• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What really happened to Scalia?

Fledermaus said:
YOU SAID "So far, EVIDENCE of foul play is whatever Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone."

Now it does not matter what Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone?

Does that make sense to you?
Click to expand...

Does that make sense to me? That's not the question you're entitled to ask.
 
dolphinocean said:
He was 79, still mentally active beyond his age as a SC judge & physically fit & active up to the very night he went to bed. The left think that if there is no hard medical proof from them that he died of natural causes then we must prove otherwise in order to doubt their half-ass finding.
Click to expand...

Those on the Left do think you need to prove otherwise, you're right. So do other sensible people.
 
dolphinocean said:
Does that make sense to me? That's not the question you're entitled to ask.
Click to expand...

Dodging....

YOU CLAIMED "So far, EVIDENCE of foul play is whatever Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone."

Now it does not matter what Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone?
 
dolphinocean said:
So far, EVIDENCE of foul play is whatever Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone.
Click to expand...

Since YOU do not KNOW what Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone you are arguing from ignorance.

What do you imagine Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone that you construe as EVIDENCE of foul play?
 
Fledermaus said:
Dodging....

YOU CLAIMED "So far, EVIDENCE of foul play is whatever Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone."

Now it does not matter what Dominguez told Judge Guevara over the phone?
Click to expand...
Do you know what Dominguez told Judge Guevara? No. So, it doesn't matter to you, why should it matter to me when I don't even take her word for it without forensic evidence in the first place. But it doesn't stop you swallowing hook, line & sinker from her, do you? See, how you're so illogical here?
 
dolphinocean said:
Do you know what Dominguez told Judge Guevara? No. So, it doesn't matter to you, why should it matter to me when I don't even take her word for it without forensic evidence in the first place. But it doesn't stop you swallowing hook, line & sinker from her, do you? See, how you're so illogical here?
Click to expand...

You CLAIM the EVIDENCE for foul play is the content of a phone call that YOU do not know the content of.

An excellent example of Argument from Ignorance.

Your EVIDENCE of foul play is _______________ ?

CLUE: IT AIN'T THE PHONE CALL.
 
Fledermaus said:
You CLAIM the EVIDENCE for foul play is the content of a phone call that YOU do not know the content of.

An excellent example of Argument from Ignorance.

Your EVIDENCE of foul play is _______________ ?

CLUE: IT AIN'T THE PHONE CALL.
Click to expand...

Who cares? Weren't you the one who swallows the hook, line & sinker in one gulp and then tap dance around illogically? I guess we're done with our discussion session. Move along. Nothing new here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom