• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Vaccines are dangerous

You live on that "River Denial". The one who is intellectually lazy is you. Conspiracy theorists, of which you are one, ONLY consider information that support their theory, discounting anything that does not. They LIVE in the logical fallacy of conformation bias. It's what makes them extremely intellectually lazy. That seems to be a great description of what you do.

I really can't take you very seriously. You have not even a clue about what I am talking about,

I you want to remain ignorant, your choice and ok with me.

I will stop responding to you now. You just can't handle somethings.


Bye.
 
I really can't take you very seriously. You have not even a clue about what I am talking about,

I you want to remain ignorant, your choice and ok with me.

I will stop responding to you now. You just can't handle somethings.


Bye.

This is an excellent example of what conspiracy theorists do. When confronted with the ignorance and confirmation bias of their positions, they turn tail and run away. Your positions are completely ignorant, have no basis in reality, and rely on the logical fallacy of confirmation bias as support... which is no support at all. If you don't like this being pointed out, don't post in an ignorant, illogical way.
 
I really can't take you very seriously. You have not even a clue about what I am talking about,

I you want to remain ignorant, your choice and ok with me.

I will stop responding to you now. You just can't handle somethings.


Bye.

How can anyone take you seriously when you cannot provide any actual evidence to back up your long debunked claims?
 
Disease is more dangerous.

/thread
 
I agree very much with your second sentence here, but it's long been known that each and every individual reacts differently to any given stimulus, especially drugs.

That is, those critical or suspicious of vaccines may very well be right.

This is truly a conundrum. My children were both vaccinated, and I would do it again. Still, they may very well have a point.

I'm more than willing to risk a few autistic children to save an entire generation from smallpox or meningitis.
 
I'm more than willing to risk a few autistic children to save an entire generation from smallpox or meningitis.

of which vaccines have nothing to do with!

wow! This programmed belief runs deep at people.
 
I'm more than willing to risk a few autistic children to save an entire generation from smallpox or meningitis.

That is the crux of the matter, for sure.

There is no question that the human species would not be as successful as it is in populating the earth without vaccines.
 
That is the crux of the matter, for sure.

There is no question that the human species would not be as successful as it is in populating the earth without vaccines.

lol

i m b e l i e v a b l e!


what crap!!
 
Fig1_measles.gif
 
well, one day people have to wake up to this.

[United States and England]
According to VACCINES Are They Really Safe & Effective? by Neil Z. Miller,
"From 1923 to 1953,before the Salk killed-virus vaccine was introduced, the polio death rate in the United States and England had already declined on its own by 47 percent and 55 percent, respectively. Source International Mortality Statistics (1981) by Michael Alderson."
See page 16.
 
lol

i m b e l i e v a b l e!


what crap!!

Do you mean to say that if vaccines had not arrived on the scene there would be as many humans as there are now?

Of course we can only speculate, but Jared Diamond's book "Guns, Germs and Steel" suggests that the germs have thinned out the population quite well over the centuries prior to vaccine arrival.
 
well, one day people have to wake up to this.

Preach it brother.

If vaccines don't curb infectious diseases, why do you think they're administered? You can't just tell us have the truth.
 
Do you mean to say that if vaccines had not arrived on the scene there would be as many humans as there are now?

Of course we can only speculate, but Jared Diamond's book "Guns, Germs and Steel" suggests that the germs have thinned out the population quite well over the centuries prior to vaccine arrival.

Well, I have to read the book first I admit, but as fas as I know now, vaccines had really nothing to with that,
 
Preach it brother.

If vaccines don't curb infectious diseases, why do you think they're administered? You can't just tell us have the truth.

why they are adminsisterd? to change dna and cul the population.
and of course weaken the immune system.

The blind spot for a lot of people is that the people behing d this all are psychopaths.That means they have no empathy.
So they have no problem amking children sick or die.
 
Even the nurses are waking up ti the vaccine hoas!

Hoerey!
 
why they are adminsisterd? to change dna and cul the population.
and of course weaken the immune system.

The blind spot for a lot of people is that the people behing d this all are psychopaths.That means they have no empathy.
So they have no problem amking children sick or die.

But you see, the world has never experienced such population explosion. They must be doing a horrible job if that's what they're after. Also, to change DNA? how do you change DNA?
 
Now recently, two movies were removed from film-festivals:

Vaxxed & Man Made Epidemic.


View attachment 67202477

Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe (2016) - IMDb

View attachment 67202478

Man Made Epidemic (2016) - IMDb


Of course these films were removed by Bigguie Pharma, who will loose a lots of money if people find out about the

vaccine scam!


And ah well, it seems there is no free speech anymore!



Anyway, if parents want to poison their children with vaccines........



btw the sickness and illnes in the past weren't removed by vaccines at all! sheer propaganda!

The only thing dangerous about vaccines is not getting vaccinated.

I guess, in your mind, giving your dog a rabies shot is just a scam by biggie vet. :roll:
 
wekk, well, well

"The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition."
Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis (Bantam Books, 1977)
 
well, well, well

"Finally, although the overall incidence of typical acute measles in the U.S. has dropped sharply from about 400,000 cases annually in the early 1960s to about 30,000 cases by 1974-76, the death rate remained exactly the same; and, with the peak incidence now occurring in adolescents and young adults, the risk of pneumonia and demonstrable liver abnormalities has actually increased substantially, according to one recent study, to well over 3% and 2%, respectively."
Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983, American Institute of Homeopathy.
 
well, well, well

"While 70-80% of British children were immunized against pertussis in 1970-71, the rate is now 39%. The committee predicts that the next pertussis epidemic will probably turn out to be more severe than the one in 1974/75. However, they do not explain why, in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities."
Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370.
 
wel, well well

"... Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored."
Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217
 
well, well, well

"Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children."
Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58. "Pertussis (whooping cough) immunization is controversial, as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity. The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects... annual deaths, per million children, from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies, shows that from a high point of just under 900 deaths per million children (under age 15) in 1905, the decline has been consistent and dramatic. There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80% by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale, in the mid-nineteen fifties. The decline has continued, albeit at a slower rate, ever since. No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use."
Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 63.
 
Back
Top Bottom