Really? Can you identify examples of NDEs that don’t involve people with brains?Yes of course it does. Take for example the NDE's , they prove that.And there is more,
Our brain is more like a reciever.
Really? Can you identify examples of NDEs that don’t involve people with brains?
There is the body-mind, which is the mind that is rooted in your neural, organic brain, in this animal body. It is the personality based ego. Then there is the spiritual consciousness. When they are together, they are virtually indistinguishable. Once the ego has resolved its personality based psychodramas, it may be able to collaborate with the spiritual consciousness, but it can never "be it" because it is transitory. The spiritual consciousness is the witness that never changes, it's always the observer. When the body dies the ego dies, and the spirit moves elsewhere.
Unsupported belief.
Mental Clarity During Near-Death Experiences Suggests Mind Exists Apart From Brain: Study
If the mind is just a function of the brain, it stands to reason that the worse the brain is injured, the worse the mind would function. While this is what much of current brain research is finding, a body of evidence exists suggesting otherwise: under extreme circumstances, such as close to death, the mind may function well—or even better than usual—when the brain is impaired.
This suggests the mind may function independently of the brain.
Mental Clarity During Near-Death Experiences Suggests Mind Exists Apart From Brain: Study
Kinda like a Boeing at the Pentagon? :lamo
Unsupported belief.
Can you elaborate?
Can you elaborate?
You are right to ask! It is supported by opinion.
When the ego dies the spirit moves elsewhere. What evidence do you have to back up that statement? There is no proof of the existence of this spirit.
What kind of evidence would you like?
What kind of evidence would you like?
The evidence kind of evidence.
You said that the belief is unsupported and that it lacks evidence. I am asking you to clarify what kind of evidence you would like?
Scientific? Philosophical? Religious? Mathematical? Spiritual?
What?
I did elaborate. Can you answer me? Opinions are not evidence.
This lunatic gibberish isn't even close to being a "conspiracy theory."