• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent [W: 307]

Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

I would. I can make out both wings during the last three seconds or so of the video. But then I am a pilot and having spent decades reading NTSB accident reports and watching accident footage - it's an occupational hazard - I kind of am used to looking at crappy video footage.

And it is crap. The entire thing is out of focus and smacks of someone who very hurriedly pointed the camera at the scene - just like much accident footage.

It doesn't matter what you see. A plane could not have come from the west in the final seconds. The ball did.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

You really need to make it even fuzzier it still looks too much like a plane

I can make out the SOL and the barge perfectly. That proves without a doubt that flight 175 would be discernable had it really been there.

This comp was done a few years ago by a guy named Equinox. What he failed to point out was the barge, (left of tower 2) which is 150-200 feet long. The towers were 208 ft wide and a boeing 767-222 is around 168 ft. The plane would have to scale to around 80% of the towers. It is literally a dot compared to the towers and other objects near them. This is full proof of what so many people saw and described, whether they laughed at it, said it was a much smaller plane or mistook it for a chopper. The object was considerably smaller than a Police Helicopter.

Barge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

It doesn't matter what you see. A plane could not have come from the west in the final seconds. The ball did.

lol. Okay.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

lol. Okay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obt-1d9POXM

You'll get there. The ball thing was north of the south tower. That means that it moved close to T1 behind it, turned right, and then left across the rear of T2. It's shadow is seen between the towers.

"I believe that could be a police helicopter"

wb-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

wtcwestorb.jpg
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

The author of this thread insists the South Tower was struck by a giant amorphous blob of unknown composition and origin (which I have tentatively identified as the infamous and elusive Flying Spaghetti Monster) based on a single piece of evidence - the absolute lowest quality video taken from the farthest distance and the worst angle he could possibly find, while rejecting every other piece of evidence, film and video as "fake".

The quality is so good that lady liberty is made out quite nicely. Your claim of poor quality is debunked. A ball showed up in the most important footage from 911.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GFnEFBZhGM
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

The quality is so good that lady liberty is made out quite nicely. Your claim of poor quality is debunked. A ball showed up in the most important footage from 911.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GFnEFBZhGM

The plane is easy to see, easier than lady liberty's torch in that picture/video.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

I can make out the SOL and the barge perfectly. That proves without a doubt that flight 175 would be discernable had it really been there.

This comp was done a few years ago by a guy named Equinox. What he failed to point out was the barge, (left of tower 2) which is 150-200 feet long. The towers were 208 ft wide and a boeing 767-222 is around 168 ft. The plane would have to scale to around 80% of the towers. It is literally a dot compared to the towers and other objects near them. This is full proof of what so many people saw and described, whether they laughed at it, said it was a much smaller plane or mistook it for a chopper. The object was considerably smaller than a Police Helicopter.

Barge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



failure to understand distance/angles and perspective dont make up for the fact your video is not fuzzy enough
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yIdT4t1iHg

"Dude, I saw the second explosion, there was no plane that hit that second building, it exploded from the inside out."

"You said the second one was just an explosion?"

"I didn't see a plane. I was here watching it. I couldn't believe it. It exploded, it was like a flash of white light and everything just blew out."
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obt-1d9POXM

You'll get there. The ball thing was north of the south tower. That means that it moved close to T1 behind it, turned right, and then left across the rear of T2. It's shadow is seen between the towers.

"I believe that could be a police helicopter"

wb-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif

wtcwestorb.jpg

Not likely.

By the way I was just watching the CNN special on 9-11 and there was one video snippet video that very clearly showed an airplane hit the second tower. So clear as to be completely unmistakeable.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yIdT4t1iHg

"Dude, I saw the second explosion, there was no plane that hit that second building, it exploded from the inside out."

"You said the second one was just an explosion?"

"I didn't see a plane. I was here watching it. I couldn't believe it. It exploded, it was like a flash of white light and everything just blew out."

Someone not seeing something that many others saw is not really relevant to your pathetic not nearly fuzzy enough airplane video.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

Not likely.

By the way I was just watching the CNN special on 9-11 and there was one video snippet video that very clearly showed an airplane hit the second tower. So clear as to be completely unmistakeable.

Cters have this ability to ignore evidence they dont like, then take something out of context or completley irrelevant and pretend it has some great cosmic meaning, such as a fuzzy video of a plane and pretending it isnt a plane.
 
After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from NY

It doesn't matter what you see. A plane could not have come from the west in the final seconds. The ball did.

Please show evidence that "a ball" could come magically through the sky and make the destruction we saw. Give the exact dimensions, material, and weight of the ball and explain how it remained in the air that long without wings. And the speed of this ball.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

Please show evidence that "a ball" could come magically through the sky and make the destruction we saw. Give the exact dimensions, material, and weight of the ball and explain how it remained in the air that long without wings. And the speed of this ball.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He never explains that. We must assume that it was a magic ball.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

He never explains that. We must assume that it was a magic ball.

Magic 8 Ball?
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

How would you prove that a floating ball was a passenger plane?:lamo That is where you clowns would be in the real world.

My answer is simple and factual. The object filmed by chopper 4 was not flight 175 or any type of plane.

Because even in your fuzzy video it still looks like a plane.
Your answer is wrong.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

He never explains that. We must assume that it was a magic ball.

How would you prove that a floating ball was a passenger plane?:lamo That is where you clowns would be in the real world.

My answer is simple and factual. The object filmed by chopper 4 was not flight 175 or any type of plane.

Magic 8 Ball?

It wasn't a chopper either.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

Because even in your fuzzy video it still looks like a plane.
Your answer is wrong.

You have no answers and no facts. The object was not a plane. Everything can be made out except your fuzzy ball.:lamo

[/URL]
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

You have no answers and no facts. The object was not a plane. Everything can be made out except your fuzzy ball.:lamo

[/URL]

Its a plane not a ball, you need to make the video even fuzzier if you want to claim otherwise.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

My answer is simple and factual.
You defientley have the simple part covered but as to factual you are soo far off you arent even in the right solar system
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

He never explains that. We must assume that it was a magic ball.

Indeed. No attempt to explain what the ball is, what it is made of, how big it is, who threw it, how it made a 767 shaped hole in 2 WTC, how it deposited airplane parts, seats and bits of passengers and crew and their luggage from Flight 175 all over lower Manhattan, etc, etc,...

Nor is there a snowballs chance in you-know-where these questions will be answered by the OP.

Best to just move along
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

You defientley have the simple part covered but as to factual you are soo far off you arent even in the right solar system

You keep saying it, but make no attempt to prove it. How is a floating ball a plane? How would you prove it beyond saying you believe it's a plane?
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

Indeed. No attempt to explain what the ball is, what it is made of, how big it is, who threw it, how it made a 767 shaped hole in 2 WTC, how it deposited airplane parts, seats and bits of passengers and crew and their luggage from Flight 175 all over lower Manhattan, etc, etc,...

Nor is there a snowballs chance in you-know-where these questions will be answered by the OP.

Best to just move along

You make no attempt to prove a ball is a plane.:lamo Of course, because you know you would fail if you tried.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

Indeed. No attempt to explain what the ball is, what it is made of, how big it is, who threw it, how it made a 767 shaped hole in 2 WTC, how it deposited airplane parts, seats and bits of passengers and crew and their luggage from Flight 175 all over lower Manhattan, etc, etc,...

Nor is there a snowballs chance in you-know-where these questions will be answered by the OP.

Best to just move along

I swear these 9/11 Truthers always keep changing their story, which is a given, considering we're talking about a moronic conspiracy theory.

First it's a drone plane filled with explosives. Then it's a plane piloted by government operatives that has a nuclear missile strapped to it's underside. Then it's a hologram/projection. And now, it wasn't a plane at all; it was a floating ball.

Which ****ing one is it?
 
Last edited:
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

You make no attempt to prove a ball is a plane.:lamo Of course, because you know you would fail if you tried.

What? Are you still going on about this?

It's already been proven: nothing happened on 9/11 to the Twin Towers. They're still standing, they still have people working in them.

Sheesh. Some people will believe ANY conspiracy.
 
Re: After 15 years of delusional stupidity flights 11 and 175 were still absent from

What? Are you still going on about this?

It's already been proven: nothing happened on 9/11 to the Twin Towers. They're still standing, they still have people working in them.

Sheesh. Some people will believe ANY conspiracy.

I never argued any conspiracy. I posted the ball and explained in many different ways that it was a real object.
 
Back
Top Bottom