katsung47
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2011
- Messages
- 879
- Reaction score
- 128
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The father being so cheerful right before he's going to give his speech definitely looks suspicious. I fully admit that it's hard to filter out what's real and what's fake in all of this, including some of the conspiracy theories. That being said, what saddens me most is how few people seem to be interested in seriously investigating all the various claims.
Perhaps because the claims are loony?
Some claims are unsubstantiated, yes. The question is, which ones?
Some claims are unsubstantiated, yes. The question is, which ones?
Most likely the ones you tend to believe. :mrgreen:
Why don't you tell us which ones are unsubstantiated?
Well for starters the claim that the school shooting was fake. Hopefully you guys have the decency to not involve the families of the deceased.
The father being so cheerful right before he's going to give his speech definitely looks suspicious. I fully admit that it's hard to filter out what's real and what's fake in all of this, including some of the conspiracy theories. That being said, what saddens me most is how few people seem to be interested in seriously investigating all the various claims.
And if this material the OP puts up is true and accurate, well.....:roll:
and "if" is true? and "if" the material the OP put up is not true and accurate , then we have what in your view HD?
"if" based explanations are used when someone does not have much of any truth to go on. It is speculation, and bad at that.
You won't fully understand this Mike, but I am very much NEUTRAL on this matter. And like you, I would prefer to believe the official story.
The trouble is that the official story springs another hole in it almost every day.
IF this is true and accurate what the lady says about her daughter's picture, THEN it is another hole in the official story. And a pretty big one, too.
I will make my mind up when I see fit, and I don't know when that will be. In the meantime, I'm considering all the evidence.
That is fine. Yet your statements seem to be critical to the official statements. When is the last time you questioned what the OP posted? Until the OP can provide other creditable backing of the statement. It remains highly suspect.
Having discussed this topic last night with some friends while watching the NFL playoffs, what I'm seeing is the same sort of cognitive dissonance related to the events of 11 September, except this time because the events are so recent, it's a bit different.
Still, myself included, nobody really WANTS to discuss facts or evidence that suggest staged events.
And if this material the OP puts up is true and accurate, well.....:roll:
I am suspicious of the government statements Mike, because they are beginning to show contradictions. It's just that simple.
Contradicting information suggests story telling is going on.
I dont see how any one could or would stage something like this...they have to know the truth has to come out.
I dont want to believe someone would use this tragedy to promote a political agenda...but unfortunately I know theres those that would.
As long as only a few people figure out the truth, I don't think they really care. I compare the event to 9/11. Some people have figured out it was an inside job, but many people haven't, and things seem to be going just fine for the war hawks.
Hmm, a nice, juicy, yet plausible explanation in one hand... and a big ol' stinky pile of drippy conspirorhea in the other. Why do the same people always love the taste of **** so much?Of course, a plausible explanation is that a reporter mistook another teacher for the principal.
As we're no longer talking about Lily Gaubert, I've responded here:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...dy-hook-killings-w-24-a-9.html#post1061347446
As with Mike, we're now talking about Sandy Hook as a whole, so I've responded here:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...ngs-w-24-a-post1061347474.html#post1061347474