| Conspiracy Theories Surveillance without warrant and August plot; 544. Step by step, dogs take over the power (3/14/08)
I went back to the freedominion.com site ... |
05-16-08, 08:15 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 544. Step by step, dogs take over the power (3/14/08)
I went back to the freedominion.com site and found its window background went back to the usual format. The missing two years postings came back too like nothing had happened. Only the message I posted on March 1st 08 is missing which reminds me it was not a dream. The surveillance server did supply me the old format on 3/1 then pulled it back later. That action carried away the message I posted on that day. I tried the url I loaded on that day. It leads to another thread of two years ago which I have never attended. It may prove Feds did give me the old thread which was intercepted two years ago. So when they withdrew it(url) from the list they had to replace it by a nearby thread that ends at same time - April 2006.
This is a typical way how Feds manipulate this country. They control media and internet. They intercept and censor your post if they don't like it while you misunderstand your post could be read by other people. Election is similar. Feds control the election office. People who vote thought their ballot would be counted. As a matter of fact, the officer who control voting box decide everything. If the result meets their will, they let it go. Otherwise they censor it and give out a fake one. Nobody can verify it. What they need to do is to let out some reason in media to justify the result.
Three days ago, news reported: "SPITZER/ Federal wiretap caught plans to meet prostitute". "January FBI stakeout of Spitzer reported". From the topic I got three points. 1. Demo is the target. (Spitzer is an elite of Democrats) 2. FBI openly show off in stage. 3. Wiretap emphasized. It is an extortion from DOJ obviously. What relates to these three points recently? Warrantless wiretap!
Here is a brief news today:
"House closes doors to debate wiretapping
The House held a closed session Thursday for the first time in 25 years to discuss a hotly contested surveillance bill.
Republicans requested privacy for what they termed "an honest debate" on the new Democratic eavesdropping measure that is opposed by the White House and most Republicans in Congress.
Lawmakers were forbidden to disclose what was said during the hourlong session. The extent to which minds were changed, if at all, should be more clear today, when the House was expected to openly debate and then vote on the bill."
(Mercury News 3/14/08)
Human raise dogs to protect their homes. Dogs were chained because otherwise they might kill with the power they were given. But with so much power dogs want to be master to govern the human. So they had a false flag attack on 9/11 2001. Now it's another extortion to increase dogs' power - to attack on their own will. (Dogs used to be told they could only attack with the permission of human - a court warrant) Under the extortion of the dogs, will human give them another blank check?
545. Warrantless wiretapping law and my case (3/19/08)
At least two provision in Patriot Act are designed particularly for my case. One is the Library surveillance and the other is the moveable phone-line surveillance (on any phone suspect used not particular on one fixed phone line.) Because I found that my article in internet could only be readable on computer connected to my phone line but couldn't be found on computer which connected to my tenant's phone line, although we lived in same house. Later I tried to verify this censorship in computer of public library. So I knew the provision is targeting on my case when they changed the Act.
But even under Patriot Act, Feds need warrant to legally put me under surveillance. I am neither a terrorist nor a drug dealer, how could they get warrant from the judge? At first they cheated the judge, then Feds just abandoned that effort. They simply authorized themselves to monitor without warrant - by warrantless surveillance. This is, anyhow, a big violence to the civil rights the Constitution promises to the citizens. The principle of Check and Balance collapsed before it.
So the Warrantless wiretap law was only a temporary one. It was designed to be terminated in the end of January 2008. I observed there were three attempts of elimination on me (and my family) combined with attempts of Iran war. I found these three attempts matched with the expiration of the warrantless wiretap too.
1. The warrantless wiretap law expired on 1/31/08. The effort of elimination by missile bombing - in the name of Asteroid 2007 TU24 would hit Earth on 1/24. An undersea cable was cut at the Iran door step on 1/23.
2. That wiretap law was extended 15 days hastilily from 2/1 to 2/15. Second elimination attempt by liquefaction earthquake - a two weeks' continuous rain followed by two earthquakes in my area on 2/4.
There was another undersea cable cut at the Irans doorstep on 2/3.
3. On 2/12, Senate passed to extend that eavesdropping law for another 6 years. It failed in the House. Why Feds didn't get it passed this time? I think maybe they were more confident on the third operation. The spy satellite would have more accurately crashed at target area. The Iran war would have been a big one with multi-nations to join, especially France. The third operation was a big one.
This is why I think Spitzer case was for reviving the warrantless eavesdropping law. After the three operations went soured, Feds renew their effort - reset their secret deal with China (to frame a case) and plan new case for Iran war. The harassment in internet is even more aggressive. It is a lawless rogue team. It took me hours to post an article in internet sometimes.
-------
546. New plot and India's role (3/24/08)
I was blocked to the internet. After I posted at one or two web sites, my computer would lose connection to internet and remain blocked for the whole day. This problem has been lasted for consecutive four days. (3/21 -3/24) It means my analysis is too accurate to be tolerated by Feds. They don't want other people know what I said. It also means there will be a new framed case coming. The time may be in early April.
My wife will go to Hongkong and China from 4/4 to 4/19. To my experience, each time there is a new plot, Feds used to arrange a tour for my relatives.
The last plot was planned at late February and early March - the time a spy satellite would drop to the Earth. It ended earlier after I revealed it was a missile murder plot on 2/8 and 2/13 and Pentagon announced they destroyed the satellite about 10 days later.
Feds immediately planed a new plot. As usual, China plays a role in it. This time India too. On 2/26, State Secretary Rice made a "hurricane" style visit to Bejing. She did the same work that Defense Secretary Gates had done three months ago. (see "519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07") A new deal was done. On same day, Gates went to India. India will play a role in this new secret deal. They will admit the terror bombing relates to Indian terrorists.
If you still remember, I talked about Feds introduce Indians into my area. They try to turn people away from the Chinese super market so it will be easier to run poisoned food. I found this and tried to buy in India market too to avoid poisoned food. (see "422. Poison food and Indian market (7/20/06) and
423. Mumbai bombing (7/25/06)") I think Feds then planned "Indian terrorist bombing" in my case.
The first symptom that the secret police cooperation between US and India could be found in Glasgow Airport terror case on 6/30/2007. (see, "495, Murder tactic, bombing the shopping center (7/8/07)) The suspects related to that case were Indians. As I said, false flag terror attack must be taken place under the regime which collaborate with the US. That's why there was no Al Qaida under Saddam's regime but it turns to be prosperous once Iraq is occupied by US. Because they can only be prosperous under the protect of the government. And you saw India joins with US in the game.
