• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How the DEA invented "narco-terrorism"

T

TheDemSocialist

Gradualist
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
34,951
Reaction score
16,311
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
These undercover videos supposedly showed Al-Qaeda in the drug trade. What they actually showed was more shocking. Produced in collaboration with ProPublica.
Click to expand...




[h=1]The Narco-terror Trap[/h][h=2]The DEA warns that drugs are funding terror. An examination of cases raises questions about whether the agency is stopping threats or staging them.[/h]
by Ginger Thompson, ProPublica​
December 7, 2015
Click to expand...

This is not justice. Essentially this is chasing imaginary boogymen and calling it "narco-terrorism".
 
cpwill said:
:doh


We have a CT forum, TDS. Conspiracy Theories go there.
Click to expand...

Nothing in the video presented or the article is a conspiracy theory. Its simply presenting the history....
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Nothing in the video presented or the article is a conspiracy theory. Its simply presenting the history....
Click to expand...

That's what all conspiracy theories state. The DEA did not invent the concept of VEO's using the drug trade to self-finance, or of narco organizations using terror as a political tool.

The Masons did, after co-founding al-Qa'ida with the secret Illuminati cells inside the CIA. Everyone knows this.
 
Beaudreaux said:
CT should be posted in the CT forum - just sayin'...
Click to expand...

What the hell in the links is a theory? Its literally looking at cases. 300 and some of them and analyzing if the link between terrorism and drug trade was a DEA informant... And in those cases only 3 were found to have some sort of diret connection to funding terrorists, the rest were found to have not to be members of terrorist organizations. In all but three cases the only connection between drugs and terror is the one established by the DEA's conspiracy (AKA the informant). This is literally based off the DEA's own report...
 
cpwill said:
That's what all conspiracy theories state. The DEA did not invent the concept of VEO's using the drug trade to self-finance, or of narco organizations using terror as a political tool.

The Masons did, after co-founding al-Qa'ida with the secret Illuminati cells inside the CIA. Everyone knows this.
Click to expand...

You forgot about their blood oath with the lizard people
 
Crovax said:
You forgot about their blood oath with the lizard people
Click to expand...

:doh

YOU AREN'T SUPPOSED TO TALK ABOUT THAT IN PUBLIC, CROVAX!!!!



I mean, really. We're trying to secretly create global threat networks here out of phantasms, and you are going to go around blabbing the one part that wasn't supposed to be secretly discoverable by people operating in their parents' basement!?!?!

It beggars belief. I swear. You cannot get good help these days.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
What the hell in the links is a theory? Its literally looking at cases. 300 and some of them and analyzing if the link between terrorism and drug trade was a DEA informant... And in those cases only 3 were found to have some sort of diret connection to funding terrorists, the rest were found to have not to be members of terrorist organizations. In all but three cases the only connection between drugs and terror is the one established by the DEA's conspiracy (AKA the informant). This is literally based off the DEA's own report...
Click to expand...

I know.
 
Re: How the DEA invented "narco-terrorism"

Beaudreaux said:
I know.
Click to expand...
....it's almost like NIPF requirements to do with drugs were laid against the DEA......


Next up: almost all of our HUMINT from Russia seems to come from the CIA. Do the Russian people really exist, or are they a CIA plot?
 
Last edited:
Re: How the DEA invented "narco-terrorism"

cpwill said:
....it's almost like NIPF requirements to do with drugs were laid against the DEA......


Next up: almost all of our HUMINT from Russia comes from the CIA. Do the Russian people really exist, or are they a CIA plot?
Click to expand...

They're definitely a CIA plot, paid for by the CIA senior agent in the State Department, Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland. We have pictures of her passing out US cash and Hershey chocolate bars in the streets of Kiev during the Nazi riots as ordered by the Oligarchs and the MIC to give the impression that this so called Russia was attacking, when the whole time it was just another way to ... well, I've said too much already - I hope I haven't come up on their radar yet.
 
Re: How the DEA invented "narco-terrorism"

Beaudreaux said:
They're definitely a CIA plot, paid for by the CIA senior agent in the State Department, Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland. We have pictures of her passing out US cash and Hershey chocolate bars in the streets of Kiev during the Nazi riots as ordered by the Oligarchs and the MIC to give the impression that this so called Russia was attacking, when the whole time it was just another way to ... well, I've said too much already - I hope I haven't come up on their radar yet.
Click to expand...
Nuland again. I swear, ever since she organized the fake hit on the Benghazi consulate to help us support standing up ISIL, that woman has thought she could just get away with whatever she wanted.

But yes, you are probably right. Better to be cautious. If you suddenly stop posting, or keep posting, but in a different tone and swearing that you were kidding and the Russian people do exist, we will know what has happened, and remember you, brave information warrior. Remember to keep fighting while wearing the mask of an authoritarian Catholic extremist who wanted to restore a papalist monarchy and which is made by slave labor in southeast Asia as a symbol of your dedication to anarchy, and freedom, and how, like, your stupid parents TOTALLY don't get you, and stuff.
 
Last edited:
Re: How the DEA invented "narco-terrorism"

Moderator's Warning:
YouTube video + Blog + no provable facts but a lot of conjecture = Conspiracy Theory. Moved to appropriate location.
 
cpwill said:
That's what all conspiracy theories state. The DEA did not invent the concept of VEO's using the drug trade to self-finance, or of narco organizations using terror as a political tool.

The Masons did, after co-founding al-Qa'ida with the secret Illuminati cells inside the CIA. Everyone knows this.
Click to expand...

The CIA has been in the drug business since the 60s at least. They were in it in Southeast Asia when I was there in 1970.

What's the difference?
 
Thoreau72 said:
The CIA has been in the drug business since the 60s at least. They were in it in Southeast Asia when I was there in 1970.

What's the difference?
Click to expand...

Is there any CT that you don't believe in HD.
 
braindrain said:
Is there any CT that you don't believe in HD.
Click to expand...

That's not a conspiracy theory BD. I was there. I saw it happen. Had a good friend flying for them. It's a fact, and many books have been written about it.

You're probably not interested in ruining your faith and beliefs, but google Nugan-Hand Bank. Read about it, if you dare.
 
Thoreau72 said:
That's not a conspiracy theory BD. I was there. I saw it happen. Had a good friend flying for them. It's a fact, and many books have been written about it.

You're probably not interested in ruining your faith and beliefs, but google Nugan-Hand Bank. Read about it, if you dare.
Click to expand...

Sure you did HD. Sorry but with your history of story telling as well as struggling with telling the difference between fantasy and reality I and I doubt to many folks outside of the CT fantasy land crowd believe much of what you say. And CT loons writing books is not proof of anything except that they are wackjobs making money of off other wackjobs.

And Nugan hand bank being involved in smuggling drugs for the CIA is nothing more than more of your CT fairytale unsupported by any facts. That's the reason the royal commission that investigated found nothing to support your claims.

So I guess it is true then that you do fall for oops I mean believe in virtually every CT.
 
Negatori, I pick and choose the ones that make sense. :mrgreen:

And I learned a long time ago that deception is normal behavior for too many government types--it's sad. I have friends who have worked in government, and they are good people with good intentions.

But there are some within covert parts of the government whose intentions are not quite so beneficent, they are more selfish, and they got the power, as the song says. ;)
 
Thoreau72 said:
Negatori, I pick and choose the ones that make sense. :mrgreen:

And I learned a long time ago that deception is normal behavior for too many government types--it's sad. I have friends who have worked in government, and they are good people with good intentions.

But there are some within covert parts of the government whose intentions are not quite so beneficent, they are more selfish, and they got the power, as the song says. ;)
Click to expand...
Ignoring your usually silliness care to explain how you think the hand bank is proof of your claims as there has been zero evidence that they were involved in any drug running for the CIA as evidence by the royal commission that investigated them.
 
braindrain said:
Ignoring your usually silliness care to explain how you think the hand bank is proof of your claims as there has been zero evidence that they were involved in any drug running for the CIA as evidence by the royal commission that investigated them.
Click to expand...

I don't have the book anymore, and I read it back in about 1990, so I'm going from memory.

Basically the book described various "mysterious" murders and coverups Down Under and elsewhere related to the operations at the Bank.

