debate 6 discussion. final debate - Page 9

galenrox · 05-25-06, 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus

Did you even read it? I have a plan that will unite everyone.

Yes I did read it, and I thought your arguments were strong. Yet Indy's arguments were also very strong, and what it eventually came down to was Indy's answers were more relevent to the questions than yours, in general.

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-25-06, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galenrox

I voted for Indy also, but I do have to question, are you talking about his posts not being relevent to the question or his posts "not finding the truth" in the sense that they inevitably wouldn't, since your perception of the truth is different from his?

Both of you are indocrinated, spare the man who disagrees ****. Global warming, the sky is falling, just listen to algore he'll tell you the truth.

Reason means nothing to the irrational.

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-25-06, 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galenrox

Yes I did read it, and I thought your arguments were strong. Yet Indy's arguments were also very strong, and what it eventually came down to was Indy's answers were more relevent to the questions than yours, in general.

Much offense, but you may be right, two questions though, did he prove causation between human activity and global warming and did he present a viable alternative to fossil fuels? I did the latter.

tecoyah · 05-25-06, 05:23 AM

Attempting to sway the vote process is certainly no indication of confidence in success.

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-25-06, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tecoyah

Attempting to sway the vote process is certainly no indication of confidence in success.

Why not, they admitted in this discussion that they were voting according to their inate bias ie the indoctrination brought on by the new left lobbiests. Really I don't give a f@ck about the outcome so long as people know that the whole global warming thing isn't as cut and dry as the propagandists lead us to believe.

tecoyah · 05-25-06, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus

Why not, they admitted in this discussion that they were voting according to their inate bias ie the indoctrination brought on by the new left lobbiests. Really I don't give a f@ck about the outcome so long as people know that the whole global warming thing isn't as cut and dry as the propagandists lead us to believe.

.....well....OK then..............

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-25-06, 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by independent_thinker2002

Sir, have you no respect for the integrity of the debate? You have been badgering people in the comments threads for these debates. I shouldn't have to debate you in more than one forum. Judges also shouldn't have to debate you. Whether it is your intention or not, you are affecting participation in these debates. Imagine if people were campaigning at polling places. It would harm the integrity of the election.

You did this in your debate with Billo and now with me. You even had a mod tell you that you shouldn't be participating in the comments thread. Your attempt at getting extra talking points in outside of the debate is unethical. Now you want to chide the judges when they express their opinions. You want to demonize anyone who votes for your opponents. This extra campaigning is beneath what a "True Debate" is supposed to be. I would love to address those who voted against me. I don't because it would hurt the integrity of the debate itself. There will be time to do this once a decision has been made and a winner declared. This is supposed to be "True Debates".

Integrity of the debate? Que? Oh so I'm supposed to just sit still while some body just starts another debate on the topic of which I am arguing and goes about making up his own facts in an attempt to garner public opinion? Who argued against you sir? Please show me someone giving a counterpoint to your opinion. In every debate I've been in I have had someone arguing against my points outside of the debate, can you say the same? If you don't want me to present counter arguments to people outside of the original debate, then perhaps people should stop starting them. Particularly I don't give a f@ck you had no argument, you had no solution, and on every side note I handed you your *** ie I took your source and used it against you. Your only counter was an ad-hominem.

Speaking of Billo where you at? You still haven't responded to the discussion forum in which you confronted me in after the debate. Wanna know why Independent? Cuz he was outmatched and had no response that's why. Truthout propaganda couldn't stand up against reality.

Billo just like you can't hang:

Quote:

Originally Posted by billo

My dear esteemed former debate opponant, my point was never about power output. It was about the average Iraqi citizen receiving the power. I can post just as many sources as you can contradicting your assertions on power output. I can post just as many sources that corroborate your position on power output. But you haven't posted one source on the transmission of that power or on the average Iraq receiving more power now than before.

It doesn't matter how much power you put out if you can't distribute it to the end user. You have to have a closed-loop!

Quote:

Originally Posted by thy lord your god

No sir you bolded the parts in the article presented dealing with the overall output not the amount of power recieved by the Iraqi citizenry after the war. I really wish you would, but I posted the amount of electricity consumed by the Iraqi citizenry prior to the war . . . Baghdad Sunni's recieved 24 hour service and the rest of Iraq was relegated to 3-4 hours of sporatic electricity. Shi'ites in the south and the Kurds in the north were deprived services to keep them in line. The U.S. has not only increased electrical output and consumption but we have distributed it more equitably.

Billo has no comeback this one has sat there for the last couple of weeks with no response.

I never said I wasn't a dick.

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-25-06, 09:08 AM

all right I concede the vote is in, you dumb bastards wouldn't know truth if it bit you in the ***.

Congrats Indy.

FallingPianos · 05-25-06, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus

all right I concede the vote is in, you dumb bastards wouldn't know truth if it bit you in the ***.

Congrats Indy.

dont congrats yet. I voted for you, and my vote counts as a third of the total judgement.

galenrox · 05-25-06, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus

Both of you are indocrinated, spare the man who disagrees ****. Global warming, the sky is falling, just listen to algore he'll tell you the truth.

Reason means nothing to the irrational.

lol, obviously, cause you know, I really have opinions when it comes to global warming. No really, I do!