Zionism’s Dead End

Joe Hill · 06-29-08, 05:07 AM

Students of US policy towards the rightful owners of Native American lands and their eventual "resettlement" will see the ugly anachronism that Israel and its subservient US client have become. The Cherokee's "Trail of Tears" comes to mind. They didn't resist as the Palestinians do. . .but they got no mercy anyway.

Quote:

Zionism’s dead end : Information Clearing House - ICH

Separation or ethnic cleansing? Israel’s encaging of Gaza aims to achieve both

By Jonathan Cook in Nazareth

The following is taken from a talk delivered at the Conference for the Right of Return and the Secular Democratic State, held in Haifa on June 21.

27/06/08 "ICH"' -- -- In 1895 Theodor Herzl, Zionism’s chief prophet, confided in his diary that he did not favour sharing Palestine with the natives. Better, he wrote, to “try to spirit the penniless [Palestinian] population across the border by denying it any employment in our own country … Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.”

He was proposing a programme of Palestinian emigration enforced through a policy of strict separation between Jewish immigrants and the indigenous population. In simple terms, he hoped that, once Zionist organisations had bought up large areas of Palestine and owned the main sectors of the economy, Palestinians could be made to leave by denying them rights to work the land or labour in the Jewish-run economy. His vision was one of transfer, or ethnic cleansing, through ethnic separation.

Herzl was suggesting that two possible Zionist solutions to the problem of a Palestinian majority living in Palestine -- separation and transfer -- were not necessarily alternatives but rather could be mutually reinforcing. Not only that: he believed, if they were used together, the process of ethnic cleansing could be made to appear voluntary, the choice of the victims. It may be that this was both his most enduring legacy and his major innovation to settler colonialism. . . . .

conquer · 07-05-08, 10:58 AM

Those were different decades where the international community wasn't enforcing "human rights" yet (The League of Nations was established in 1919)

For this reason. when such ideas (read your article above) were attempted to be put in practice, they simply didn't work, because the world was watching the process and the new State of Israel found itself capable to partially fulfill such strategy only.