• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft[W:47]

S

shanners

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
405
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o551CQFAMKI

Note the connection to the rabid Jewish Zionist Dov Zakheim, whose Wikipedia page states:

"From 1987–2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, a high-technology analytical firm ... He was then appointed as Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) from 2001 in George W. Bush administration, and served in this capacity until April 2004. During his term as Comptroller, he was tasked to help track down the Pentagon's 2.3 trillion dollars' worth of unaccounted transactions. He was unable to find 2.3 trillion dollars."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_S._Zakheim
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

shanners said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o551CQFAMKI

Note the connection to the rabid Jewish Zionist Dov Zakheim, whose Wikipedia page states:

"From 1987–2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, a high-technology analytical firm ... He was then appointed as Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) from 2001 in George W. Bush administration, and served in this capacity until April 2004. During his term as Comptroller, he was tasked to help track down the Pentagon's 2.3 trillion dollars' worth of unaccounted transactions. He was unable to find 2.3 trillion dollars."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_S._Zakheim
Click to expand...

I hope you are not expecting a intelligent discussion. That vid tells it like it is they will ether ignore this post or just give a lot of stupid replies.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

ranfunck said:
I hope you are not expecting a intelligent discussion. That vid tells it like it is they will ether ignore this post or just give a lot of stupid replies.
Click to expand...

Maybe someone can tell my why they think they were looking for roughly half of over 200 years of accumulated debt?


defense department figures are spoken of in Billions,NOT Trillions
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

ranfunck said:
I hope you are not expecting a intelligent discussion. That vid tells it like it is they will ether ignore this post or just give a lot of stupid replies.
Click to expand...

Certainly not with an OP as wrong as this one.

But let us look at the claim.

It appears the claimant believes the FAA, the ATCs, the aircraft owners/airlines, the airlines insurance agency, the airport personal and so many others are all either "in on it" of completely clueless when they allowed passengers to board a non-Commercial aircraft.

Does this really make sense to you?
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

shanners said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o551CQFAMKI

Note the connection to the rabid Jewish Zionist Dov Zakheim, whose Wikipedia page states:

"From 1987–2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, a high-technology analytical firm ... He was then appointed as Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) from 2001 in George W. Bush administration, and served in this capacity until April 2004. During his term as Comptroller, he was tasked to help track down the Pentagon's 2.3 trillion dollars' worth of unaccounted transactions. He was unable to find 2.3 trillion dollars."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dov_S._Zakheim
Click to expand...

Not a good start if you cant even get the bolded correct.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

wl45hd said:
Maybe someone can tell my why they think they were looking for roughly half of over 200 years of accumulated debt?

defense department figures are spoken of in Billions,NOT Trillions
Click to expand...

The $2.3 Trillion meme has been done to death. There were $2.3 Trillion that the Pentagon could not account for. This was known LONG before 9/11 and the auditing went on LONG after 9/11 in which much of the so-called "missing" money was found/accounted for.

Truthers are not known for their accuracy or honesty.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Oh look, it was the Jews.

What a shock.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Fledermaus said:
The $2.3 Trillion meme has been done to death. There were $2.3 Trillion that the Pentagon could not account for. This was known LONG before 9/11 and the auditing went on LONG after 9/11 in which much of the so-called "missing" money was found/accounted for.

Truthers are not known for their accuracy or honesty.
Click to expand...

Correction, pal. THIS troofer has pointed out many times that the $2.3 trillion was known to be missing long before Bush took office. 9/10/01 Congress subcommittee was conducting hearings on the missing funds. It takes congress many long months, perhaps years to react to things such as that.

Pretty sweet though, that most of the casualties at the Pentagon were amongst those congressional auditors. Ol' Hani really knew what he was doing, eh? A Perfect Strike. ;)
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Henry David said:
Correction, pal. THIS troofer has pointed out many times that the $2.3 trillion was known to be missing long before Bush took office. 9/10/01 Congress subcommittee was conducting hearings on the missing funds. It takes congress many long months, perhaps years to react to things such as that.

Pretty sweet though, that most of the casualties at the Pentagon were amongst those congressional auditors. Ol' Hani really knew what he was doing, eh? A Perfect Strike. ;)
Click to expand...
They were NOT 'most of the casualties',and what makes you think the audit would take place at ONE location?

And how were they looking for an amount that represented half of the debt incured by the country since it began?
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Mark F said:
Oh look, it was the Jews.

What a shock.
Click to expand...

Scratch a conspiracy theorist, find an anti-semite underneath.

Happens every time...
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

beefheart said:
Scratch a conspiracy theorist, find an anti-semite underneath.

Happens every time...
Click to expand...


I don't believe it happens every time, but in Mark's and Fledermaus's cases, you are most likely correct.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Fledermaus said:
Not every time... Just most of the time.

The rest blame the Lizard People.
Click to expand...

Shape shifting lizard people!!!
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Fledermaus said:
I stand corrected.
Click to expand...

Hmm, you purpousely didn't put in shape shifting....that means, you are part of the conspiracy!!!!
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Fledermaus said:
Certainly not with an OP as wrong as this one.

But let us look at the claim.

It appears the claimant believes the FAA, the ATCs, the aircraft owners/airlines, the airlines insurance agency, the airport personal and so many others are all either "in on it" of completely clueless when they allowed passengers to board a non-Commercial aircraft.

Does this really make sense to you?
Click to expand...

One question for you please don't give me any of your bs replies. Do you see some thing attached to the underside of the plane in the vid yes or no.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

ranfunck said:
One question for you please don't give me any of your bs replies. Do you see some thing attached to the underside of the plane in the vid yes or no.
Click to expand...

Yes... In the extremely poor grade video I can make out the landing gear bulge.

What do YOU think it was?

Since this was a commercial airliner.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Fledermaus said:
So, what is YOUR theory ranfunck?
Click to expand...

Don't have one but any theory out there is more plausible then the governments fairy tale.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

ranfunck said:
Don't have one but any theory out there is more plausible then the governments fairy tale.
Click to expand...

Ridiculous...

Space beams? That is one theory. Nukes. Another theory.

Are those more plausible then the governments narrative that practically all the evidence supports?.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Fledermaus said:
Ridiculous...

Space beams? That is one theory. Nukes. Another theory.

Are those more plausible then the governments narrative that practically all the evidence supports?.
Click to expand...

Wasn't aware of any real evidence to support the governments fairy tale.
Yes space beams, nukes is more plausible then the governments story that is how bad there story is like it or not there story is total bs.
 
Re: Flight 175 Was Not A Commercial Aircraft

Fledermaus said:
Well, it is Shanners. And Dov is a JOOOOO.

And since Dov did nothing wrong it only fits that Shanners implies evil in his case.
Click to expand...

Remember, Shanners isn't an anti-Semite, even though he blames Jews for everything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom