• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Proven.

KokomoJojo

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 17, 2014
Messages
7,544
Reaction score
1,503
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Proven.

Not only is this fraud and RICO but rises to the level of treason against the american people by government and its agencies.

Cold Fusion and Beyond - Dr. Eugene Mallove




The fraud continues at all levels, even from certain posters on various internet forums.


Dr. Eugene F. Mallove - MURDERED








Eugene Mallove

crap cant edit the title
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

Cold Fusion; Infinite Power
- Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Proven.

Not only is this fraud and RICO but rises to the level of treason against the american people by government and its agencies.

Cold Fusion and Beyond - Dr. Eugene Mallove




The fraud continues at all levels, even from certain posters on various internet forums.


Dr. Eugene F. Mallove - MURDERED








Eugene Mallove

crap cant edit the title



How can you get infinite power from something that doesn't exist? :roll:
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

How can you get infinite power from something that doesn't exist? :roll:

something that doesnt exist or something not yet commercially available because the patent office refuses to issue patents?:roll:
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

something that doesnt exist or something not yet commercially available because
the patent office refuses to issue patents?
:roll:



How can you patent something that doesn't exist? :roll:
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

How can you patent something that doesn't exist? :roll:

huh? Are you serious?

they do it all the time! LOL

You cant patent what does exist when it comes to cold fusion.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

huh? Are you serious?

They do it all the time! Lol

you cant patent what does exist when it comes to cold fusion.



cold fusion as an energy source doesn't exist.

If you have evidence otherwise let's see it. :roll:
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

[/color][/b]

Ok so you intend to prove that there is no fraud by attempting to prove a strawman argument? How do you think the nonexistence of a commercially available device has anything to do with disproving the claims made?

Proving the nonexistence of a commercial device and the lack of any patents supports the claims made. You dont see that?

Have you bothered to actually watch the testimonial video interviews on record and posted above?

Dr. Eugene Mallove was the President of the nonprofit New Energy Foundation, Inc. and held the position of Editor-in-Chief of Infinite Energy Magazine since 1995. Dr. Mallove held a Master of Science Degree and Bachelor of Science Degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from MIT and a Science Doctorate in Environmental Health Sciences from Harvard University. Dr. Mallove had broad experience in high technology engineering companies including Hughes Research Laboratories, TASC (The Analytic Science Corporation), and MIT Lincoln Laboratory.


Since 1991 he worked as a consultant to U.S. corporations and investment firms doing and planning R & D in new energy. He taught science journalism at MIT and at Boston University, and he was Chief Science Writer at the MIT News Office when cold fusion erupted. Prior to that, he was a top science writer and broadcaster with the Voice of America in Washington, DC. He was also the author of three science books and wrote several science and technology articles for magazines and newspapers.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

Ok so you intend to prove
that there is no fraud by attempting to prove a strawman argument? How do you think the nonexistence of a commercially available device has anything to do with disproving the claims made?

Proving the nonexistence of a commercial device and the lack of any patents supports the claims made. You dont see that?

Have you bothered to actually watch the testimonial video interviews on record and posted above?

Dr. Eugene Mallove was the President of the nonprofit New Energy Foundation, Inc. and held the position of Editor-in-Chief of Infinite Energy Magazine since 1995. Dr. Mallove held a Master of Science Degree and Bachelor of Science Degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from MIT and a Science Doctorate in Environmental Health Sciences from Harvard University. Dr. Mallove had broad experience in high technology engineering companies including Hughes Research Laboratories, TASC (The Analytic Science Corporation), and MIT Lincoln Laboratory.


Since 1991 he worked as a consultant to U.S. corporations and investment firms doing and planning R & D in new energy. He taught science journalism at MIT and at Boston University, and he was Chief Science Writer at the MIT News Office when cold fusion erupted. Prior to that, he was a top science writer and broadcaster with the Voice of America in Washington, DC. He was also the author of three science books and wrote several science and technology articles for magazines and newspapers.



I don't have time to waste proving that BS is BS.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

I don't have time to waste proving that BS is BS.

but you are trying to prove something (not sure what) by using strawman arguments and I agree that approach is a waste of time.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

but you are trying to prove something
(not sure what) by using strawman arguments and I agree that approach is a waste of time.



