Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Political forums > Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy Theories 9/11 being an inside job; Originally Posted by Doc Howl The impact had nothing to do with the collapse. I know that. Where the hole ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-08, 08:18 AM   #31 (permalink)
Educator

 
Chanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 11:33 PM
Posts: 1,247
Thanks: 470
Thanked 363 Times in 253 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Female

Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Howl View Post
The impact had nothing to do with the collapse.
I know that.

Quote:
Where the hole was is irrelevant.
The location of the damage causing the collapse is relevant. In order for a building to fall straight down into its own footprint at near freefall speed, the damage must be equally distributed throughout the building, and all supporting beams must fail simultaneously. NIST has yet to adequately explain the WTC7 collapse.

Quote:
Now, I have a question for the Truthers: If the building was mined, why bother with the planes?
A question for the Faith-ers: Why did the administration ignore numerous warnings about 9/11, especially when the CIA believed a terrorist attack was impending? George Tenet was described as running around with his "hair on fire," as GWB nonchalantly continued his month-long vacation.
__________________
When I despair, I remember that all through history, the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall - think of it, always.---Mahatma Gandhi
Chanda is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Inline Ads
Old 07-11-08, 01:46 PM   #32 (permalink)
blond bombshell

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 08:13 PM
Location: uk
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 263
Thanked 463 Times in 353 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sassy
Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Why cant you truthers produce a name of one person with any real notoriety and respect who backs your theorys?
__________________
The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.
mikhail is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-08, 07:32 PM   #33 (permalink)
Verifier

 
Gladiator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Online: 12-02-08 04:01 PM
Posts: 1,210
Thanks: 356
Thanked 108 Times in 85 Posts
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cloud_9
Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda View Post
A question for the Faith-ers: Why did the administration ignore numerous warnings about 9/11, especially when the CIA believed a terrorist attack was impending? George Tenet was described as running around with his "hair on fire," as GWB nonchalantly continued his month-long vacation.
Same reason Roosevledt cut off the oil to Japan before Pearl Harbor, and ordere no preemptive actions by the Military.

Bush and the neocons were looking for a reason to wage war in the Middle-East, in partiuclar agsints oil rich Iraq.

Bush was praying for a provicative actgion, and was delibverately encouraging Israel to buldoze Paslestinian settlement, to antagonize the Palestinians, to provke other Islamic radicals.

Bush may not have planted explosives in the World Trade Towers, but the Neocons sure were not about to stop any attacks by Islamic terrorists, that in any way could be linked to Iraq.


..
__________________
_______________________________
How did Our Oil get under Their Sand?
Gladiator is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-08, 07:43 PM   #34 (permalink)
Verifier

 
Gladiator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Online: 12-02-08 04:01 PM
Posts: 1,210
Thanks: 356
Thanked 108 Times in 85 Posts
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cloud_9
Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Howl View Post
The impact had nothing to do with the collapse. Where the hole was is irrelevant.

The hole from the impact on floors maybe 3 to 9, allowed air in to feed the fire. The NYFD stopped fighting the fire at Noon, and the fire burned, getting hotter, till WT7 collapsed at 5:30 PM. Had there been no impact and no hole, ther might have been less air to feed the fire, and the fire might have extinguixhed, or not burned as hot, if ther had been less air from the corner of WT7.

Molten, smoldering metal was found days after the collapse. Molten metal is not from an explosion. Moletn metal is from the beams, wrapped in 2 hour fire retardent material. The fire burned more than 2 hours and weakened the beams. Once enough beams were weak, the weight started to compound on the strongest floor, which gave way to the weight, then there was too much weight for each succssive overloaded floor. Not to mention rivits popping and welds bending.


..
Gladiator is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-08, 08:25 PM   #35 (permalink)
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 11-30-08 09:30 PM
Posts: 124
Thanks: 19
Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts

Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda View Post
The location of the damage causing the collapse is relevant. In order for a building to fall straight down into its own footprint at near freefall speed, the damage must be equally distributed throughout the building, and all supporting beams must fail simultaneously. NIST has yet to adequately explain the WTC7 collapse.
The NIST has developed an extensive theory on the collapse of WTC 7 in which the collapse of a few core columns could have initiated a global collapse. The NIST has not finalized it but it still adequately explains the collapse.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%...se%20Final.pdf
Frank Talk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Talk For This Useful Post:
Old 07-15-08, 07:13 AM   #36 (permalink)
Educator

 
Chanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 11:33 PM
Posts: 1,247
Thanks: 470
Thanked 363 Times in 253 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Female

Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Talk View Post
The NIST has not finalized it but it still adequately explains the collapse.
According to whom?
Chanda is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-08, 02:07 PM   #37 (permalink)
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 12-02-08 06:13 PM
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: 9/11 being an inside job

"Bush may not have planted explosives in the World Trade Towers, but the Neocons sure were not about to stop any attacks by Islamic terrorists, that in any way could be linked to Iraq."

Here we go again.

Fiddytree is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-08, 04:52 PM   #38 (permalink)
User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 11-30-08 09:30 PM
Posts: 124
Thanks: 19
Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts

Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda View Post
According to whom?
What part of the collapse does the NIST hypothesis not explain?
Frank Talk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-08, 06:35 PM   #39 (permalink)
Verifier

 
Gladiator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Online: 12-02-08 04:01 PM
Posts: 1,210
Thanks: 356
Thanked 108 Times in 85 Posts
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cloud_9
Re: 9/11 being an inside job

NIST report not finished.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda View Post
According to whom?
There are many questions not answered in the NIST report.

Did NYFD string any hoses to get water pressure to the fire systems of Building 7? What were the water pressures of the hoses, and how much flow into the building was there?

How much water was delivered to which floors through the sprinkler systems?

Were the generators running, and did they supply electricity to the fire pumps for he sprinkler systems? For how long did the fire pumps run? Did fir damage the electrical emergency wiring, and did breakers trip, interrupting electricity to the fire pumps?

What was the temperature of the beams on the upper floors at 5:15 PM, before the upper floors started to buckle?

What was the relative strenth of the steel beams on the upper floors at the temperautres estimated for 5:15 PM?

..

Last edited by Gladiator : 07-15-08 at 06:39 PM.
Gladiator is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-08, 06:40 PM   #40 (permalink)
Verifier

 
Gladiator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Online: 12-02-08 04:01 PM
Posts: 1,210
Thanks: 356
Thanked 108 Times in 85 Posts
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cloud_9
Re: 9/11 being an inside job

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
"Bush may not have planted explosives in the World Trade Towers, but the Neocons sure were not about to stop any attacks by Islamic terrorists, that in any way could be linked to Iraq."

Here we go again.

So Pearl Harbor was a SURPRISE attack too?

Rumsfeld gave the order to not use the Pentagon's missle defense system to shoot down the incoming airliner. Rumsfeld could have prevented the attack on the Pentagon, but he preferred to appear like a "victim."


Maybe Iran has missles, and the US Pentagon was unprotected in 2001? Maybe they fired missles at the air liner, but missed? A WWII anti-aircraft battery could have shot down that airliner.



..

Last edited by Gladiator : 07-15-08 at 06:50 PM.
Gladiator is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bill Clinton: 'I Don't Agree with Bush Investigation, But 9/11 Is Not an Inside Job' dirtyp *Breaking News* 5 04-30-08 09:52 PM
9/11, Iraq, and Bush Admin Claims Zyphlin Archives 34 03-12-08 05:58 PM
New Pal murder-bombing Shayah Archives 152 02-20-07 04:56 AM
Olmert/Abbas ceasefire agreement Tashah Archives 195 01-15-07 01:00 PM
Sword of Anger F41 Archives 40 10-06-05 06:55 AM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Jerry
· · ·
Member Galleries
1010 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO