for Bob Barr.

Billo_Really

I think jallman's argument was pretty huge. Not as big as his feet. But huge, just as well.

__________________

"With neocons, it just goes to show, when the
bar is low enough, you can never be too wrong!"

jallman

I think for arguing a side of the fence that you didn't agree with, that you did a damned good job. I'm still voting for myself though.

__________________
http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/d...amaSigcopy.jpg

ARealConservative

I felt Jallman presented the stronger argument.

Felicity

It's hard to say...both did a really excellent job, AND both fell into the emotional appeal sandtrap...I think I have to vote for jallman because his summary post was more astute. Still, Billo, you did very well--I think you could have gone further concerning the issue of what ACTUALLY shows scientific promise, and you could have offered other angles concerning scientific ethics--but in such a limited time frame/# of posts, you both were pretty awesome.




However...the poll is closed and my vote has been disenfranchised!!!!!!

__________________
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
While I thought that I was learning how to live, I have been learning how to die. ~*Leonardo Da Vinci*~