• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

There is no (macro) evolution

calamity said:
If someone does not know what evolution is or understands the mechanisms by which it works...that's their problem. It's like people who do not know how to read. Not my job to teach them.
Click to expand...

lol

well, what nonsense again

Hundreds of scientist even diagree with evolution...............and they understand evolution.
 
Pin dÁr said:
lol

well, what nonsense again

Hundreds of scientist even diagree with evolution...............and they understand evolution.
Click to expand...

What do you say about the scientists who agree with evolution? and they understand evolution.
 
mike2810 said:
What do you say about the scientists who agree with evolution? and they understand evolution.
Click to expand...

Well, if there are those who agree and those who disagree then there is something very very very amiss with evolution.

Which is with most hoaxes!

We for sure can't talk about fact anymore.


We are talking about the Emperor Clothes here.




But is a nice kind if Theater,, not taking it too seriously.
 
Pin dÁr said:
lol

well, what nonsense again

Hundreds of scientist even diagree with evolution...............and they understand evolution.
Click to expand...

No one with a brain that is firing on all cylinders disagrees with the fundamental principles of evolution. It is after all, quite evident through observation: fossil record and DNA analysis.
 
calamity said:
No one with a brain that is firing on all cylinders disagrees with the fundamental principles of evolution. It is after all, quite evident through observation: fossil record and DNA analysis.
Click to expand...

Lots of wrongs with the fossils and lots of wrong with the DNA analysis.

And as I have written hundreds and hundreds of scientists disagree with evolution.

And rightly so, it is a hoax, that is bollocks and ****e,.
 
Pin dÁr said:
Lots of wrongs with the fossils and lots of wrong with the DNA analysis.

And as I have written hundreds and hundreds of scientists disagree with evolution.

And rightly so, it is a hoax, that is bollocks and ****e,.
Click to expand...

Cartoon-global-warming-is-a-hoax.gif
 
Pin dÁr said:
same kind, mate. Hence micro evolution NOT macro evolution which is non existent.

Thanks!
Click to expand...

No such thing as microevolution either. Only evolution. Once bunches of changes occur to a single species it becomes another species. Hence why we cannot mate with a chimpanzee. Our DNA is almost identical. But enough changes have occurred over so many years that we are no longer the same species.

But guess what, other animals can cross that line and mate. How about a mule and a donkey?

This is been fun and you have proven my original point. It doesn't matter how many facts I bring to you you were going to shoot them down because they do not support your incorrect conclusion. You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts. You were trying to create your own facts.
 
blackjack50 said:
No such thing as microevolution either. Only evolution. Once bunches of changes occur to a single species it becomes another species. Hence why we cannot mate with a chimpanzee. Our DNA is almost identical. But enough changes have occurred over so many years that we are no longer the same species.

But guess what, other animals can cross that line and mate. How about a mule and a donkey?

This is been fun and you have proven my original point. It doesn't matter how many facts I bring to you you were going to shoot them down because they do not support your incorrect conclusion. You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts. You were trying to create your own facts.
Click to expand...
Donkey's yes, I think all Mule's are sterile.
 
pin dár said:
and how the hell can people call 'evolution' a fact, while hundreds and hundreds of scientists disagree?
Click to expand...

Yet another PRATTT.
 
Last edited:
Pin dÁr said:
Well, it really looks like evolution is obsolete, ah well, hoaxes don't live that long. lol
Click to expand...
Yup, Abiogenesis is not Evolution. PRATT. The scientist quoted is right, Abiogenesis is pretty much hypothesis, at the moment.
 
blackjack50 said:
No such thing as microevolution either. Only evolution. Once bunches of changes occur to a single species it becomes another species. .
Click to expand...


That has to been proven. So far it hasn't. in fact people count on it not happening!
 
William Rea said:
Yup, Abiogenesis is not Evolution. PRATT. The scientist quoted is right, Abiogenesis is pretty much hypothesis, at the moment.
Click to expand...

That just shows that he has no idea what he's talking about, since he's confusing Abiogenesis with Evolution.
 
William Rea said:
Yup, Abiogenesis is not Evolution. PRATT. The scientist quoted is right, Abiogenesis is pretty much hypothesis, at the moment.
Click to expand...

yes I know AND it is a funny thing.

I tell you why:


It used to be in the textbook, the origins of life, the soup etc.all wrong of course.

So, 'they' couldn't longer hold to that non-sense, so they now have eliminated that non-sense
from the textbooks. Now saying it is no longer a part of evolution. How convenient.

They had too.

And now they have to eliminate more and more, with as apotheosis

,telling us that evolution is no evolution.





Oh man, the whole hoax is sooo funny to watch and people defending this crap, it is unbelievable.
 
Pin dÁr said:
And there is soo much more
Click to expand...
A professor in Mathematics would not be my first choice source of authority on Evolutionary Biology but, he has a point. We know far more now than Darwin did but even so, Darwin was right about the essentials. PRATT. Your Gish Gallop into creotardland is proving pretty easy to pick apart. How are you getting on with your alternative explanation for ERVs?
 
Pin dÁr said:
yes I know AND it is a funny thing.

I tell you why:


It used to be in the textbook, the origins of life, the soup etc.all wrong of course.

So, 'they' couldn't longer hold to that non-sense, so they now have eliminated that non-sense
from the textbooks. Now saying it is no longer a part of evolution. How convenient.

They had too.

And now they have to eliminate more and more, with as apotheosis

,telling us that evolution is no evolution.





Oh man, the whole hoax is sooo funny to watch and people defending this crap, it is unbelievable.
Click to expand...
PRATT. ToE has never claimed to be anything other than an explanation for the diversity of species observed as a fact, the big clue is the, 'Origin of Species' title. Are you going to claim that it was a plot to c!every disguise that in the ****ing title of the book?
 
William Rea said:
A professor in Mathematics would not be my first choice source of authority on Evolutionary Biology but, he has a point. We know far more now than Darwin did but even so, Darwin was right about the essentials. PRATT. Your Gish Gallop into creotardland is proving pretty easy to pick apart. How are you getting on with your alternative explanation for ERVs?
Click to expand...

You still don't get it that I don't have to give alternative explanantions.
and why the Ad Hominem? Something I wrote? lol



But tell me this, why do you still believe in the lies of (macro) evolution?
 
William Rea said:
PRATT. ToE has never claimed to be anything other than an explanation for the diversity of species observed as a fact, the big clue is the, 'Origin of Species' title. Are you going to claim that it was a plot to c!every disguise that in the ****ing title of the book?
Click to expand...

bit vague eh?
 
Pin dÁr said:
yes I know AND it is a funny thing.

I tell you why:


It used to be in the textbook, the origins of life, the soup etc.all wrong of course.

So, 'they' couldn't longer hold to that non-sense, so they now have eliminated that non-sense
from the textbooks. Now saying it is no longer a part of evolution. How convenient.

They had too.

And now they have to eliminate more and more, with as apotheosis

,telling us that evolution is no evolution.





Oh man, the whole hoax is sooo funny to watch and people defending this crap, it is unbelievable.
Click to expand...

nonsense---one word.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom