• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Not scheduled on the arrival boards....planes of 9/11

creativedreams

creativedreams

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
2,730
Reaction score
239
Location
Timbuktu
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Planes used on 9/11 were not even scheduled on the arrival boards for their destinations....

 
What happened to the people that were on those scheduled flights?
 
Not sure....just thought this was creepy and on the news....
 
creativedreams said:
You responded exactly like I suspected with a low I.Q. where all the indisputable information just floats right over your head....
Click to expand...

And as usual you responded with one of your unimaginative "stock" phrases ... are you really so banal and pedestrian that you can only respond with the same few quips ???

Hardly the mark of the genuine intellectual you consider yourself to be ... to be so bland and clichéd with every post you make ... is it now ???
 
I_Gaze_At_The_Blue said:
And as usual you responded with one of your unimaginative "stock" phrases ... are you really so banal and pedestrian that you can only respond with the same few quips ???

Hardly the mark of the genuine intellectual you consider yourself to be ... to be so bland and clichéd with every post you make ... is it now ???
Click to expand...

I take it you are intellectual and clever then? Quips?
 
creativedreams said:
You responded exactly like I suspected with a low I.Q. where all the indisputable information just floats right over your head....
Click to expand...

What do you expect, he is from Phily...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 505
I_Gaze_At_The_Blue said:
And as usual you responded with one of your unimaginative "stock" phrases ... are you really so banal and pedestrian that you can only respond with the same few quips ???

Hardly the mark of the genuine intellectual you consider yourself to be ... to be so bland and clichéd with every post you make ... is it now ???
Click to expand...

Nothing new there.
 
Videos like this are exactly what makes me think that most truthers are complete morons.

Reporter: "Their numbers were not even on the arrivals board here... no one had begun to come here to pick up passengers that were arriving from those 3 destinations."

911 Truth f***tard: "OMGZ the planes weren't SCHEDULED on the arrival boards? CONSPIRACY!!!!... Oh... but... I'm just asking questions and thought it was interesting."

Reality:

1. It takes awhile to fly from east coast to west coast.
2. Arrival boards don't show incoming flights several hours in advance.
3. The planes crashed relatively quickly after takeoff.

When taking these 3 key things into account, any rational person can come to the conclusion that the reporter was NOT saying that the planes were NOT SCHEDULED. He was saying that the planes crashed BEFORE they were on the arrival boards, and BEFORE people had begun to show up to pick up passengers.

Yet another CD failthread.
 
505 said:
Videos like this are exactly what makes me think that most truthers are complete morons.

Reporter: "Their numbers were not even on the arrivals board here... no one had begun to come here to pick up passengers that were arriving from those 3 destinations."

911 Truth f***tard: "OMGZ the planes weren't SCHEDULED on the arrival boards? CONSPIRACY!!!!... Oh... but... I'm just asking questions and thought it was interesting."

Reality:

1. It takes awhile to fly from east coast to west coast.
2. Arrival boards don't show incoming flights several hours in advance.
3. The planes crashed relatively quickly after takeoff.

When taking these 3 key things into account, any rational person can come to the conclusion that the reporter was NOT saying that the planes were NOT SCHEDULED. He was saying that the planes crashed BEFORE they were on the arrival boards, and BEFORE people had begun to show up to pick up passengers.

Yet another CD failthread.
Click to expand...

How dare you thorw something as immaterial as facts into the discussion! For Shame!
 
Moderator's Warning:
No more in-thread personal innuendo.
 
505 said:
Videos like this are exactly what makes me think that most truthers are complete morons.

Reporter: "Their numbers were not even on the arrivals board here... no one had begun to come here to pick up passengers that were arriving from those 3 destinations."

911 Truth f***tard: "OMGZ the planes weren't SCHEDULED on the arrival boards? CONSPIRACY!!!!... Oh... but... I'm just asking questions and thought it was interesting."

Reality:

1. It takes awhile to fly from east coast to west coast.
2. Arrival boards don't show incoming flights several hours in advance.
3. The planes crashed relatively quickly after takeoff.

When taking these 3 key things into account, any rational person can come to the conclusion that the reporter was NOT saying that the planes were NOT SCHEDULED. He was saying that the planes crashed BEFORE they were on the arrival boards, and BEFORE people had begun to show up to pick up passengers.

Yet another CD failthread.
Click to expand...

Excellent.

And the funny thing is that the self-righteous so-and-so will and has proclaimed the deterioration of the US as has B-"man", Pull My Finger, DOL, etc... Yet they make no apologies for wrongly accusing the scores of persons they label as traitors day in and day out. Any deterioration is rooted in such despecable actions. But they will never apologize; just roll on to the next lie they want to tell.
 
505 said:
Videos like this are exactly what makes me think that most truthers are complete morons.
Click to expand...

I was starting to think the same of the rest, but at least the saving grace is that you offered a legitimate explanation.

Reporter: "Their numbers were not even on the arrivals board here... no one had begun to come here to pick up passengers that were arriving from those 3 destinations."

911 Truth f***tard: "OMGZ the planes weren't SCHEDULED on the arrival boards? CONSPIRACY!!!!... Oh... but... I'm just asking questions and thought it was interesting."

Reality:

1. It takes awhile to fly from east coast to west coast.
2. Arrival boards don't show incoming flights several hours in advance.
3. The planes crashed relatively quickly after takeoff.
Click to expand...

You are probably right here...

When taking these 3 key things into account, any rational person can come to the conclusion that the reporter was NOT saying that the planes were NOT SCHEDULED. He was saying that the planes crashed BEFORE they were on the arrival boards, and BEFORE people had begun to show up to pick up passengers.

Yet another CD failthread.
Click to expand...

Now, I'm not any sort of expert on airport procedures, so this is hardly definitive, but I remember seeing departures and arrivals on the board last time I took a plane that went out several hours (5-6 hours down the line), including the status of those planes (with arrived @, delayed, expected @, etc filling the appropriate slots).

So, IMO, this really depends on the timing of when this reporter was doing his report... the earlier before the expected arrival time of these flights the more your point stands. If this report was filmed in the minutes before the plane was about to hit then it does look suspicious... I mean, in the chaos, it may not have been known by the people who were supposed to pick people up from their flights that those were the flights that were hijacked, etc...

So, while I'm not viewing this as proof that the planes were not scheduled to arrive, because there's not enough information to run with... it's not something that can necessarily be brushed aside either... but unfortunately, I doubt that there's any other specifics to go on that would make this clip definitive one way or the other.

(BTW, your opinions and suggestions make sense, they are not definitive or proof either way)
 
which is more plausible:

1. The flights never existed and the whole thing was part of a coverup

2. The airlines simply removed the flights from the arrival/departure boards once they crashed
 
usda select said:
Excellent.

And the funny thing is that the self-righteous so-and-so will and has proclaimed the deterioration of the US as has B-"man", Pull My Finger, DOL, etc...
Click to expand...

That people like yourself would refuse to look at the facts is hardly my problem... but the US IS deteriorating and is getting close to a point where it could very well collapse completely... at the VERY LEAST, the US's status as the source of the world reserve currency... that at the very least is coming to an end... and probably sooner rather then later (meaning probably within 1-2 years not 10-20)

Yet they make no apologies for wrongly accusing the scores of persons they label as traitors day in and day out.
Click to expand...

Ya, I have no qualms about rebuking those corrupt individuals that had clearly been involved in shadiness... regardless of what that shadiness was specifically regarding.

Any deterioration is rooted in such despecable actions.
Click to expand...

Oh, I get it... it's not the rape of a person that would be the problem... the problem would be that the person report such a crime and attempt to seek out justice...

*applause* I bet you hadn't thought your position through, so I'll let that one slide.

But they will never apologize; just roll on to the next lie they want to tell.
Click to expand...

Just because you prefer to live in denial of reality doesn't mean that people pointing out your denials are lying.
 
OscarB63 said:
which is more plausible:

1. The flights never existed and the whole thing was part of a coverup
Click to expand...

Operation Northwoods suggests this would be the likely action taken if this was an 'inside job'

2. The airlines simply removed the flights from the arrival/departure boards once they crashed
Click to expand...

That's possible, though in the confusion I'm not completely certain that it would have been clearly known which specific planes had crashed... a slightly more likely 3.

3 - That once the chaos started in the skies and this became known that the airlines had ceased adjusting the arrival boards because of a lack of verifiable information... which could have also been affected by the time when all air traffic was grounded...
 
All of the four flights are divisible by important masonic numbers: 3,7,9,11,13,33,39

Flight 175 / 7
Flight 77 / 7
Flight 93 / 3
Flight 11 / 11

Another smoking gun, but yet gets ignored in the media:shock:
 
BmanMcfly said:
That people like yourself would refuse to look at the facts is hardly my problem... but the US IS deteriorating and is getting close to a point where it could very well collapse completely... at the VERY LEAST, the US's status as the source of the world reserve currency... that at the very least is coming to an end... and probably sooner rather then later (meaning probably within 1-2 years not 10-20)
Click to expand...
The facts have been examined over and over. You're simply here to throw garbage against the wall and see if it sticks. When it doesn't, you just throw more trash. Its your only ploy.

Ya, I have no qualms about rebuking those corrupt individuals that had clearly been involved in shadiness... regardless of what that shadiness was specifically regarding.
Click to expand...

You accuse people of mass murder.

Oh, I get it... it's not the rape of a person that would be the problem... the problem would be that the person report such a crime and attempt to seek out justice...
Click to expand...
The 19 hijackers were the mass murderers. Not once have you called them that.



Just because you prefer to live in denial of reality doesn't mean that people pointing out your denials are lying.
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]

Whatever. 19 hijackers hijacked four aircraft and crashed them into 3 buildings. And because the airlines removed them from the boards, you're shouting conspiracy like a lunatic. Reality is where it always is, firmly on my side. Sorry; it will always be the case and no amount of crass commentary from you will change it.

Can't help that I'm smarter than you.
 
usda select said:
The facts have been examined over and over. You're simply here to throw garbage against the wall and see if it sticks. When it doesn't, you just throw more trash. Its your only ploy.
Click to expand...

Your willing ignorance of specific evidence that flies in the face of the official version is not really my concern... the evidence speaks for itself.

You accuse people of mass murder.
Click to expand...
Well... the evidence points to there being a level of an inside job... and when you ask simple questions like 'who benefits?' the answers never really point to afghanistan, or bin laden.... So, I just point out the controversies and if you're going to call it all the result of 'coincidence', well, then you have to consider the odds of ALL these 'errors' happening simultaneously and in tandem by chance.... the odds are astronomical.

The 19 hijackers were the mass murderers. Not once have you called them that.
Click to expand...

I have never disputed that either... there's the possibility that the planes were taken by remote control, if you read operation northwoods.


Whatever. 19 hijackers hijacked four aircraft and crashed them into 3 buildings. And because the airlines removed them from the boards, you're shouting conspiracy like a lunatic. Reality is where it always is, firmly on my side. Sorry; it will always be the case and no amount of crass commentary from you will change it.
Click to expand...

Right, but the FBI had an informant LIVING WITH the hijackers prior to 9-11, the Mossad had agents 'documenting the event', among countless other anomolies are part of the public record....

Can't help that I'm smarter than you.
Click to expand...

Smart is not the result of your capacity to deny information.
 
BmanMcfly said:
Right, but the FBI had an informant LIVING WITH the hijackers prior to 9-11, the Mossad had agents 'documenting the event', among countless other anomolies are part of the public record....
Click to expand...

Don't suppose you can show us those public records. And while I think its smart to ask who benefits, Its also smart to figure out how the suspect defines a "benefit" because it may not be the same way you do.
 
I have never disputed that either... there's the possibility that the planes were taken by remote control, if you read operation northwoods.
Click to expand...

Was Operation Northwoods ever official government policy? No. Not anywhere close. It was a plan developed as a means to an end. Thats all. Because it fits into some bastardized anarchist scenario In your mind, it was debated by the Congress, budget scored, and then signed into law. It never came close and the person who developed it, as I recall, was dismissed soon after. It also never called for the murder of citizens as I recall. In the 1970's, there was a plan developed called "shell game" that would falsely move MX missiles from silo to silo to confuse the Soviets. Jimmy Carter called it the dumbest thing ever. It was a plan developed as a means to an end, to have our missiles survive a first strike.

Right, but the FBI had an informant LIVING WITH the hijackers prior to 9-11, the Mossad had agents 'documenting the event', among countless other anomolies are part of the public record....
Click to expand...

Does it make sense to you to involve an FBI agent and his superiors if you're the CIA?
Link to the "documenting the event"; a reputibe source please.

Smart is not the result of your capacity to deny information.
Click to expand...
Smart is knowing the difference between "could be" and likely. You do not know the difference and if it is possilbe to show the government in a negative light, you will do whatever you can to try to highlight it without examining the logic or the facts.

Somehow "could have" becomes did. "Possibly" becomes probably. It never goes the other way now does it? We have 9 years of zero evidence of an inside job. At what point will you admit you were wrong--19 years, 99 years?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom