• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Evidence The Titanic Was Sunk on Purpose

S

Scott

Banned
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
934
Reaction score
80
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
I just came across this video.

Evidence The Titanic Was Sunk on Purpose
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_d_GEy8lr0


They do make a good case. I'm going to sit on the fence for now but if I had to stake my life on it, I'd bet the people who made the video are right.


Check out what is said about the portholes at the 10:00 time mark. Some good points are made at the 47:46 time mark too. Their info about the number on the propeller, the portholes, etc has to be verified I suppose. If it turns out to be true, it closes the case.
 
wasted my time watching the Jews were Nazis videos so wont bother wasting my time on this nonsense, but if I had to stake my life on it there would be no hesitation, the people who made the video are full of c**p.
 
Scott said:
I just came across this video.

Evidence The Titanic Was Sunk on Purpose
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_d_GEy8lr0


They do make a good case. I'm going to sit on the fence for now but if I had to stake my life on it, I'd bet the people who made the video are right.


Check out what is said about the portholes at the 10:00 time mark. Some good points are made at the 47:46 time mark too. Their info about the number on the propeller, the portholes, etc has to be verified I suppose. If it turns out to be true, it closes the case.
Click to expand...

Wow. There really is no bit of nonsense you won't fall for is there.
 
Scott said:
I just came across this video.

Evidence The Titanic Was Sunk on Purpose
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_d_GEy8lr0


They do make a good case. I'm going to sit on the fence for now but if I had to stake my life on it, I'd bet the people who made the video are right.


Check out what is said about the portholes at the 10:00 time mark. Some good points are made at the 47:46 time mark too. Their info about the number on the propeller, the portholes, etc has to be verified I suppose. If it turns out to be true, it closes the case.
Click to expand...

If they were trying to sink the ship on purpose, you'd think that they'd invest in more lifeboats, and opt for a method a bit less random than a mid-Atlantic collision with an iceberg.

A boiler explosion, for example, would make a lot more sense.
 
Gathomas88 said:
If they were trying to sink the ship on purpose, you'd think that they'd invest in more lifeboats, and opt for a method a bit less random than a mid-Atlantic collision with an iceberg.

A boiler explosion, for example, would make a lot more sense.
Click to expand...

They did have that in mind with the whole boiler thing in the idea of the fire with coal thing apparently in number ten... Why was he so defensive about his testimony? After, reading the guy he brought up testimony makes me wonder, why he seemed so defensive about his recounting of the events that led up to hitting the iceberg. They also wanted to save money due to the bussiness going down thus didn't invest in that many life boats. In fact, I beleive their is evidence of Life boats being tested for seventy men but they where loading said lifeboats with twelve people at a time during the sinking.....
 
Last edited:
Gathomas88 said:
If they were trying to sink the ship on purpose, you'd think that they'd invest in more lifeboats, and opt for a method a bit less random than a mid-Atlantic collision with an iceberg.

A boiler explosion, for example, would make a lot more sense.
Click to expand...

The Jews put that iceberg there. If it was a boiler explosion they could have traced the money and realized that the Jews owned the company responsible (just like they own and control everything else). They never thought anyone would believe that they could manoeuver an iceberg into the Titanic.
 
Quag said:
The Jews put that iceberg there. If it was a boiler explosion they could have traced the money and realized that the Jews owned the company responsible (just like they own and control everything else). They never thought anyone would believe that they could manoeuver an iceberg into the Titanic.
Click to expand...

Not what I was saying, but their is evidence that they did switch the Oylmpic and titianic, if said evidence is truthful.
 
A joke is a joke but this is too much. Stop watching YooToob
 
Ryriena said:
Not what I was saying, but their is evidence that they did switch the Oylmpic and titianic, if said evidence is truthful.
Click to expand...

A youtube video by a nutjob conspiracy theorist is NOT evidence.
 
I looked at old photos and such things from testimony at the inquiry.

hqdefault.jpg

image.jpg
 
Last edited:
Titanicberg - Titanic Myths and Rumors

- "My favourite rumor is that the ship was sunk on purpose and whatsmore it was the Olympia (Titanic's sister ship) and not the Titanic. All part of an elaborate insurance scam. The two ships were switched when they were dry-docked together. Reason; because the Olympia had received serious damage after a collison in 1911 and the White Star Line wanted to right it off and claim the insurance. Another nice try but rumor is False. Both ships were under insured relative to their value and besides prior to the scrapping of the Olympia the damage was still evident on its hull."


The Secret of How the Titanic Sank - US News
 
Quag said:
So two sister ships looking similar is your evidence?
Seriously?
I mean seriously?
In all seriously is that your evidence?
Click to expand...
And they weren't exactly sister ships you could tell them apart if you knew how to look at the differences between the two ships.
TIP | United States Senate Inquiry | Day 4 | Testimony of Frederick Fleet (Lookout, SS Titanic)
I found the persons he mentioned in the watch tower testimony and he did seem defensive in some aspects. Like the below photo

image.jpg
 
mike2810 said:
Titanicberg - Titanic Myths and Rumors

- "My favourite rumor is that the ship was sunk on purpose and whatsmore it was the Olympia (Titanic's sister ship) and not the Titanic. All part of an elaborate insurance scam. The two ships were switched when they were dry-docked together. Reason; because the Olympia had received serious damage after a collison in 1911 and the White Star Line wanted to right it off and claim the insurance. Another nice try but rumor is False. Both ships were under insured relative to their value and besides prior to the scrapping of the Olympia the damage was still evident on its hull."


The Secret of How the Titanic Sank - US News
Click to expand...

And you actually beleive a news station in the U.S to tell the truth?
 
Ryriena said:
And they weren't exactly sister ships you could tell them apart if you knew how to look at the differences between the two ships.
TIP | United States Senate Inquiry | Day 4 | Testimony of Frederick Fleet (Lookout, SS Titanic)
I found the persons he mentioned in the watch tower testimony and he did seem defensive in some aspects. Like the below photo

View attachment 67187864
Click to expand...

So two sister ships looking similar is your evidence?
Seriously?
I mean seriously?
In all seriously is that your evidence?
 
Is it physical or just psychological mental damage that Cters suffer from?
 
conspiracy_04.jpg

These above images are used by conspiracy theorists alleging a difference in the windows on B-deck -which should not be surprising as two private verandahs and suites were added to this section of the ship after it's launch.
This claim is often mentioned alongside the above claim about the apparent discrepancy in the number of portholes on Titanic's port side bow. And the answer is the same. Titanic was a work in progress, designed to be a better, improved version of her older sister Olympic. The difference in windows on B-deck between the time of her launch and her maiden voyage is explained by one of the key differences between the two ships: instead of a promenade as on Olympic's B deck, two private verandahs and suites were added to Titanic, hence necessitating a change in the B deck window configurations.

The Olympic Switch Theory: Did the Titanic Really Sink? | William Murdoch
 
A little research would save a heap of embarrassment.
 
I am 27 years old and don't always beleive what I read either. Did you not look at the differnces in the ships?
 
the last pic they say is the titanic looks more like the Olympic.
Hmm could it be that an CT site was less than honest???
Olympic:
Olympic_in_New_York_cropped.jpg
Titanic:
Titanic-Cobh-Harbour-1912.jpg
 
Ryriena said:
I am 27 years old and don't always beleive what I read either. Did you not look at the differnces in the ships?
Click to expand...

Did you not bother trying to see if the site you used was honest?
Took me 2 mins to see that it was full of crap!
Sorry this whole CT BS is just utter nonsense.
 
Ryriena said:
I am 27 years old and don't always beleive what I read either. Did you not look at the differnces in the ships?
Click to expand...

See post number 18. Do you really think that the alleged conspirators would be stupid enough to send out a ship with different portholes? Be serious please.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom