So where are the conspiracy theorists now on ISIS attack on Paris [W:71]

braindrain said:

You are absolutely right that some people are easily fooled. You are the perfect example of that. It appears that you fall for every ct fairytale out there.

Click to expand...

What you don't know, and don't care about, is that I bought into the same Fairy Tale that you still hold to. It took me 4 years to figure out I was fooled, but you still haven't figured it out 14 years later. :lamo

Henry David said:

What you don't know, and don't care about, is that I bought into the same Fairy Tale that you still hold to. It took me 4 years to figure out I was fooled, but you still haven't figured it out 14 years later. :lamo

Click to expand...

And I believe you about that as much as I believed you when you said the Russian airline was shot down

braindrain said:

And I believe you about that as much as I believed you when you said the Russian airline was shot down

Click to expand...

And you think I care whether you believe me? :doh

Henry David said:

So true! Some folks are easily fooled. The old saying is that it is easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him that he has been fooled. Humans are easily deceived, especially with the advent of television and internet.

Click to expand...

So where is your evidence it was staged.?

American said:

Where the **** are you people now, with your "inside job" theories? Don't have Bush to blame or what? Can't figure out how Bush paid the French President to let this happen? ISIS works for the CIA right? Come on, the silence is deafening.

Click to expand...

It's Bush's fault. You still hear it at least once a day if you turn on the daily dribble on the TV. We have just gotten so used to hearing it that we auto tune it out.

Saucey said:

It's Bush's fault. You still hear it at least once a day if you turn on the daily dribble on the TV. We have just gotten so used to hearing it that we auto tune it out.

Click to expand...

So many times the truth is very painful for individuals. We all have a self-defense mechanism built in to our psyche that tries to minimize such pain, and that is caricaturized often as 3 monkeys with ears covered, eyes covered and lips sealed--see no evil, hear no evil and don't speak, in an effort to avoid the discomfort.

Some are afflicted more than others by the inability to confront an inconvenient truth.

Henry David said:

So many times the truth is very painful for individuals. We all have a self-defense mechanism built in to our psyche that tries to minimize such pain, and that is caricaturized often as 3 monkeys with ears covered, eyes covered and lips sealed--see no evil, hear no evil and don't speak, in an effort to avoid the discomfort.

Some are afflicted more than others by the inability to confront an inconvenient truth.

Click to expand...

Yes, I agree.

Like when you kept harping on about the Porta Potties and Check-in sign at Sandy Hook until I pointed out the facts of those two alleged anomalies. You were of course, flat wrong about both. True to form rather than acknowledging that you ran away and hid for a few weeks before sneaking your original falsified claims back into the discussion the other day - as if the correct information had never been presented. So naturally I reminded you - and in typical fashion you pretended to ignore, rather than acknowledge and amend your original position. And before you start your duck-and-dodge routine,...

Here is you babbling on about claims you have not even bothered to do the slightest amount of fact-checking on regarding a Check-in sign and Porta Potties at Sandy Hook.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...n-boming-w-27-79-221-a-45.html#post1065135876
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...n-boming-w-27-79-221-a-45.html#post1065140095
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...n-boming-w-27-79-221-a-45.html#post1065135748
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...n-boming-w-27-79-221-a-46.html#post1065141095

Here is me setting the story straight about your two anomalies that were supposed to prove the inside job at Sandy Hook. You never posted in that thread after this.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...n-boming-w-27-79-221-a-46.html#post1065141955

Here is you sneaking in the "Sandy Hook photo's" again in a different post on 11/25
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...is-attack-paris-w-71-a-10.html#post1065287949

And me reminding you that your original claim was bunk. I couldn't help but notice you didn't reply to this either.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...is-attack-paris-w-71-a-10.html#post1065287986

The above is just a single example of a process you have repeated many times. My suggestion would be to practice what you preach and stop closing yourself off to inconvenient truths, pretending they were never presented so you can go on making the same false claims.