And to keep things in perspective, it was in 1970 that I became aware of Air America hauling dope in their helicopters and airplanes, first hand from a friend who was newly hired by the company. It really happened, and NH Bank facilitated the money collecting and moving duties associated with the dope business.

Alfred McCoy wrote several books about it.

That you are ignorant of all that, willfully or otherwise, is consistent with your worldview as expressed here at DP

:peace
 
Thoreau72 said:
I don't have the book anymore, and I read it back in about 1990, so I'm going from memory.

Basically the book described various "mysterious" murders and coverups Down Under and elsewhere related to the operations at the Bank.

And to keep things in perspective, it was in 1970 that I became aware of Air America hauling dope in their helicopters and airplanes, first hand from a friend who was newly hired by the company. It really happened, and NH Bank facilitated the money collecting and moving duties associated with the dope business.

Alfred McCoy wrote several books about it.

That you are ignorant of all that, willfully or otherwise, is consistent with your worldview as expressed here at DP

:peace
Click to expand...

So first let's just pretend that this book you "read" uncovered what three seperate investigations failed to uncover and there were murders and cover ups. You don't think that the more likely reason for those acts was to try and hide the millions of dollars the bank was stealing from investors.

Sorry I am not going to read a couple of books simply to disprove your claims. You made the claim how about you back it up for once.

Sorry I am not going to take the word of a CTer who had a long history of let's call it misinterpreting facts as well as separating reality from fiction enough to think a nuclear explosion could happen in NYC and the rest of the world wouldn't notice. Let's just say I have my doubts the CIA would be so sloppy with OPSEC that some nobody knows about as it's going down but somehow it still has remained under wraps for coming up on half a century now.

So getting back to your claim do you intend to provide any more proof other then a book you read a long time ago or a friend you talked to.
 
braindrain said:
So first let's just pretend that this book you "read" uncovered what three seperate investigations failed to uncover and there were murders and cover ups. You don't think that the more likely reason for those acts was to try and hide the millions of dollars the bank was stealing from investors.

Sorry I am not going to read a couple of books simply to disprove your claims. You made the claim how about you back it up for once.

Sorry I am not going to take the word of a CTer who had a long history of let's call it misinterpreting facts as well as separating reality from fiction enough to think a nuclear explosion could happen in NYC and the rest of the world wouldn't notice. Let's just say I have my doubts the CIA would be so sloppy with OPSEC that some nobody knows about as it's going down but somehow it still has remained under wraps for coming up on half a century now.

So getting back to your claim do you intend to provide any more proof other then a book you read a long time ago or a friend you talked to.
Click to expand...

I hope you know by now BD, that we have a mutual type relationship here. You don't consider me credible, and I don't consider you credible. Not to ignore status, but certainly not credible. :mrgreen:
 
Thoreau72 said:
I hope you know by now BD, that we have a mutual type relationship here. You don't consider me credible, and I don't consider you credible. Not to ignore status, but certainly not credible. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...
The difference is I am not the one making up a bunch of claims and then refusing to provide any evidence of those claims. So proof got any.
 
braindrain said:
The difference is I am not the one making up a bunch of claims and then refusing to provide any evidence of those claims. So proof got any.
Click to expand...

Oh, but you are making untrue claims, nearly every time you support some government manufactured Fairy Tale, whether it be 911 or Abbottabad. You is a gubmint man, all the way, and gubmint stories are mostly, not always, false.

From southeast asia to central America and the Contras, the CIA has been in the dope business. The DEA is also caught up in false tales--those guys have a bureaucracy to protect, jobs to protect.
 
Thoreau72 said:
Oh, but you are making untrue claims, nearly every time you support some government manufactured Fairy Tale, whether it be 911 or Abbottabad. You is a gubmint man, all the way, and gubmint stories are mostly, not always, false.

From southeast asia to central America and the Contras, the CIA has been in the dope business. The DEA is also caught up in false tales--those guys have a bureaucracy to protect, jobs to protect.
Click to expand...

Sorry asking you to back up your claims and calling you on it you when you can't is not making a claim. It's funny, you just know all these incidents are false but can't prove anything.

So once again got any proof.

To be honest I don't know why any one bothers as we all know you don't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom