• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kennedy[W:480]

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
535
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible. And why hasn't the guy been arrested, and the guy riding shotgun as well?
 
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible.

Maybe because Mrs. Kennedy or Gov. Connally never reported hearing or seeing a gun shot come from the driver?
 
Moderator's Warning:
Moved to Conspiracy Theory.
 
Maybe because Mrs. Kennedy or Gov. Connally never reported hearing or seeing a gun shot come from the driver?

The video is one of the few pieces of evidence that existed. They would have studied it backwards and forward and upside down. There is no way they could have missed it. 5 minutes after I posted this, it was moved to "conspiracy theories", so I went back and watched it 3 more times to make sure I'm not losing it, and the driver actually shoots him. Go watch it yourself and then tell me you don't see it. Right at the crucial moment, the film gets jumpy for a split second, indicating that some frames were removed. They couldn't remove too many frames because there would be too much of a jump. They removed just enough frames to cast doubt.
 
Last edited:
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible. And why hasn't the guy been arrested, and the guy riding shotgun as well?

Because it didn't happen....
 
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible. And why hasn't the guy been arrested, and the guy riding shotgun as well?

1. We have a current, active thread on this subject already.
2. No, you can not see the driver turn around and shoot the President. That's just stupid.
 
The video is one of the few pieces of evidence that existed. They would have studied it backwards and forward and upside down. There is no way they could have missed it. 5 minutes after I posted this, it was moved to "conspiracy theories", so I went back and watched it 3 more times to make sure I'm not losing it, and the driver actually shoots him. Go watch it yourself and then tell me you don't see it. Right at the crucial moment, the film gets jumpy for a split second, indicating that some frames were removed. They couldn't remove too many frames because there would be too much of a jump. They removed just enough frames to cast doubt.

Mrs. Kennedy and Gov. Connally were in the car at the moment of the assasination. Most people would have accepted their verson if the driver shot the President.

You can watch the video a million times if you like, that does not change the fact that no one reported the driver turned back an shot the President.

Either Mrs. Kennedy and Gov. Connally were in on the assignation or you are mistaken. Which is most plausible?
 
The video is one of the few pieces of evidence that existed. They would have studied it backwards and forward and upside down. There is no way they could have missed it. 5 minutes after I posted this, it was moved to "conspiracy theories", so I went back and watched it 3 more times to make sure I'm not losing it, and the driver actually shoots him. Go watch it yourself and then tell me you don't see it. Right at the crucial moment, the film gets jumpy for a split second, indicating that some frames were removed. They couldn't remove too many frames because there would be too much of a jump. They removed just enough frames to cast doubt.

Which video? The zapruder film? There were witnesses that saw shooters by the knoll however everyone that saw kennedy no one reported the driver shooting him
 
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible. And why hasn't the guy been arrested, and the guy riding shotgun as well?

Well, Kennedy already got part of his head blown off by the first shot. So if the driver pumped him full of a few rounds, it didn't matter. I'm sure they just let it slide because he was already fatally shot. The driver probably had some gripe with him, and took the opportunity to release a little anger. It happens more than you would think. I guess.
 
It can now be revealed. I shot him. LBJ hired me. I was disguised as a car seat.
 
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible. And why hasn't the guy been arrested, and the guy riding shotgun as well?

Start reading here: http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...er-shot-jfk-november-22-1963-case-closed.html

The fatal shot was resolved over four years ago.
 
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible. And why hasn't the guy been arrested, and the guy riding shotgun as well?

I think you need to give it another look.

I also suggest you try another film, called JFK, The Smoking Gun. It offers a whole new theory, a very plausible one in fact that would answer all the question from the "miracle bullet" to how many shots there were
 
I think you need to give it another look.

I also suggest you try another film, called JFK, The Smoking Gun. It offers a whole new theory, a very plausible one in fact that would answer all the question from the "miracle bullet" to how many shots there were

If you're interested in all of this, you should read Judyth Bakers book "Me and Lee" about how she knew lee oswald before the assassination. What's even more interesting is that during the Jim Garrison investigation, i believe it was russo, who spoke about the testing of rats for cancer cures. 40 years before Judyth Baker said she was working on a CIA plot to use cancer to attempt to assassinate Castro with Oswald and Dave Ferries. It's really interesting, and she has tax returns to prove she worked the same time with Oswald in new Orleans.
 
Mrs. Kennedy and Gov. Connally were in the car at the moment of the assasination. Most people would have accepted their verson if the driver shot the President.

You can watch the video a million times if you like, that does not change the fact that no one reported the driver turned back an shot the President.

Either Mrs. Kennedy and Gov. Connally were in on the assignation or you are mistaken. Which is most plausible?

That would be the initial thought - to believe what Mrs. Kennedy and Gov. Connally said, but then again, if I was either of them, I wouldn't say sht. I don't think you would either - you'd be scared shtless (for obvious reasons).
 
That would be the initial thought - to believe what Mrs. Kennedy and Gov. Connally said, but then again, if I was either of them, I wouldn't say sht. I don't think you would either - you'd be scared shtless (for obvious reasons).

Is that the best you can do? An assumption?
 
It can now be revealed. I shot him. LBJ hired me. I was disguised as a car seat.

I was the second gunman on the grassy knoll. My brother was the grassy knoll, so in a way, he was my accomplice.
 
Is that the best you can do? An assumption?

The video shows it, so there's no way they could have missed it. We know they didn't say anything, so the only question is why didn't they say anything? There are only 2 possible reasons - either they were in on it or they were scared shtless. So yeah, it's a fair assumption.
 
Its on page 1 of this forum
 
Back
Top Bottom