What is the payment? A nuclear energy deal. India is apparently beneficial from that deal because it will allow energy-starved India to buy nuclear fuel and technology on the world market to generate nuclear power. But US won't give it free unless the false flag terror attack would have been done. Then we saw a tricky way of that deal. The deal has never come to true since last year. The excuse is "Opposition within India has for months delayed the completion of the deal." The truth is that "opposition within India" will only disappear once there is a terror attack done related to Indian in San Jose area. Of course, since last year, I dare not to set foot in local India store.
Here is a news after Gates' visit to India. They renew the secret deal again.
Quote, "US gives India deadline on nuclear energy deal
By Somini Sengupta New York Times
A senior State department official on Wednesday gave India a three month deadline to complete negotiations on a landmark nuclear energy deal so that Congress can vote on the issue before its summer recess. "
(Mercury News 3/6/08)
Since the censorship for consecutive four days is unusual, I might be censored for longer time.
=============
#546 is the latest article I wrote on 3/24. Since then I was blocked to access to internet for more than a month. One thing is clear: What I said are thuth. Feds is afraid of it. (5/3/08. Sung) |
| |
06-08-08, 02:46 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 547. Plant "drug money" (5/17)
In 2006, my wife filed tax return with obvious error and sent it without my consent. I thought it was another Feds' plot of searching house in the name of "IRS raid". To avoid it, I had to separated my tax report from my wife. Then my wife deliberately emptied our joint bank account. When my relatives knew it, they helped me financially. Family help is Chinese tradition.
I met with my relatives this February. It was Chinese New Year. They gave me some cash. Mixed in small notes, there were some hundred dollars bill. I am sensitive at it. I have bitter experience with isotope money. I know it is used by Feds to track drug money. As a target, I also worry about to be planted with "drug money".
I still remember a news I read more than ten years ago. DEA raided a house at night. The home owner, a millionaire, thought the intruder were robbers, met them with gun. He was shot dead. The agent of DEA told judge that the reason they raided the house was because that millionaire spent a hundred note that marked in drug trade. My doubt is if there was a drug trade, why not to arrest at the scene? That whole case could be a deliberate murder with a planting of "drug money".
Several times I refused to accept hundred dollars bill. Once my mother came back from a Chinese tour, gave me three thousand dollars, said it was the gift money from my elder aunt in Shanghai. My elder aunt is a frugal woman. Three thousand US dollars was a lot of money for Chinese. It ran counter to her character and, they were all hundred dollars bill. Of course, I didn't accept it. I viewed it as attempt to plant. And this time, they mixed it with small bills. Was that a new attempt?
In late March and April, I was blocked to access internet. In April, rice price jumped double within days. News said people bought rice with tens of bags. It seems Feds tried to push me to spend these hundred dollars bill. They were so sure that I would be terminated that the judge (or prosecutor attorney) even approved internet censorship?
May 11, Sunday, was Mother's day. As usual, my family met together to celebrate it. I returned the hundred dollars bill to them. I would not say my point of view is hundred per cent correct. Strange enough, next day, May 12, internet re-opened for me. I could surf in it the whole day without big problem till today. (small harassing still exists.) Did a judge, or a DOJ attorney, or just the surveillance team itself decided to stop censorship because the "drug money" case doesn't exist any more? Or is it only a coincidence? Anyway, it's nice I can speak up again. All the occurrence may only prove what I said are truth. Feds is afraid of it.
548. Alex Jones, a kook or a hook (5/22)
On 5/19, in the afternoon, I read a news about Alex Jones which said Alex is a shill. I agree so. In this country, any opinion against the government used to be suppressed. Martin Luther King is a good example. (Even he is "politically correct" in the name) For those dissenters who can stand long time without problem, there used to be a purpose. I wrote a comment on that thread. Before I could finish it I encountered a problem to type a reply. I had to re-write it in the word-pad and cut and stick it to reply. Then I was blocked from internet the rest of that day. The blockade continued several hours the next day.
The event made me believe my point of view was correct. Here it is:
The news. Quote, "Alex Jones
An honest investigator of crimes?
Or a criminal trying to confuse us and protect his network?
Alex Jones is typical of investigators in this 9/11 truth movement. Specifically, he has been exposing 9/11 and other crimes for many years. He is an experienced investigator.
This page has some audio and video excerpts of Alex Jones to help you understand that he is trying to shift the blame away from Zionists and onto other people, mainly Americans, but also some British and Chinese. Most of the people and the "truth movement" are doing exactly as he does, so try to understand this technique so that you are not fooled by it. Alex Jones is a liar
My reply to someone who said Alex is a kook:
"Not a kook but a hook.
He pretends to be a host of 911 truth movement. To collect the witnesses information. And these information, likely go to the Feds office in the end.
Of course, in order to appeal the people who have real important information, what Alex Jones' report are mostly truth. A true bait to attract true bird.
For those who really have information that is fatal to this regime, you can imagine there is a disastrous end for them.
This is an evil country in the name of democracy. Be careful people."
Feds used to disguise as a booty buyer to trap thieves and robbers. They use the same tactic to collect information of 911 witnesses. So in debate they can ask: "Where is witness?". Because real witnesses are eliminated by "natural death" or cancer or accidents. Absolute power leads to absolute corruption. No check and balance makes Feds a dangerous criminal. |
| |
06-08-08, 02:46 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 549. Plant "drug shoes"? (5/27/08)
On 5/11, my relatives came to my home. They picked me up for a shopping ride. After I finished the food shopping, we went to KOHL Store. I want to buy a pair of shoes.
While I walked around to watch and test shoes, my brother suddenly urged me to go home. He said others were waiting us to go for the dinner. He said he had extra shoes to give me to save my money. So we went home. That night he gave me three pairs of shoes. The size fits my foot.
They were all used ones. Some even worn out with holes. I washed them thoroughly days later.
Then I noticed something unusual in surveillance team in my area. There are new faces to replace the old ones and they are aggressive. I wonder if they frame a new case of "drug shoes"? I thought of "shoe bomber" story. That was an authority's frame case full of flaw 6 years ago. The work was much more of a 007 story done by laboratory of intelligence because it needed special explosives and fine work than to be done by a homeless with mental problem.(see PROBLEMS SURFACE WITH SHOE BOMBER STORY PROBLEMS SURFACE WITH SHOE BOMBER STORY) So will this time Feds create a case of drug shoes? Consider Feds almost exhaust all their resource to frame a case against me, it's quite possible. (only for the purpose to close the traffic of Bay Bridge, last year they plotted 1. Burning down a main Bridge exit Highway 580 by an oil tanker on 4/29/07 2. Collapsed Minneapolis Bridge to justify the close up of Bay Bridge in 8/30-9/1/07. In the name that Bridge needed a repair. 3. Tried to collapse Bay Bridge by hitting Bridge's supporter with a boat Cosco Busan. on 11/7/07.) There is no difference between planting drug shoes and planting drug money. Although it doesn't make sense to deliver drug in empty shoe heels. After all, there is no Custom to watch, why made such a dramatic operation?
I don't think my brother touches drugs. And I washed these shoes thoroughly. How can Feds make a drug shoe case? Only by planting. After I washed the shoes, my wife took out a box, asked me if I want to store them. She used to put extra shoes in garage. The garage is separated from the house and easy to access. That's an ideal place for planting. Her suggestion reminds me of the frame case. I refused. I am home all day long, surfing the internet. How can Feds intrude my house to plant drug shoe? The only chance is when I go out to shopping food on week ends. Then I did a test. Last week end, I stay at home. For consecutive three days, (last week end was memorial day long week end) my wife went out every day and ate outside. I think my speculation is correct. Because my wife used to be home on week ends, cooking food. especially these days when gas price is so high. I think Feds arranged her absence. It gave Feds a chance to intrude the house to plant if I went out shopping.
This is why I view the Fourth Amendment so important and warrantless surveillance so evil. It gives corrupt Feds chance to plant and frame innocent people.
550. Cyclone in Burma (6/2/08)
A cyclone attacked Burma on May 3, 08. I looked at the path of the cyclone. It went along the coast of South Burma, then finished in Thailand. I think it was created by Pentagon. A climate modification needs spreading of chemical, how could Pentagon operate it in Burma - an unfriendly country? The cyclone path told everything. It was easy to create a cyclone in ocean area, then push it on to a designated path by creating an target area of low air pressure - in this case it was Thailand. Thailand is an ally of US. Its military collaborated with Pentagon actively in Vietnam war. So it was easy to produce a low air pressure space over there. And the south coast of Burma is the nearest area to the international air. Where planes could spread chemical to modify the moving of the cyclone.
About three years ago I have said hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita were artificial weather system created by Feds in frame case against me. Though Feds activated its accessories to repudiate the weather modification technique, more and more information prove the weather control skill. Here is one:
Quote, "Navy Research Paper: 'Disrupt Economies' with Man-Made 'Floods,' 'Droughts' |
February 11, 2008
By Noah Shachtman
Hurricane_andrew A recently-unearthed U.S. Navy research project calls for creating mad-made floods and droughts to "disrupt [the] economy" of an enemy state.
"Weather modification was used successfully in Viet Nam to (among other things) hinder and impede the movement of personnel and material from North Viet Nam to South Viet Nam," notes a Naval Air Warfare Weapons Division - China Lake research proposal, released last month through the Freedom of Information Act. But "since that time military research on Weather Modification has dwindled in the United States."
The proposal suggests a study of the latest weather manipulation techniques, to "give the U.S. military a viable, state-of-the-art weather modification capability again." With that in hand, American forces would be able...
To impede or deny the movement of personnel and material because of rains-floods, snow-blizzards, etc.
(2) To disrupt economy due to the effect of floods, droughts, etc.
....... Navy Research Paper: 'Disrupt Economies' with Man-Made 'Floods,' 'Droughts' | Danger Room from Wired.com
There is no doubt US has ability to manipulate the weather. But is it just to "disrupt [the] economy" of an enemy state this time? No, there is other purpose. One thing unusual this time is media aggressively reported Burmese disaster, accusing Burma government for rejecting international aid, or allowing limited help, or controlling aid. Someone even suggests to invade Burma to punish its negligence of people. Will it develop to another Iraq style invasion? A wolf always finds reason to eat a lamb. But it's ridiculous to invade with such a reason. Should US be invaded for its negligence in Katrina disaster?
Burma was once famous for its opium trading business. To invade Burma, or put a pressure on it, is it more appropriate to invade Burma by accusation of drug smuggling than by accusation of negligence of a natural disaster? But US doesn't mention a word on drug smuggling. Why?
It is a case to push Burma regime to revive drug trading, I allege. (to be continued) |
| |
06-17-08, 08:13 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 551. Big drug case plotted in May (6/9/08)
Burma was famous for its drug business. The opium production area is in Golden Triangle. It connects to south-west China. The drug lord is Khun Sa.
Burma's regime - Juntas - once benefited from the opium business, I believe. But recently less and less news relates drugs to Burma. Burma is quitting from that notorious business. Even when US media in their negative propaganda against Burma, the charge were: dictatorship; persecuting monks; jailing democratic activists; neglecting cyclone refugees. There is no word mentioning about drug business. (or they deliberately neglect it.)
Why did Burma quit from its drug business? I think its regime is afraid of an attack from the US. Juntas abandoned Rangoon as its capital and moved inside. Especially when US invaded Iraq for some fake reason - WMD. Several months ago, I learned from news paper that Khun Sa died in Burma's capital. The drug lord's death may indicate that the Junta finally cut its relationship with the drug group. Then it comes the cyclone.
Why US pressured Burma that much? Because they want Burma to cooperate in the coming framed drug case. To play a role of the heroine supplier and a witness. The role China tried to be avoid of. Though Chinese secret police helped US to frame a case by planting the drugs in commercial shipment in my brother in law's normal trading. Here is the secret deal of that original case plotted in April 2001.
Quote, "A top official of DEA, as a signatory and guarantor, assures they will use their best efforts and most merited personnel to prevent any publicity in the mass media news outlets, of any problems to be publicly discussed, as to "China White", the high-purity dope from Southwest China funneling into the U.S.. And the censorship is to continue at least until one year after the expected Red China hosting of the International Olympics. The DEA official agrees that his agency will restrict their public comments on dope traffic interdictions to Mexico, Colombia, Nigeria, and related locations and not mention Southwest China, or the term "China White". A top official of FBI Counter-Intelligence Division, is a guarantor and signatory to these embargo provisions." Sherman Skolnick's Report
The Southwest China is where China connects to Gold Triangle of Burma. The framed case went soured one after another. And one after another the Feds revived a new one. The planned May case this year is the biggest ever I saw. It came with the rice price jumping; cyclone in Burma and big earthquake in Sichuan China.
(Once again I was blocked to internet. I was blocked the whole day on 6/6 and hours in other days. I fear there will be a raid if I wear the shoe out (my brother's gift) or pay the cash for food shopping. (though my relatives changed the big bill into small notes for me.) I also fear there may be a violence plotted on me as Feds are so eager to finish the case.
Kat Sung 6/9/08)
552. Setting off an earthquake is mature technique (6/14/08)
In February, Chinese New Year, when I united with my family, my relatives gave me some cash. I think Feds planted drug money in them to justify an arrest. Feds were so sure that they would be success to frame the case this time that they even censored me from the internet the following months until May 11. (They opened internet for me on May 12) To push me spending the money, they even pushed up the rice price in April.(rice is my main food) Within days, rice price doubled. However, I managed not to spend that money.
Now it is clear that Feds made May the month for big action. On May 3, there was a cyclone in Burma - a pressure on Burma regime to force it play a role of witness for coming drug case. May 11 was the action day. It was Mother's day when family members got together to have a dinner. My relatives rode me for a shopping trip. It used to be a big shopping day for me since I can't drive. (no drive license) Feds must have expected I spend the "drug money" in the shopping spree.
Everything was in proceeding except I didn't spend the money. I gave it back to them after the shopping and expressed my fear. But I made a mistake to take gift shoes from my brother that night. I am under tight surveillance that Feds won't let go any chance to plant.
China was in proceeding too. Next day - May 12 - there was a magnitude 8.0 earthquake in Sichuan China. The event became a big issue which attracts Chinese attention from domestic to abroad the following weeks. If I spent the "drug money" on May 11, there would be a slaughter on my relatives in China. The earthquake, was planned to distract public's attention from these cases.
Setting off an earthquake is a mature technique. Last August Feds had one in Peru on purpose to justify a trip accident for my family members. Reference:
1. On 8/13/07, I wrote in #502, worried about accident: "Next day on 8/9, my wife said she would have a trip to Peru between 8/16 to 8/22. My brother and one of my sister will go with her..... One of murder tactic of Feds is travel accident. Each big plot always came with this program. So they prepare again the death for part of my family members. As for me,....."
2. One day later, there was a magnitude 7.5 quake in Peru (8/15). Here is what I wrote On 8/18. "503. Earthquake in Peru (8/18/07)
Then there was an earthquake in Peru on 8/15. Of course I view it as part of the August plot. It would be used to justify a tour accident.
That night, I asked my wife what time tomorrow would she leave home for Peru. She happily said, "No, we won't go. Don't you know there is just a 7.5 earthquake in Peru?" Her happy expression revealed it was not a trip she likes to go. I was puzzled. Was it a big coincidence that an earthquake taken place the day before the trip? To my opinion, the quake was created to justify a tour accident, not to cancel that planned trip. Did I make a mistake?
I didn't make mistake. Later that night, after several call, my wife said she still would go. She said the tour guider from Lima confirmed nothing serious happened there. Everything was OK. She left next morning."
Feds act aggressively these days. I worry they will apply violence on me. It can be road accident, bombing in shopping center, fire on gas station, robbery accident...... |
| |
07-08-08, 06:33 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 553. Sichuan quake used as a diversion (6/19/08)
People may doubt how can China set off a big earthquake to kill its own citizens and made a big loss in economy. There is other side they didn't know.
1. Government never care the lives of its own citizen when they consider other interest is more important than people's lives. Such story like: In World War II, British government let City Coventry be destroyed by air bombing of German, though they knew the raid information in advance. In 911, 3000 people killed in a false flag attack. So was this earthquake in Sichuan, China. (There is still a big difference from Coventry bombing to the 911 and Sichuan earthquake. The latter two were done by its own government.)
2. I think the practice of earthquake may indicate Pentagon has transferred the quake technique to the Chinese military. That is a big payment. From TV and newspaper, I heard from both the news that the military industry factories in earthquake area have got quake warning in advance and are able to avoid from a loss. There is still no scientific way to forecast a quake except it's an artificial one.
3. The biggest advantage for China is obvious and was reported by US media.
Quote, " Quake mutes protests over Beijing Olympics
China reaps goodwill in wake of tragedy
By Stephen Wade, Associated Press
Beijing - China's deadly earthquake may have saved the Beijing Olympics.
Just a few weeks ago, International Olympic Committee President Jacques Rogge described the games as "in crisis." They were being battered by pro-Tibet protests, health concerns about Beijing's noxious pollution and calls for boycotts tied to China's support for Sudan.
The May 12 earthquake changed everything. ......
After the tragedy in Sichuan province, the Games are now riding a wave of goodwill - a feeling that the government's propaganda machine had failed for months to generate. "
(Mercury News May 24, 2008)
4. Quick response may indicate it's a pre-prepared event. There is a quick military response. Troops were moved in to rescue the suffering people. There is also a quick media response.
Quote, "Activist groups grudgingly acknowledge that China's state-controlled media - by allowing uncharacteristic openness in 24-hour earthquake coverage - have shaped the news agenda and gained sympathy for the catastrophe. ....
Know for this secrecy, the government has let earthquake coverage flow more freely, with less censorship in an era of quick-moving text messages and the Internet. ..." (Mercury News 5/24/08)
China was once a close up country, just like Burma's juntas. Does the sudden change mean a more open government? Or as I say, it is used as a diversion to another case.
554. Payment Taiwan and cross deal (6/24/08)
Another payment for China's cooperation in framed case is Taiwan. Taiwan was ruled by Democratic Progressive Party - a party advocates to separate from Mainland China - for eight years until this May. D.P.P. couldn't get the control of Taiwan without the support of the US. An independent Taiwan is obviously an US interest. But it is a headache for China. China threatens to start a war if Taiwan dares to claim a formal independence.
So in the secret deal between US and China, Taiwan always is a chip. The former president of Taiwan - Chen Shuibian, became a murder target several times. (see #358, 367, 382. The life of the President of Taiwan as a payment (2/2/06), 383. The cross murder deal (2/7/06)).
Early this year, the deal to change Taiwan regime was reached. D.P.P. was humiliated by continuous scandal. It lost March election to the National Party - a party has never formally renounced a desire for eventual unification with China. New Taiwan president inaugurated on May 20. It coincident with the May plot.
On Jan 26, a news in Chinese Newspaper caught my eye. It said Senator of Hongkong - Mr. Wang Yihong failed in election to be the Representative of Hongkong to attend the People's Delegate Congress of China. It also hinted that Wang Yihong would lose his senator seat too in the coming legislative election. Wang Yihong is a cousin of my wife. He has been a chip in the secret deal before. (see 392. 12/2 plot to murder Mr. Wang Yi Hong (3/15/06)) So I realize another secret deal was done between China and US. What was the exchange? I got it two weeks later.
House Representative Tom Lantos died on Feb.11. Tom Lantos was the Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Know for his strong advocacy for human rights. Mercury News said, "After being diagnosed with cancer of the esophagus in late December, Lantos announced he would not seek re-election in his district."
Lantos, as a senior politician, must know the principle of the game. He knew he became a chip in the game and announced the retirement. He wished to save his life by retreating from the game. But deal was the deal. From diagnosed with cancer (late December) to his death (Feb 11), it took only six weeks - a rapid death - or a very efficient murder by Feds.
Lantos was referred as "anti-China Congressman" or "China black" by Chinese media. He was a stronghold of pro-Taiwan independence power. His death was a warning to that power and a procedure to the coming regime change of Taiwan government in May. |
| |
07-08-08, 06:34 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 555. Olympic deal (6/29/08)
The secret deal between the secret police of the China and the US to frame a case was signed in April 2001 in the name to release the crew of a US spy-plane. For the first time I sensed Feds was framing a drug case against me. The negotiation to release the spy plane crew should be the business of Pentagon. How could the signatory and guarantor be agents of DEA and FBI? They guaranteed that media wouldn't report about a drug (likely heroin) smuggling from southwest China. (the source likely was from Burma) The payment was huge. The information said it was 40 billion. Later I realized it was a value equivalence - China was granted to be host of 2008 Olympic and the membership of WTO. Now we can see how big that payment is. After China becomes a member of WTO, its economy develops rapidly and today China is the third economic power of the world. The benefit is much more than 40 billion. Since that was a bad deal to US - it helps its rival country, China growing strong, both the directors of DEA and FBI announced resignation that month. (April 2001)
The action date of that first plot was 6/11/2001. Feds arranged it the execution day of McVeigh who was accused of OKC bombing. That was the first time I learned the tactic of Feds - they used to create a big event to distract the framed case. Since then from my story you can find how Feds follows this model. The latest one was the magnitude 8 earthquake in Sichuan China.
Hosting Olympic game is no doubt a big deal. Japan rose to be a big economic power in the world after it hosted the Olympic Game in 1960s. China wishes to be benefit in same way. In April, China started its Olympic torch parade abroad, hoped to be honored by world power glory. But it is too innocent. Instead of reputation, China was humiliated severely. The Olympic torch parade was protested everywhere in the world by human right group and pro-Tibet independence people, especially in Britain and France. At last, China had to shrink the parade and end it in a low profile.
Olympic chip is big. US won't let it go without some kickback. Now it is clear US want to have some payback at that deal: the influence on Sudan (important for its oil production), the independence of Tibet, the independence of Taiwan. Chen Shuibian - former Taiwan president who advocates Taiwan independence, had said that 2008 was the only big chance for Taiwan independence because China would host Olympic Games at that year. US has prepared everything to extort the Olympic deal. Only because China put Taiwan as its first priority and made a demand in later deals, Taiwan's independence was sacrificed. But China didn't expect there were other tricks. Thus we saw a big humiliation in Olympic torch parade. Olympic is in crisis. Celebrities refuse to attend the ceremony because China violates the humane rights. Athletes may boycott because of air pollution. To save the Game, there came the May 12 Sichuan earthquake. The date was well timed. Feds got a distract for its May 11 plot.
Feds tried to finish the case in May because thus there will be two months left for them to extort more from Olympic game. I think one is to demand China's support of Iran war.
556. Petro-dollar, the cause of Iran war (7/4/08)
People think the nuclear ambition of Iran is the reason for Iran war. That is only right on Israel's part. For US part, it is petro-dollar.
US dollar is appointed currency in oil trading. Because the oil trade is a huge business, a large amount of dollar is locked up in that trade. That money is called petro-dollar. Why it is so important to US? Because it acts as a long term none interest loan The prosperous US economy partly was based on the petro-dollar - a long term loan without interest. Let me depict it in this way:
US bought a house from Japan (whom represents the oil customers of Iran) for one million dollars. US also bought another house from France (whom represents other oil customers of OPEC) for one million dollars. Japan and France use these two million dollars as fund to buy oil. The money was used in oil trading circle and never back to US. US enjoys the two houses almost free. He doesn't have to pay monthly mortgage payment. Not a penny for interest, nor for principle. All the cost was the printing of a green back paper. However, that green back paper - petro dollar, is still a debit note. How long is it? So far it's more than forty years - since dollar became the appointed oil trade currency.
But suddenly, Iran refuses to accept dollar. Japan has to ask US to exchange that one million dollar into Euro or yen. What US can do is: 1. to get the dollar back by export more merchandise. But he is not able to. He has a trade deficit already. 2. To get the dollar back with gold or foreign currency reserve. But he hasn't that much reserve. 3. To lock up that extra one million dollar in US Bond by raising the interest rate to attract the buyer. But he unwilling to do it. There is a sub-prime crisis in real estate market. Any interest increase will further devalue the house. Feds holds a large amount of real estates in my case, they don't allow such thing to happen. So to solve the problem, they go to the fourth option. 4. By pushing up the oil price.
France (other oil consumption countries) keeps one million dollar as oil trading fund. How much does he need if the oil price doubled? Two million. Thus the one million dollar Japan abandoned is absorbed by France. That's why the oil price jumped like crazy in recent days - a tricky way to keep US dollar from collapsing.
US has to pay for high oil price too. Ordinary people bear the cost. But the high oil price will hurt the economy. The condition won't last long. So war on Iran is unavoidable.
Of course, US is a "democratic" country. It can't start a war because others refusing to use its currency. Then beware of another 911 style false flag attack.
We know there was an incident of live nuclear head weapons being carried over the continental US by a B-52 last August. There is attempt of dirty bomb attack in Houston this year.
Quote, "State of Emergency: The US in the Final Six Months of the George W. Bush Administration
by Lewis Seiler and Dan Hamburg
June 13, 2008 by CommonDreams.org
.......
Former National Security Agency analyst and naval intelligence officer Wayne Madsen has been in Houston investigating the Carnaby case at great personal risk. Madsen believes Carnaby was involved both in heading off a potential war with Iran (by leaking Mossad plans to assassinate Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah just days before Carnaby himself was killed) and in trying to forestall a potential terrorist attack on the port.
According to Madsen, “federal agents in Houston fear that ‘another 9/11-type part false flag’ attack is imminent, perhaps as early as July 4.”....... State of Emergency: The US in the Final Six Months of the George W. Bush Administration - CommonDreams.org
Another time factor for Iran war is the Olympic Game in August. China has interest in Iran. He is an oil customer of Iran. Olympic Game could be an extortion chip for China's support in Iran war. |
| |
07-17-08, 05:46 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 557. The development of Iran affair (7/9/08)
On 6/30 and 7/1, State Secretary Condoleezza Rice had a lightening visit to China. So I knew there was a new secret deal signed by China and US secret police. There was a quick result of that deal: On 7/3, White House announced that Bush would attend the opening ceremony of Olympic in Beijing. Other world leaders, such like Merkel of Germany and Gordon Brown of Britain, are skipping the opening ceremony to protest China's violation on human rights in Tibet and Sudan.
The main purpose of the secret deal is to continue to frame a drug case. Does it include that China will support Iran war?
Quietly, US is preparing for another Mid-east war.
Quote, "Iran War Resolution May Be Passed Next Week
June 23, 2008 by Eric Garris
Introduced less than a month ago, Resolution 362 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hc110-362>, also known as the Iran War Resolution, could be passed by the House as early as next week.
The bill is the chief legislative priority of AIPAC. On its Web site, AIPAC endorses the resolutions as a way to ”Stop Iran’s Nuclear Program” <http://aipac.org/694.asp> and tells readers to lobby Congress to pass the bill. In the Senate, a sister resolution, Resolution 580 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-580>, has gained co-sponsors with similar speed. The Senate measure was introduced by Indiana Democrat Evan Bayh on June 2. It has since gained 19 co-sponsors.
The bill’s key section “demands that the president initiate an international effort to immediately and dramatically increase the economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities by, inter alia, prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran’s nuclear program.” Antiwar.com Blog Iran War Resolution May Be Passed Next Week
Iran surely has felt the approaching danger and made a response on July 4th.
Quote, "Iran responds to nuclear package
Friday, July 04, 2008
Iran has responded to a packages of incentives offered by six world powers aimed at resolving a standoff over its disputed nuclear ambitions, according to the official IRNA news agency. Al Jazeera English - Middle East - Iran responds to nuclear package
Iran's constructive preliminary response is positive. But it's a dismay to warmonger. They lose an important excuse to start a war. It disturbs their war schedule. So US media treat the news with a low key and drop the news in the corner. However, the market reaction is inspiring. From 7/5 to 7/8, the oil price dropped for four days from $145 to $136 a barrel. .
558. D.A.'s discipline case and hiding evidence (7/9/08)
On 5/11, I returned the hundred notes to my relatives when they visited me. They later changed them into small notes for me. I posted "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17)" on 5/17. Two days later, there was a news in "San Jose Mercury" that caught my eye. Topic "Field/ Prosecutor faces rare hearing". It was a rare story to discipline a D.A..
Field is a D.A. of Santa Clara County. He is accused of disobeying court orders, hiding the location of an exculpatory witness and abusing his authority in three other cases. Field was alleged that "he intentionally withheld Smith's whereabouts from the rape defendant's lawyer because he feared it would hurt his own case. When Smith was eventually located, he provided information that helped lead to dismissal of the rape charge." (San Jose Mercury, 5/24/08)
In another word, he hid evidence to frame a case. Then I think of the "drug money". I allege Feds has planted the "drug money" on me through the hands of my relatives. They knew it is a framed case, the "drug money" was not from the "drug trading". But they hide the truth at the purpose to eliminate a witness whom will endanger their criminal kingdom. They don't care to disciple a D.A. as a scapegoat in the wrong doing so long as to eliminate a target of their most wanted.
Was Field the one who gave Feds the legal advice to the framed case on me? If the case broke off, they can add another offence under the Field's name, that is convenient. What Field may get is disciplined from practicing of attorney. Or his case is just used as a cover up story to influence the public's mind that such kind of wrong doing is popular practice? What I realized is that Feds now let local D.A. office and D.E.A. do the "drug money" planting case.
On 6/12, there was another news about Field. "Prosecutor's legal woes worsen in new finding". It says "Field acted in a "deceptive and reprehensible manner" by revealing information to the jury in violation of the trial judge's order in that case." (San Jose Mercury, by Leslie Griffy, 6/12/08) New finding will drag on the disciplinary case. What I realized is that Feds will still use "drug money" to frame the case. That means they don't limit "drug money" on hundred note. They extend it to small notes.
Really, two days later, on 6/15, (it was father's day), my relatives came again and took me for another big shopping spree. Anyhow, I don't want to add another offence on Field's discipline case,
I don't touch the money my relatives gave me, even they are small notes. I believe they were from Feds. And in super markets, I found I was heavily surrounded by agents, they disguised as clients and store employees. They made that shopping day a big action day.
Not only the Field's discipline case and heavy surveillance alarmed me, also there is another news reminding me Feds is continuing to frame a case on "drug money". |
| |
07-27-08, 07:15 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 559. Plan to murder in the name of "Bank robbery" (7/19/08)
On 5/11, Feds arranged a big shopping spree day for me at the purpose that I would spend the "drug money". I didn't. On the contrary, I returned the 100 dollar bill to my relatives, they later change the big bill into small notes for me.
On 5/17, I wrote, "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17) ".
On 5/20, the Mercury News reported a D.A.'s discipline case. It was about a D.A. who deliberately hid the evidence to frame a case. I think it was used to justify the framed case on me. I am under 24/7 surveillance. Feds must have reported that I have no job and no income. It is truth. But they must have hid the fact I was aided by my relatives. As a matter of fact, the money must be from the Feds and given to me through the hands of my relatives. Eager to eliminate a witness of their crime, Feds will do anything in their desperation.
Then on 5/23, a man was shot in the head after banking. He died 10 days later. The shooting robbery, I think, was organized by Feds at the purpose to justify a coming murder in the name of bank robbery. When I refuse to use the money from the Feds but go to withdraw the cash from my bank account, they will shoot me in a planned "bank robbery".
The news repeated 10 days later. "The man shot in the head in May robbery dies". And on next day: "A bank is offering a $10,000 reward for information on the death of a customer who was shot and killed outside a San Jose branch office." (Mercury News, 6/6/08) I allege the murder was done by Feds. Killing is unnecessary in bank robbery, let alone to shoot in the head. It was a deliberate "shoot to kill". Feds need a death to cover up another coming "shoot to kill" death.
To create similar incidents to cover up the main plot is a tactic Feds often used. So the main plot would not be so prominent. It is a kind of pre-distraction. Here are two cases I've talked about.
1. In the first secret deal of 2001, the action date was 6/11/01, (marked by the execution of McVeigh.) Feds also planned to murder my nephew - a student of Stanford University.(In the name of racial shooting death.) The pre-distraction operation was to create a random shooting death of another Asian student. She was shot in the head outside Stanford University on 6/10/01. See detail at "63. A well planed frame case".
2. In the January plot of 2007, in which my daughter was a target too. Feds created "May Zhou's suicide". A pre-distraction to a planned murder on my daughter.(In the name of "suicide", I allege.) See detail in "467. Attempt to murder my daughter (2/15/07)".