No, I'm not trying to prove anything. I'm just saying that cold fusion isn't being used as a source of power on this planet. :roll:
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

No, I'm not trying to prove anything. I'm just saying that cold fusion isn't being used as a source of power on this planet. :roll:
Or they don't call it that!:mrgreen:
I recall in the early days, usenet had a category called sci.physics.fusion.
For several years this was discussed.
There was a company out of Rome, Georgia that made a pump that heated water
at over unity. The maker never claimed any form of cold fusion,
just a very efficient way to heat water to steam.
But apparently a lot of industrial customers liked what his pumps did
for their electric bills.
And Blacklight power seems to be doing something, although that something appears
to be more about raising money, they have some impressive demonstrations.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

How can you patent something that doesn't exist? :roll:

But it does exist.

The only thing that stops it from being patented is the moronic intransigence of a federal bureaucrat.

I think the guy was really persuasive and came across as being totally knowledgeable.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

OMG. This is a pathetic attempt to try and prove that cold fusion exists so he can push his garbage about the WTC being taken down with nukes.

It doesn't get any more screwed up in 9/11 truth land than this.

Those who follow 9/11 truth take note, it is stupidity such as this that ensures you are treated with contempt.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

Of course it works, the working model was in that car that runs on water that Elvis drove after he faked his death.

But THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT IT!!11!! <scary music>
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

R u guys tripping?
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

R u guys tripping?

No, why do you think the following is strange?

"OMG. This is a pathetic attempt to try and prove that cold fusion exists so he can push his garbage about the WTC being taken down with nukes.

It doesn't get any more screwed up in 9/11 truth land than this.

Those who follow 9/11 truth take note, it is stupidity such as this that ensures you are treated with contempt."


Note: Cold Fusion doesn't exist and is not falsifiable in the laboratory, and it is merely the product of science fiction. Those who believe the WTC was destroyed with cold fusion nukes are tripping.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

No, why do you think the following is strange?

"OMG. This is a pathetic attempt to try and prove that cold fusion exists so he can push his garbage about the WTC being taken down with nukes.

It doesn't get any more screwed up in 9/11 truth land than this.

Those who follow 9/11 truth take note, it is stupidity such as this that ensures you are treated with contempt."


Note: Cold Fusion doesn't exist and is not falsifiable in the laboratory, and it is merely the product of science fiction. Those who believe the WTC was destroyed with cold fusion nukes are tripping.

Methinks that for the purposes of this thread we have a two man troll tag team. I don't think that either of them really believe that cold fusion exists.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

Methinks that for the purposes of this thread we have a two man troll tag team. I don't think that either of them really believe that cold fusion exists.

I agree, they would have to possess the IQ of a gnat not to realise cold fusion only exists in the imagination.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

I agree, they would have to possess the IQ of a gnat not to realise cold fusion only exists in the imagination.

I agree. This is a hilariously wacko site but there is one glimpse of sanity.

Cold Fusion and The Future

"Nuclear Weapons
Most experts say it is unlikely that a cold fusion powered nuclear bomb can be built.
Let us hope they are right. Cold fusion devices are cheap. If a cold fusion bomb is possible,
someone might be able to mass produce thousands of devices the size of shoe boxes, each
with the power of the Hiroshima bomb, costing a thousand dollars apiece. They would be undetectable. They
might become as common as Stinger Missiles, which are reportedly available in the third world weapons bazaars.

It is cold comfort, but terrorists have never used a Stinger Missile against defenseless civilian aircraft. They have, however, put a powerful bomb in the World Trade Center. If they had acquired a small thermonuclear fusion bomb from the arsenal of the former Soviet Union, the result would have been unthinkable.
Cold fusion appears to be limited to slow, relatively low power reactions, which require an intact metal lattice. Cold fusion is not a chain reaction, like fission. When one hydrogen atom undergoes a cold fusion reaction, it does not directly trigger another atom. It will raise the temperature unless you remove the heat, which can spur the reaction. There are some indications that if you let a cell overheat, the reaction can quickly increase to high levels until the metal melts. This would destroy the lattice and instantly quench the reaction. It does not seem to be a practical way to make a bomb."
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

I agree. This is a hilariously wacko site but there is one glimpse of sanity.

Cold Fusion and The Future

"



seems your boy is on my side not yours so whats up with that?

It also seems that not only does your post demonstrate complete lack of knowledge by failing to distinguish between a neutron generator, heater, or a thermo nuclear bomb.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

Methinks that for the purposes of this thread we have a two man troll tag team. I don't think that either of them really believe that cold fusion exists.

