• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Physical Inventory of Flight 77?[W:99]

Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Those are not answers and you know it. If you asked someone to support a claim and they told you to google it would you call that an answer? Of course not. This level of dishonesty is the core factor of those defending the OCT because without it they would not be able to post at all.

Furthermore, people who defend the OCT LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE to brag about their knowledge on the "science" so you can be sure when the best response they can give is to basically say search different orgs you know they do not have the first clue.
He directed you to the people who would know the information you seek...You just appear to be too lazy,or stubborn to follow through

Again,not his fault.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Rock-solid proof if ever there was any. The FBI and NTSB had been removing aircraft wreckage for 3 days before your buddy showed up - compiling and sorting it on the far side of the helo pad before transfer to a storage location - so your buddy shows, up, takes a quick look around, doesn't see anything that looks like what he expects aircraft wreckage to look like and decides there was no plane.

That's freakin' brilliant.

Would you mind giving us the link to your claim that:

"The FBI and NTSB had been removing aircraft wreckage for 3 days before your buddy showed up"
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

He directed you to the people who would know the information you seek...You just appear to be too lazy,or stubborn to follow through

Again,not his fault.

So the next time you ask someone to back up a claim they can respond with "search for it yourself through the proper organizations" and you will completely accept that?
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

What is the entire physical inventory of the 757 recovered from the Pentagon? We know the plane had two engines so where were they recovered from inside the Pentagon? We know the plane had ten landing wheels so how many were recovered?



Parts must be supported by credible links and not from sites dedicated towards any slant on 9/11.

One need not recover or inventory every part of roadkill in order to determine, with certainty, what it was. Are you suggesting that only some of that aircraft and its contents entered the building or were planted there?
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

I agree on the single wheel and single turbine engine parts. That's why my own pet theory is that some sort of flying object DID strike the building, but it sure was not a 757, as the parking lot video shows.

My bet is the old A-3 story, which was circulating the internet years ago.

Whatever it was, it was NOT an airliner with passengers.


That is all Ive ever seen (except for that one weird untorched airframe part a few hundred yards from the E ring) and it never seems to bother anyone who defends the OCT that they cannot produce any inventory.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

One need not recover or inventory every part of roadkill in order to determine, with certainty, what it was. Are you suggesting that only some of that aircraft and its contents entered the building or were planted there?

Is this your justification why nobody can provide an inventory of flight 77's parts? I bet right now without searching you cannot tell us which organization was responsible for the collection and reassembly of the parts.

Im also betting you dont care. Let's see if Im correct.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

One need not recover or inventory every part of roadkill in order to determine, with certainty, what it was. Are you suggesting that only some of that aircraft and its contents entered the building or were planted there?

Have you ever participated in or closely examined a traditional NTSB investigation?

By traditional, I mean an investigation OTHER THAN the "investigations" conducted into TWA800 or the several aircraft on 911.

Their attention to detail is excellent, when politics are not involved.

Their "reports" on the various 911 aircraft are very short indeed, as I recall just 6 or 8 pages. Compare that to a real NTSB investigation, and you see a legitimate one runs hundreds of pages of details.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Have you ever participated in or closely examined a traditional NTSB investigation?

By traditional, I mean an investigation OTHER THAN the "investigations" conducted into TWA800 or the several aircraft on 911.

Their attention to detail is excellent, when politics are not involved.

Their "reports" on the various 911 aircraft are very short indeed, as I recall just 6 or 8 pages. Compare that to a real NTSB investigation, and you see a legitimate one runs hundreds of pages of details.

Much like when I lose my keys, I stop looking once I find them. Did I try each key to see if it still worked? Nope. Did I count them to ensure that none was missing? Nope. Did I dust for fingerprint to be sure they were not handled, moved or hidden by someone else? Nope. Those pages of details are usually produced when there is some serious doubt as to what may have caused a crash.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

That is all Ive ever seen (except for that one weird untorched airframe part a few hundred yards from the E ring) and it never seems to bother anyone who defends the OCT that they cannot produce any inventory.

I gave you the answer.

You dont like the answer.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Those are not answers and you know it. If you asked someone to support a claim and they told you to google it would you call that an answer? Of course not. This level of dishonesty is the core factor of those defending the OCT because without it they would not be able to post at all.

Furthermore, people who defend the OCT LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE to brag about their knowledge on the "science" so you can be sure when the best response they can give is to basically say search different orgs you know they do not have the first clue.

No one told you to 'google it',you were given specific agencies to ask,and now all you want to do is whine.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Much like when I lose my keys, I stop looking once I find them. Did I try each key to see if it still worked? Nope. Did I count them to ensure that none was missing? Nope. Did I dust for fingerprint to be sure they were not handled, moved or hidden by someone else? Nope. Those pages of details are usually produced when there is some serious doubt as to what may have caused a crash.

Nice dodge, and a most dishonest response to my post to you. That is most out of character for yourself.

The NTSB reports regarding the 911 aircraft were MOST out of character for the NTSB. I've followed them for years. When politics rule, truth is covered up.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

No one told you to 'google it',you were given specific agencies to ask,and now all you want to do is whine.

The hypocrisy here is just freaking laughable. Go ahead and claim you would be okay with someone telling you to search an agency to back up THEIR claim.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

So the next time you ask someone to back up a claim they can respond with "search for it yourself through the proper organizations" and you will completely accept that?

So you're claiming the sources listed would NOT answer your demands?
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

The hypocrisy here is just freaking laughable. Go ahead and claim you would be okay with someone telling you to search an agency to back up THEIR claim.

You really need to learn what hypocrisy means...You're doing it wrong.

And no one told you to 'search' an agency,only ASK them.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

So you're claiming the sources listed would NOT answer your demands?

Good job ignoring this question:

"So the next time you ask someone to back up a claim they can respond with "search for it yourself through the proper organizations" and you will completely accept that?"

The longer you guys post and work hard to avoid admitting you do not have THE FIRST FREAKING CLUE on an inventory of 77 you only help prove you have taken an indefensible position.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

You really need to learn what hypocrisy means...You're doing it wrong.

And no one told you to 'search' an agency,only ASK them.

ROTFL!! The desperation is reaching new levels of hysteria because when you cannot be honest and admit you have no idea why you have no access to an inventory of 77 you are screaming you believe the OCT based on nothing but fear.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Good job ignoring this question:

"So the next time you ask someone to back up a claim they can respond with "search for it yourself through the proper organizations" and you will completely accept that?"

The longer you guys post and work hard to avoid admitting you do not have THE FIRST FREAKING CLUE on an inventory of 77 you only help prove you have taken an indefensible position.

Who inventories aircraft components in aircraft incidents?
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Would you mind giving us the link to your claim that:

"The FBI and NTSB had been removing aircraft wreckage for 3 days before your buddy showed up"

Ummmm,... well we could start with the bleeding obvious - the self-evident nature of law enforcement collecting evidence at a crime scene. It's what they do. What they hell else would they be doing for 3 days? :confused:

But we also have abundant photographic evidence of aircraft debris being identified, collected and then laid out at the heliport (and also in the A-E drive). Like this as just a starter:

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_Pentagon_Debris_171.jpg
https://vault.fbi.gov/9-11-attacks-...ials/Image/9-11-pentagon-debris-2/image_large
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_Pentagon_Debris_61.jpg
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

It is funny how even those who are the most ardent defenders of the OCT cannot answer such a simple question.

It is so funny how even those who troll cannot accept answers given to them

CT folks have stated , do your own research. Give it a try.
CT posters have stated no citations needed. Just following what they state.:lamo

When are you going to ask those who defend that Flight 77 did not hit the pentagon to provide a physical inventory of what did?

So provide a source of the inventory of what hit the Pentagon or blew it up? Then we can continue.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Who inventories aircraft components in aircraft incidents?

Depends on the circumstances.

That has nothing to do with the fact you have once again failed to provide an inventory list of 77.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Depends on the circumstances.

That has nothing to do with the fact you have once again failed to provide an inventory list of 77.

What circumstances?

You want an INVENTORY contact the people who INVENTORY aircraft incidents.

You question has been answered.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

Ummmm,... well we could start with the bleeding obvious - the self-evident nature of law enforcement collecting evidence at a crime scene. It's what they do. What they hell else would they be doing for 3 days? :confused:

But we also have abundant photographic evidence of aircraft debris being identified, collected and then laid out at the heliport (and also in the A-E drive). Like this as just a starter:

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_Pentagon_Debris_171.jpg
https://vault.fbi.gov/9-11-attacks-...ials/Image/9-11-pentagon-debris-2/image_large
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/db_images/db_Pentagon_Debris_61.jpg

Did you actually try to use the myths site as a source to back up your claim?

Okay. Two of the links failed and the third provides NOTHING to support your claim.

One more time.

Back up your claim:

"The FBI and NTSB had been removing aircraft wreckage for 3 days before your buddy showed up"
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

What circumstances?

You want an INVENTORY contact the people who INVENTORY aircraft incidents.

You question has been answered.

What circumstances? Thank you for proving you do not know even the most fundamental aspects. Once. Again. Good grief Ive never seen someone so useless at defending the OCT.

If my question had been answered we'd have a link to the inventoried parts from flight 77. You nor anyone else has been able to provide that inventory and rather than being a decent person and simply admitting you have never seen one it is more comfortable for you to pretend it doesnt matter.
 
Re: Physical Inventory of Flight 77?

What circumstances? Thank you for proving you do not know even the most fundamental aspects. Once. Again. Good grief Ive never seen someone so useless at defending the OCT.

If my question had been answered we'd have a link to the inventoried parts from flight 77. You nor anyone else has been able to provide that inventory and rather than being a decent person and simply admitting you have never seen one it is more comfortable for you to pretend it doesnt matter.

All that and you didn't even address what circumstances are needed for the.people who INVENTORY aircraft incidents not to inventory this incident.

NTSB/FAA

Contact them for the INVENTORY.
 
Back
Top Bottom