On 6/15, Feds arranged another big shopping spree day for me. Two days before 6/15, they repeated their tactic by pre-distract mind influence:
1. Re-fresh D.A. Field's discipline case. Quote, "Prosecutor's legal woes worsen in new finding". (Mercury News, 6/12/08)
2. Quote, "(Milpitas) Serial bank robber strikes for 12th time". "FBI officials say a serial bank robber who has hit banks in Fremont, Union City, Milpitas and Livermore held up the Commercial Bank on South Park Victoria Drive in Milpitas on Tuesday. (One of my two bank accounts happened to be on that Drive too)......Anyone with information about these incidents is asked to call the FBI at (415)553-7400". (Mercury News, 6/13/08)
The tactic of Feds is very clear. Force me to use the "drug money" they planted and make an arrest. If I don't do in their way and withdraw money from the bank, then they planned a "shoot to death" for me. Of course people are asked to call FBI if they have information. What people don't know is the crime may have been planned by the hand works in same office they are requested to call in. That's why the serial robber could strike on and on. Just like Osama Bin Laden could issue terror warning from time to time and never been captured. Because they work for the interest of the Feds.
560. Distraction - wildfire (7/24/08)
Feds used to arrange a big event - a war, a disaster such like hurricane Katrina; big earthquake like Sichuan 8 magnitude quake; a pandemic such like SARS or bird flu; or a killing such like Virginia Tech shooting - to divert public notice. In recent "drug money" frame case, the distraction is wildfire.
On 5/23, Mercury News warned, "Preparation paying off for Cal Fire". "Fire / Unreasonably early wildfire" which said ""This is way early," said Saratoga Fire Capt. Bil Morrison. "Usually we expect this in September or October."". The unreasonably fire start off first in area nearby San Jose. It used to be contained within days. Then new wildfire was found somewhere else. It continued for two months.
At first, suspicion came with these fires. On 5/31, in Mercury News, there was an article, "Permits to burn: Are they too risky". The largest fire in Santa Cruz county in a century was alleged caused by deliberately debris burning. On 6/15, "Officials seek man in Bonny Doon Blaze" which said, "California Department of Forestry and Fire protection officials released a sketch of a clean-cut man with a nearly shaved head. Investigators believe the man may know something about how the fire started.". On 6/21, "Blaze destroys 15 buildings, may have been set intentionally" said, "callers notified emergency dispatchers about 2 p.m. of a motorist setting spot fires at four or five areas along the highway."
This news may well explained the cause of the wildfire. What callers might not see was there were probably more spot fires set by the motorist(s). One month later, the news became, "Since a huge lightening storm on June 21, about 2,010 separate fires have ignited across California."("Bush visits California to survey wildfires", Mercury News, 7/18/08)
Briefing news on 7/18 and 7/19 said that 98% of state's fires extinguished. Only at this time, I knew how big this distraction was. News said 25,000 firefighters from other 41 states, and from Canada, Greece, Australia, New Zeland and Mexico have been working to combat the fires. Schwarzenegger said 80% of the US fire resources for fire fighting are deployed in California. I dare to say this was the biggest operation of fire fighting ever have happened in the world. Yet, have you noticed it a bit? The government, the media covered it up so tightly that only at the last moment, we got it by a few words in briefing news. They finished it in a very low profile. Because a framed "drug money" case didn't happen to their plan.
I think if I spent the "drug money", there would be a series of arrest and deaths in detain. At same time, a biggest than ever fire would developed. Thousands of families would lose their home. Hundred of thousands of people would be mandatary evacuated. People in the world would watch the blame and smoke and heroic firefighters in TV news. Nobody would notice a few drug arrest and mystical death. Or it simply is left alone by media. Several weeks later, nobody notice some murder had happened. On 6/29, in first page of the Mercury News, there was a big color map of San Jose. The city is surrounded by orange and red color suburban area. (the color represents fire hazards is high and very high) The big topic is: "Is your home in danger?". That is typical pre-mind occupation intimidation. A preparation for the coming big fire on San Jose.
In Mother's day, (5/11) Feds arranged a big shopping spree for me and prepared a big earthquake (Sichuan quake) next day (5/12) to distract. It failed. Feds expected I would spent the small notes they planted through my relatives anytime later. What distract they prepared this time? An unreasonable wild fire from. From deliberately debris burning, to arson which finally was replaced by "natural cause"(lightening), it continued for two months. On 7/9, I posted "558. D.A.'s discipline case and hiding evidence (7/9/08)" revealed the small drug notes plot. The case went soured. Until then I learned Feds had prepared a biggest then ever wild fire and an unprecedented troops of 25,000 firefighters. The great plan ends like a mouse' tail. What a sorrow. Or how fortunate are those people who would otherwise lose their homes or even their lives. |
| |
08-07-08, 08:35 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: 11-22-08 08:02 PM
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Surveillance without warrant and August plot 561. San Francisco bank robbery (3) (7/29/08) (continue to #404)
The bank robbery I talked about in #559 is the third attempt on me. Twice Feds had planned a shooting death plot on me in the name of bank robbery. One was on 4/13/2006. see "400. Bank robbery created for "mis-shooting" (4/20/06)". The other one was earlier on 1/15/1999. See "402. Bank robbery in San Francisco (1) (4/25/06) " and "404. Bank robbery in San Francisco (2) (5/5/06)" The description hasn't finished. Here I refer the last part of #404: "It was about 5 o'clock when I arrived at San Francisco. As usual, I went to the subway station in Montgomery St. where I would take an underground tram to my parents' house.
It was not far away from the train terminal to the subway station. I still took a bus. The bus stopped at its first station. It couldn't move any further. The street was crowded with people. It was dark already. The buildings along the street coated with red color because there were so many police cars with their emergency lamps on.
All passengers left the bus. I went into the crowd and learned that minutes ago there was a bank robbery in Montgomery St.. Some people died in gun battle. I felt chill in my back. Was that gun battle prepared for me after they failed a plot to kill by car accident? Later the news report strengthened my opinion."
Continuation: Later, from media I learned the following story.
Buford White, the bank robber, "walks into the Bank of America branch at New Montgomery and Market streets shortly after 5 p.m. waves a big gun around and orders everybody to hit the ground. A good Samaritan jumps him and tries to wrestle the gun away. The hero gets shot twice in the face. The robber then had a gun fighting with the responding police... and spilled out into the street, where dozens of shots were exchanged." It ends with White's death and two policemen's wounding. the Good Samaritan, had been shot in the head and remains in serious condition.
1. Buford White had committed a series of bank robbery, but never been arrested even FBI had tips.
Quote, " Ex-con killed in robbery tied to other bank heists
Jim Herron Zamora, Examiner, 01/18/99
Investigators suspect that an ex-convict killed in a gunfight with police after a botched bank robbery in San Francisco on Friday may have led a ring responsible for a series of up to 10 similar heists in various Bay Area cities. "Buford White is a suspect..."
Quote, "FBI Had Tip Before Fatal Shootout
Agency was probing suspect in series of bank robberies
Jaxon Van Derbeken, Chronicle Staff Writer
Thursday, February 4, 1999
FBI spokesman George Grotz said the tip alone was not enough to arrest White before the holdup at a Bank of America at Market and New Montgomery streets."
2. The hero was discredited as a bad guy in later media description.
Quote, "Bank hero faced with rebuilding life - again
Seth Rosenfeld and Elizabeth Fernandez, OF THE EXAMINER STAFF
Thursday, January 28, 1999
Castillo, shot in robbery, has tried to overcome problems with violence, alcohol, reckless driving
SAN FRANCISCO --
When he tackled an armed robber in a crowded downtown San Francisco bank and was shot in the head, they say, he'd come a long way in fighting his own problems with violence and alcohol, as well as reckless driving that had caused another motorist's death. ......
Exactly what prompted Castillo to jump the armed bandit is unclear, law-enforcement officials noted.
Castillo could not have known that the suspect, Buford White, also was a suspect in 10 other bank robberies and, aside from domestic abuse, was not known to be violent. The vast majority of bank robberies do not involve shooting, according to the FBI. .......
On July 11, 1991, he pleaded guilty to vehicular manslaughter, drunken driving and accidentally causing a death. .......
On Aug. 10, he pleaded guilty to a traffic infraction in that case and was released on one year's probation on the condition that he obey all laws, the records show. ......
He pleaded no contest to misdemeanor assault with a deadly weapon. On April 4, 1996, he was ordered to spend 32 days in Santa Rita County Jail and ......
On Aug. 11, 1997, Fremont police spotted Castillo tailgating another car in heavy traffic and pulled him over. They saw symptoms indicating that he was high on methamphetamine. ....."
3. Police captain died hours after his squad killed the robber.
Quote, "Cop died after shootout - is recalled as hero
Mackenzie Warren and Erin McCormick, OF THE EXAMINER STAFF Julian Guthrie of The Examiner staff contributed to this report.
Sunday, January 17, 1999
Capt. Stasko may have fallen asleep at wheel before crash
SAN FRANCISCO -- San Francisco Capt. George "Jake" Stasko, one of The City's top cops, was killed early Saturday in a one-car crash hours after he led his squad in a dramatic shootout with a suspect in a downtown bank robbery.
Police spokesman Sherman Ackerson said Capt. Stasko had remained at the police command post until about 9:30 p.m. after the 5:15 p.m. shootout. Ackerson said the captain then organized a meeting of his unit and apparently stayed in San Francisco after the investigation for several more hours."
After I learned all these information, I concluded this bank robbery was prepared for me. I'll put my analysis in next message.
562. San Francisco bank robbery (4) (8/3/08)
When I learned from the repair shop that the car my family depended on was in dangerous situation, I decided immediately to buy a new car. On 1/15/1999, I went to the auto dealers to buy a new car. The Feds saw the murder attempt through a car accident went soured, they activated another murder project which had been planned already - a shooting death in the name of bank robbery.
Of course, Buford White must be an asset of the FBI, so he started a bank robbery at a time and location that any bank robber would try to avoid. The bank branch he chose was at the busiest area of San Francisco. Five o'clock on Friday was a rush hour of the city. But it was a location nearest to the entrance of subway station I would go and it was the time the train (I took) arrived at.
According to FBI, Buford White, aside from domestic abuse, was not known to be violent. The vast majority of bank robberies do not involve shooting. But on that day, he "waves a big gun". What caused his unusually behavior? Because Feds needed a gun fighting that day to make a coming shooting death reasonable. White was not necessarily to be the shooter. In such case, like President Kennedy's and M.L.King's death, the shooter was not Oswald or Ray. There was a professional sniper team, along with the support teams to cover up, to witness. At last, there would be a scapegoat to bear the responsibility. If the plot had gone through, the likely result would be that I was shot by a "stray bullet".
But the plot was interrupted by Castillo. He jumped on the bank robber. White had to shoot Castillo and touched off a real gun fighting with policemen earlier then planned. Castillo destroyed Feds' plot. That's why he was later tarnished by the media. It was a revenge from the Feds. I was astonished when I first read the detailed negative past about Castillo. Was the paper talk about a bank hero or a criminal? Then as most media(include Chinese newspaper) joined the choir of that negative propaganda which turned a good Samaritan into a bad guy, I realized it was a punishment from Feds. Another man punished was the police captain Stasko.
I don't know if Stasko also works for the FBI. But I'm sure his death is a punishment from the Feds. Because his squad killed an asset of the Feds and soured a plot. Though news two weeks later said he died in crash by legally drunk, I think it was a cover up story. I believe the first report was the right cause : he died because he fell asleep - an irresistible one. I had experience of that kind of murder attempt. See "12. Mind control EM sleep wave (1) .
A witness said, " Capt. Stasko's car began slowly swerving off the left hand side of the road and plowed into a tree, according to Ackerson." A slowly swerving used to be caused by a sudden asleep on the wheel not by drunk driving. The time was at 1:20 a.m. midnight. when there was few vehicle on highway. The witness was a Sonoma County sheriff's deputy. Was he the man who controls the switch of that EM sleep wave instrument and watch the whole process?
Back to new "bank robbery" murder attempt:
1. So in this "drug money" frame case, in case I going to a bank to withdraw money, Feds created a shooting death case on 5/23/08 to justify another coming "shoot death". See #599.
2. On 6/23. "(Milpitas) Serial bank robber strikes for 12th time", FBI said. Do you get familiar with it when you learned Buford White "also was a suspect in 10 other bank robberies."?
3. That serial robber held up the Commercial Bank on South Park Victoria Drive in Milpitas on Tuesday (One of my two bank accounts happened to be on that Drive too. Is that a coincidence?
Here are two bank branches I have account. One is Washington Mutual branch on South Park Victoria Drive in Milpitas. One is Wachovia branch on Berryessa Road in San Jose.
On 7/19, I wrote ". 559. Plan to murder in the name of "Bank robbery" (7/19/08)
Two days later, there was a news which I thought was the swift response of the Feds:
Quote, "Bank Gave Counterfeit Bills, Couple Says
Different Customer Given Refund After Fake Money Claim, Report Says
July 22, 2008
Ulises Garcia said he was withdrawing cash from a Wachovia Bank and depositing it into a Bank of America so he could pay his bills online. Bank Gave Counterfeit Bills, Couple Says - Orlando News Story - WKMG Orlando
The fake money happened to be from a Wachovia Bank, was that another coincidence? Or if I try to avoid "drug money" trap by withdrawing from bank, they prepared a "fake money" trap?
I also allege Feds may create a "terror bombing" in the name of Indian terrorist if I go to Wachovia branch. There is India store in same shopping center. I'll talk about it next. |
| | |