Sorry to inform you but I am neither in denial nor do I support or defend the fraud or murdering people to keep it quiet.
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

"Cold fusion is a hypothetical type of nuclear reaction that would occur at, or near, room temperature, compared with temperatures in the millions of degrees that are required for "hot" fusion, which takes place naturally within stars. There is currently no accepted theoretical model which would allow cold fusion to occur.

In 1989 Martin Fleischmann (then one of the world's leading electrochemists) and Stanley Pons reported that their apparatus had produced anomalous heat ("excess heat"), of a magnitude they asserted would defy explanation except in terms of nuclear processes. They further reported measuring small amounts of nuclear reaction byproducts, including neutrons and tritium. The small tabletop experiment involved electrolysis of heavy water on the surface of a palladium (Pd) electrode. The reported results received wide media attention, and raised hopes of a cheap and abundant source of energy.

Many scientists tried to replicate the experiment with the few details available. Hopes fell with the large number of negative replications, the withdrawal of many positive replications, the discovery of flaws and sources of experimental error in the original experiment, and finally the discovery that Fleischmann and Pons had not actually detected nuclear reaction byproducts. By late 1989, most scientists considered cold fusion claims dead, and cold fusion subsequently gained a reputation as pathological science. In 1989, a review panel organized by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) found that the evidence for the discovery of a new nuclear process was not persuasive enough to start a special program, but was "sympathetic toward modest support" for experiments "within the present funding system." A second DOE review, convened in 2004 to look at new research, reached conclusions similar to the first. Support within the then-present funding system did not occur."

Cold fusion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"Nuclear fusion and nuclear fission are two different types of energy-releasing reactions in which energy is released from high-powered atomic bonds between the particles within the nucleus. The main difference between these two processes is that fission is the splitting of an atom into two or more smaller ones while fusion is the fusing of two or more smaller atoms into a larger one."

Nuclear Fission vs Nuclear Fusion - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

So, how does a theoretical cold fusion device create fission?
 
Re: Cold Fusion; Infinite Power - Academic/MIT Collusion Wit Government/DOE Fraud Pro

"Cold fusion is a hypothetical type of nuclear reaction that would occur at, or near, room temperature, compared with temperatures in the millions of degrees that are required for "hot" fusion, which takes place naturally within stars. There is currently no accepted theoretical model which would allow cold fusion to occur.

In 1989 Martin Fleischmann (then one of the world's leading electrochemists) and Stanley Pons reported that their apparatus had produced anomalous heat ("excess heat"), of a magnitude they asserted would defy explanation except in terms of nuclear processes. They further reported measuring small amounts of nuclear reaction byproducts, including neutrons and tritium. The small tabletop experiment involved electrolysis of heavy water on the surface of a palladium (Pd) electrode. The reported results received wide media attention, and raised hopes of a cheap and abundant source of energy.

Many scientists tried to replicate the experiment with the few details available. Hopes fell with the large number of negative replications, the withdrawal of many positive replications, the discovery of flaws and sources of experimental error in the original experiment, and finally the discovery that Fleischmann and Pons had not actually detected nuclear reaction byproducts. By late 1989, most scientists considered cold fusion claims dead, and cold fusion subsequently gained a reputation as pathological science. In 1989, a review panel organized by the United States Department of Energy (DOE) found that the evidence for the discovery of a new nuclear process was not persuasive enough to start a special program, but was "sympathetic toward modest support" for experiments "within the present funding system." A second DOE review, convened in 2004 to look at new research, reached conclusions similar to the first. Support within the then-present funding system did not occur."

Cold fusion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"Nuclear fusion and nuclear fission are two different types of energy-releasing reactions in which energy is released from high-powered atomic bonds between the particles within the nucleus. The main difference between these two processes is that fission is the splitting of an atom into two or more smaller ones while fusion is the fusing of two or more smaller atoms into a larger one."

Nuclear Fission vs Nuclear Fusion - Difference and Comparison | Diffen

So, how does a theoretical cold fusion device create fission?

THAT is nonsense! OMG :roll:

wiki?

Did Jeb leave you down?

I am surprised that you would post such outdated material that in fact is parroting the fraud.

Then again on second thought no I am not.

I already posted the results in another thread.



to the tune of 26xPin.
 
Back
Top Bottom