Thread: IRS building not hit by plaine in Austin today!

Originally Posted by EnigmaO01

As hot as the fire was, and with that significant damage, it had to be an inside job by the government right?

I swear I already heard someone on TV say that the plane couldn't carry enough gas to fuel such a conflagration. That made me think along the same lines as you.

bhkad-

Despite our rocky past down in the basement, I find myself agreeing with just about every single post you make in here. Scary stuff.

Originally Posted by bhkad

I swear I already heard someone on TV say that the plane couldn't carry enough gas to fuel such a conflagration. That made me think along the same lines as you.

I heard the same. About an hour after the crash, one of the anchors was describing the scene and he said that there "MUST" have been some sort of extra incendiaries on board, because the fire was "much too big for such a small plane".

Keep in mind that the Piper PA-28 has a fuel capacity of only 48 gallons.

FORTY EIGHT. And it does this:




Forty eight US gallons plus office materials (burning for roughly an hour), made this support column sag:




Just as a comparison to put the WTC attacks in perspective, a Boeing 757 carries 11,489 gallons. That is 11,441 more gallons than the Piper PA-28.

Oh hold on sorry I forgot... all 11,489 gallons burned off instantly in the fireball, and then the fires promptly extinguished themselves.

That about right skateguy?






Meh. Those fires are nothin.

Originally Posted by bhkad

I swear I already heard someone on TV say that the plane couldn't carry enough gas to fuel such a conflagration. That made me think along the same lines as you.

Believe it or not, but I heard someone say the same thing just this morning during a news segment just this morning. I was like, "Wow! Here we go again...the conspiracy kooks will start coming out the woodwork."

Honestly, I hadn't heard of this incident until this morning. At first, I was alittle confused because the media report I was watching kept flipping back and forth from the house the husband and pilot of the single-engine plane apparently set on fire and the IRS building he crashed his plane into. The fires in both structures were burning so bad I couldn't tell which was the house and which was the IRS building. Then when they confirmed that the IRS building was engulfed in flames I was shocked! I mean, if a single-engine prop plane could do all that damage, how can one not believe that two commercial jetliners brought down the WTC buildings in the same way but on a much large scale?

A white plane was seen circling overhead. ---Also there was a report of a full Moon, in the window of the plane, just prior to impact. The entire building should be demolished, and all scrap sent to Tibet by Saturday, as to not cause an eye sore. We already know exactly what happened, and why, so no further investigation will be needed.

Originally Posted by EnigmaO01

As hot as the fire was, and with that significant damage, it had to be an inside job by the government right?

Either that or it's those Super Jews again... the Mossad.

btw... the two US Voyager space probes that have left our solar system are currently not where they should be according to Newtonian physics.

I can only surmise that this must be another conspiracy by the US government.

Damn they have a looong reach. No respect for physics either

Originally Posted by Tashah

Either that or it's those Super Jews again... the Mossad.

btw... the two US Voyager space probes that have left our solar system are currently not where they should be according to Newtonian physics.

I can only surmise that this must be another conspiracy by the US government.

Damn they have a looong reach. No respect for physics either

the super jews conspired with the US government to crash the space probes into the building to hide evidence of planning to crash the space probes into the building, and made it look like a plane crash.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gItV-ENkxPY&feature=player_embedded#"]YouTube- Witness to plane crash[/ame]

Right at the end of the witness talking she points out that firefighters and a hazmat team were 'doing something' across the street.

That almost had me concerned until a firefighter witness told the newscaster that he was 'drinking coffee' when he saw the plane hit, and described what he saw..

Finally goes on to say that he was concerned that the structural integrity of the building could be gone... since according to NIST, this building should have been ready with a demolitions cleanup crew.

You know what ACTUALLY surprises me : That I regularly, on this site, get attacked for not 'thinking about the victims'... and then with no facts, you guys come here in the wake of a tragedy and just make light of the whole incident.

I don't have all the facts, but I've seen a few news pieces that were alluding that he was a 'right wing extremist', or a 'tea party protestor'. Which, in the other thread joking about conspiracies I pointed out the process that would be used in the media to 'politically take advantage of this crisis'.... it's like Rahm Emmanuel said : "You can't let a good crisis go to waste'

Originally Posted by Objective Voice

I mean, if a single-engine prop plane could do all that damage, how can one not believe that two commercial jetliners brought down the WTC buildings in the same way but on a much large scale?

It is beyond me how most of the truthers here have zero respect for how much force those planes were carrying.

Just last week, I was sitting at a stoplight with all my windows down, and an elderly woman spaced out and hit the gas instead of the brakes as she approached. She smashed into the car directly next to me. I stayed around to give a statement, and noticed that the officers estimated her speed at roughly 30mph.

Just the shear sound of it at impact was enough to make me jump and say "holy ****". This is a ~3,000lb vehicle traveling at 30mph. Kick it up to ~70mph and make it head on, and the vehicles become literally intertwined with each other. I saw an example of this at the junkyard last month.

Now take something that is over 80 times the weight, traveling at over 20 times the speed, and there is the rough ballpark for the WTC plane impacts.

It is madness to think that the buildings were not SEVERELY compromised by the impact, further weakened by fire, and then collapsed without any further assistance.

Originally Posted by BmanMcfly

You know what ACTUALLY surprises me : That I regularly, on this site, get attacked for not 'thinking about the victims'... and then with no facts, you guys come here in the wake of a tragedy and just make light of the whole incident.

To be somewhat fair, when I made my teasing thread yesterday it was being reported that ALL building employees had been accounted for and that there were no fatalities other than the pilot. If the 911 attacks had resulted in no deaths other than the hijackers, I'm sure you'd get a free pass from all but the most anal of people.