debate 6 discussion. final debate - Page 8

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-22-06, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfuh

Fine then, put your money where your mouth is. I cite nature and Science as my sources. Go ahead and show me a peer review article that says, as per your claim, that they are:

Plz also show of the financial incentives as well as identify the party to which nature and Science tow the lines of.
Take your time with this.

And this just proves my theory that you didn't even follow the debate but only voted according to your own personnel bias here ya go:

'Global Warming': An Official PseudoScience

jfuh · 05-22-06, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus

And this just proves my theory that you didn't even follow the debate but only voted according to your own personnel bias here ya go:

'Global Warming': An Official PseudoScience

I thought you had a peer review article. This is nothing of the sort.

First: This is a self publication, not peer review - as per your claim.

Secondly: Did you bother to read this book? The author does not deny antrhopogenic causes of global warming, in fact he stands by it. His argumet is mainly focused on the medial hype over global warming and not the science itself.

hipsterdufus · 05-24-06, 02:44 PM

tot does a very good job debating his uninformed positions.

For me, that's not what it's about. It's about getting to the truth.

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-24-06, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipsterdufus

tot does a very good job debating his uninformed positions.

For me, that's not what it's about. It's about getting to the truth.

So you voted according to your own personnel bias I take it.

independent_thinker2002 · 05-24-06, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus

So you voted according to your own personnel bias I take it.

Sir, have you no respect for the integrity of the debate? You have been badgering people in the comments threads for these debates. I shouldn't have to debate you in more than one forum. Judges also shouldn't have to debate you. Whether it is your intention or not, you are affecting participation in these debates. Imagine if people were campaigning at polling places. It would harm the integrity of the election.

You did this in your debate with Billo and now with me. You even had a mod tell you that you shouldn't be participating in the comments thread. Your attempt at getting extra talking points in outside of the debate is unethical. Now you want to chide the judges when they express their opinions. You want to demonize anyone who votes for your opponents. This extra campaigning is beneath what a "True Debate" is supposed to be. I would love to address those who voted against me. I don't because it would hurt the integrity of the debate itself. There will be time to do this once a decision has been made and a winner declared. This is supposed to be "True Debates".

jallman · 05-24-06, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by independent_thinker2002

Sir, have you no respect for the integrity of the debate? You have been badgering people in the comments threads for these debates. I shouldn't have to debate you in more than one forum. Judges also shouldn't have to debate you. Whether it is your intention or not, you are affecting participation in these debates. Imagine if people were campaigning at polling places. It would harm the integrity of the election.

You did this in your debate with Billo and now with me. You even had a mod tell you that you shouldn't be participating in the comments thread. Your attempt at getting extra talking points in outside of the debate is unethical. Now you want to chide the judges when they express their opinions. You want to demonize anyone who votes for your opponents. This extra campaigning is beneath what a "True Debate" is supposed to be. I would love to address those who voted against me. I don't because it would hurt the integrity of the debate itself. There will be time to do this once a decision has been made and a winner declared. This is supposed to be "True Debates".

well said...very well said.

FallingPianos · 05-24-06, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by independent_thinker2002

Sir, have you no respect for the integrity of the debate? You have been badgering people in the comments threads for these debates. I shouldn't have to debate you in more than one forum. Judges also shouldn't have to debate you. Whether it is your intention or not, you are affecting participation in these debates. Imagine if people were campaigning at polling places. It would harm the integrity of the election.

You did this in your debate with Billo and now with me. You even had a mod tell you that you shouldn't be participating in the comments thread. Your attempt at getting extra talking points in outside of the debate is unethical. Now you want to chide the judges when they express their opinions. You want to demonize anyone who votes for your opponents. This extra campaigning is beneath what a "True Debate" is supposed to be. I would love to address those who voted against me. I don't because it would hurt the integrity of the debate itself. There will be time to do this once a decision has been made and a winner declared. This is supposed to be "True Debates".

just so you know, I havent read that thread with jfuh, nor did I look at this one until after making my decision.

I agree with you completely, and will push for prohibiting competitors from posting in the discussion threads. you might send a PM to tecoyah as well.

galenrox · 05-24-06, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipsterdufus

tot does a very good job debating his uninformed positions.

For me, that's not what it's about. It's about getting to the truth.

I voted for Indy also, but I do have to question, are you talking about his posts not being relevent to the question or his posts "not finding the truth" in the sense that they inevitably wouldn't, since your perception of the truth is different from his?

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-25-06, 01:40 AM

You're both under the doctrine of propoganda, some of the worst things ever were started with the best of intentions.

by the by my sig is a joke, nex ut tyranuss licentia vel nex. I like the fake quote though, I got it off the D.U. and found it fitting.

Trajan Octavian Titus · 05-25-06, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galenrox

I voted for Indy also, but I do have to question, are you talking about his posts not being relevent to the question or his posts "not finding the truth" in the sense that they inevitably wouldn't, since your perception of the truth is different from his?

Did you even read it? I have a plan that will unite everyone.