• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138:187]

Status
Not open for further replies.
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Buck naked said:
I enter this statement of yours as evidence to my point.
Click to expand...

What point?

You can't or won't define "proper and complete investigation" while ignoring the FBI who performed a "proper and complete investigation" ?

Buck naked said:
Since you already laid down your arms, try picking up a dictionary and using a pen.
Click to expand...

You keep making this accusation.

Why?

Since you have no clue as to what arms I possess.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
TRANSLATION: You will search for the most heavily redacted documents and ignore ones that actually discuss 9/11.
Click to expand...

Bad translation. Your debunker to English dictionary is broken.

He's pulling out all the fbi documents you talk about all the time.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

BmanMcfly said:
Bad translation. Your debunker to English dictionary is broken.

He's pulling out all the fbi documents you talk about all the time.
Click to expand...

There are 70+ documents. He posted the most redacted while ignoring those that have the most meat.

And you defend that dishonesty?
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
There are 70+ documents. He posted the most redacted while ignoring those that have the most meat.

And you defend that dishonesty?
Click to expand...

Lmao... Did you not even read the op before posting? He's putting them all up one after another.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

BmanMcfly said:
Lmao... Did you not even read the op before posting? He's putting them all up one after another.
Click to expand...

And he started with......................

Not the first, not the second......

You defend this dishonesty?
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
And he started with......................

Not the first, not the second......

You defend this dishonesty?
Click to expand...

There's no dishonesty. Except for yours here pretending like everyone else is dishonest.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
So you defend his dishonesty....

Got it.

CT protecting CT.
Click to expand...

There's no dishonesty except for the dishonesty you are creating, right now.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
No, I got it.

Your support and defend dishonesty.
Click to expand...

Your whole charge is of dishonesty, that he's using blank documents to build a case.

He has since posted multiple other documents, in the process of sourcing ALL OF THEM. So, the only dishonesty is you making these fake accusations of dishonesty... Now stop trolling this thread.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

BmanMcfly said:
Your whole charge is of dishonesty, that he's using blank documents to build a case.

He has since posted multiple other documents, in the process of sourcing ALL OF THEM. So, the only dishonesty is you making these fake accusations of dishonesty... Now stop trolling this thread.
Click to expand...

No, I understand.

CT gotta stand with CT.

Even when they are being dishonest.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
No, I understand.

CT gotta stand with CT.

Even when they are being dishonest.
Click to expand...

What exactly is being dishonest?

The only thing you've shown is what I've demonstrated is just your delusional conspiracy theory that this thread is dishonest.

Why don't you help him out and put up the rest instead of whining that now you won't be able to lie so easy with the documents available?
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
No, I understand.

CT gotta stand with CT.

Even when they are being dishonest.
Click to expand...

I honestly think it's the biggest draw to CT. A guaranteed hard-line, no matter what, good ol' boys club. I've seen CTers claim mass murderers were innocent and it was a government set up. Joining the club is like a get out of honest assessment card even after death or incarceration. It's a guaranteed chorus of innocence claims from the CT hordes no matter the crime.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

ecofarm said:
I honestly think it's the biggest draw to CT. A guaranteed hard-line, no matter what, good ol' boys club. I've seen CTers claim mass murderers were innocent and it was a government set up. Joining the club is like a get out of honest assessment card even after death.
Click to expand...

Eco farm - You missed the part where this thread is about the FBI documents relating to 911... Fled put that post up because he feels that, for whatever reason, putting up documents like this to show what could be garnered from them, is "dishonest".

You have to agree that putting up source documents is the opposite of dishonesty? Right?
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

ecofarm said:
I honestly think it's the biggest draw to CT. A guaranteed hard-line, no matter what, good ol' boys club. I've seen CTers claim mass murderers were innocent and it was a government set up. Joining the club is like a get out of honest assessment card even after death or incarceration. It's a guaranteed chorus of innocence claims from the CT hordes no matter the crime.
Click to expand...

Invokes 100X like.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

BmanMcfly said:
You have to agree that putting up source documents is the opposite of dishonesty? Right?
Click to expand...

I agree that becoming a CTer is, to some extent, a desire to wash one's reputation in cries of government conspiracy against the CTer.

But that's not what you were debating specifically, was it. I merely commented on another post.
 
Last edited:
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

BmanMcfly said:
Eco farm - You missed the part where this thread is about the FBI documents relating to 911... Fled put that post up because he feels that, for whatever reason, putting up documents like this to show what could be garnered from them, is "dishonest".

You have to agree that putting up source documents is the opposite of dishonesty? Right?
Click to expand...

Starts with the most redacted (since the investigation was still working) and ignored the first documents that went to the 9/11 Commission.....
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

ecofarm said:
I agree that becoming a CTer is, to some extent, a desire to wash one's reputation in cries of government conspiracy against the CTer.

But that's not what you were debating specifically, was it. I merely commented on another post.
Click to expand...

That's fine, but you chose the least relevant post through which to make a point that may have been valid elsewhere... But the result is probably the exactl opposite of your intention.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
Starts with the most redacted (since the investigation was still working) and ignored the first documents that went to the 9/11 Commission.....
Click to expand...

Your point is? In other words :
This is dishonest because : _______________ ?
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

BmanMcfly said:
Your point is? In other words :
This is dishonest because : _______________ ?
Click to expand...

This is dishonest since he starts with the most redacted (since the investigation was still working) rather than the documents that actually contain information.....

In fact he bypassed plenty of documents to get to that one.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
This is dishonest since he starts with the most redacted (since the investigation was still working) rather than the documents that actually contain information.....

In fact he bypassed plenty of documents to get to that one.
Click to expand...

Is a delay the same thing as a denial?
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Fledermaus said:
So, you support dishonesty.

I got it.

Say no more.
Click to expand...

No what I said, quit lying about me.
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

Buck naked said:
The FBI creates or obtains records as it carries out its responsibilities. These records are generally organized into case files which commonly include investigative files and personnel files. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the Privacy Act was exercised in order to receive these 72 documents.


This thread will go over each document individually and determine whether or not there is any value, evidence or proof.
Click to expand...

What's your point?
 
re: The 72 useless FBI documents to the 911 Commission[W:138]

imyoda said:
What's your point?
Click to expand...

I'll allow him to clarifiy his own point, but, the gist of it is to show what evidence the FBI actually has to make a case with ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom