• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Woman Claims Her Daughter's Photo was used for a Sandy Hook Shooting Victim

Passengers.

And some folks who are into photography and such, not me, mostly over at Let's Roll Forum, have apparently discovered other cases of pictures presented--pictures from earlier in the life of some of the pax or crew--somehow are found out to be pictures of other people, purloined from the internet.

As they create these biographies to match their list of casualties, it seems they take pictures from other places, and that becomes "Joe Blow" or somebody else.
 
Passengers.

Ah, you mean the passengers from the allegedly hijacked 9/11 planes.

And some folks who are into photography and such, not me, mostly over at Let's Roll Forum, have apparently discovered other cases of pictures presented--pictures from earlier in the life of some of the pax or crew--somehow are found out to be pictures of other people, purloined from the internet.

As they create these biographies to match their list of casualties, it seems they take pictures from other places, and that becomes "Joe Blow" or somebody else.

Yep, I've taken a look at some of it. And ofcourse there are the hijackers themselves:
At Least 7 of the 9/11 Hijackers are Still Alive
 
The father being so cheerful right before he's going to give his speech definitely looks suspicious. I fully admit that it's hard to filter out what's real and what's fake in all of this, including some of the conspiracy theories. That being said, what saddens me most is how few people seem to be interested in seriously investigating all the various claims.

Some people laugh to hide their pain. It's instilled in human and primates DNA to show their teeth when nervous, scared, frightened or under attack. So where is it written that everyone must cry their eyes out to show their pain?



Here's Emily Parker's obitutary.....

Emily Parker Obituary: View Emily Parker's Obituary by News Times

Emilie Parker laid to rest; family, governor call her an inspiration to all | Deseret News

Emilie Parker funeral set for Saturday in Ogden


The little girl is dead and there's no faking that. Leave her family alone.


Not showing the appropiate grief for the media and public approval helped to send this innocent woman to prison for life without parole. She was exonerated thirty years later ....

The Chamberlain trial was the most publicised in Australian history.[8] Given that most of the evidence presented in the case against Lindy Chamberlain was later rejected, the case is now used as an example of how media and bias can adversely affect a trial.

Public and media opinion during the trial was polarised, with "fanciful rumours and sickening jokes" and many cartoons. In particular, antagonism was directed towards Lindy Chamberlain for reportedly not behaving as a "stereotypical" grieving mother. Much was made of the Chamberlains' Seventh-day Adventist religion, including false allegations that the church was actually a cult that killed infants as part of bizarre religious ceremonies, that the family took a newborn baby to a remote desert location, and that Lindy Chamberlain showed little emotion during the proceedings.One anonymous tip was received from a man, falsely claiming to be Azaria's doctor in Mount Isa, that the name "Azaria" meant "sacrifice in the wilderness" (it actually means "God helped")[24] Others claimed that Lindy Chamberlain was a witch.[25]

The press appeared to seize upon any point that could be sensationalised. For example, it was reported that Lindy Chamberlain dressed her baby in a black dress. This provoked negative opinion, despite the trends of the early 1980s, during which black and navy cotton girls' dresses were in fashion, often trimmed with brightly coloured ribbon, or printed with brightly coloured sprigs of flowers.[26][27]

Death of Azaria Chamberlain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Australian Coroner Agrees Dingo Took Baby in 1980 Case - ABC News

The public disapproval of an Australian mother not showing the correct amount of stereo typical grief on camera is what I remembered most about that case, and I find some people's sick fixation and accusations against Emily's father strikenly similar.
 
Last edited:
Some people laugh to hide their pain.

Fine. The thing here is it seemed that he was "getting into" his pain before he made his speech. This is different from being leaden throughout.

The little girl is dead and there's no faking that. Leave her family alone.

I think you're a little naive to believe whatever the mainstream media says. This is the same mainstream media that went on about "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq and has changed its story so much in the Sandy Hook event. As to family, do you have no respect for the family of Lily Gaubert, whose picture was the Daily Mail initially claimed was that of Alyson Wyatt? Why has the Daily Mail not made an apology to Lily and her family, along with an explanation of why they put her picture up and claimed it was Alyson Wyatt?

Not showing the appropiate grief for the media and public approval helped to send this innocent woman to prison for life without parole. She was exonerated thirty years later ....

I can certainly agree that innocent people are at times jailed. I just hope you recognize that guilty people frequently walk free.
 
Fine. The thing here is it seemed that he was "getting into" his pain before he made his speech. This is different from being leaden throughout.
I tend to laugh when I'm nervous, too. A lot of people do.

I think you're a little naive to believe whatever the mainstream media says. This is the same mainstream media that went on about "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq and has changed its story so much in the Sandy Hook event. As to family, do you have no respect for the family of Lily Gaubert, whose picture was the Daily Mail initially claimed was that of Alyson Wyatt? Why has the Daily Mail not made an apology to Lily and her family, along with an explanation of why they put her picture up and claimed it was Alyson Wyatt?
A lot of people didn't beleive or buy that Iraq had WMDs...myself included. But we were shouted down as unpatriotic and terrorist sympathizers by the same people who are now claiming they were deceived by the media.

There was tons of misinformation about Sandy Hook by the media but after awhile you start to realize the only source worth a damn is the sheriff's office and the coroner.



I can certainly agree that innocent people are at times jailed. I just hope you recognize that guilty people frequently walk free.
And I hope you realize that persecuting innocent people through the media and the internet is wrong no matter how you splice it. That was Emily's father and just because he didn't show his grief on camera to some peoples satisfaction is no reason to persecute the man. Leave him alone.
 
Remarkable resemblance of Sandy Hook victims and professional crisis actors
Posted on January 11, 2013 by Dr. Eowyn

crisis-actors1.jpg


There’s a woman named Jennifer Greenberg Sexton who lives in Florida. She has a remarkable family because so many members of the Sexton-Greenberg clan are dopplegangers of people associated with the Sandy Hook massacre.

Here’s Jennifer Greenberg on Stars Color, a website with pictures of people in the movie industry — actors, actresses, directors — which suggests Greenberg is an actress, albeit not a famous or even known one:
 
Remarkable resemblance of Sandy Hook victims and professional crisis actors
Posted on January 11, 2013 by Dr. Eowyn

crisis-actors1.jpg


There’s a woman named Jennifer Greenberg Sexton who lives in Florida. She has a remarkable family because so many members of the Sexton-Greenberg clan are dopplegangers of people associated with the Sandy Hook massacre.

Here’s Jennifer Greenberg on Stars Color, a website with pictures of people in the movie industry — actors, actresses, directors — which suggests Greenberg is an actress, albeit not a famous or even known one:

I have heard this before; it's certainly an interesting possibility. But would like to point out that you didn't actually include any links in your post.
 
Remarkable resemblance of Sandy Hook victims and professional crisis actors
Posted on January 11, 2013 by Dr. Eowyn

crisis-actors1.jpg


There’s a woman named Jennifer Greenberg Sexton who lives in Florida. She has a remarkable family because so many members of the Sexton-Greenberg clan are dopplegangers of people associated with the Sandy Hook massacre.

Here’s Jennifer Greenberg on Stars Color, a website with pictures of people in the movie industry — actors, actresses, directors — which suggests Greenberg is an actress, albeit not a famous or even known one:

Nothing like a little racial prejudice to get everyone's goats. Or yea duh white people look alike. I know this will do good to cut through your dogma but those two women do look exactly the same at all. Yes they are white but thats about it other than race they do not look alike at all. Lol you guys are too much.
 
Last edited:
Sandy Hook Rampage – Gene Rosen’s CODE NAME Mr. Stacato _PoliceStateRadio

Sandy Hook Rampage - Gene Rosen's CODE NAME Mr. Stacato _PoliceStateRadio | Politics

Remember the pedobear, Gene Rosen. It's Eugene Rosen, FEMA rep. Notice where the NWO tried to take his name out of the old story when the People found out about it.

FEMA_-_37563_-_FEMA_representatives_talking_with_children_at_a_Law_Enforcement_celebration_in_Texas.jpg


27 dead in Newtown, CT elementary school - Page 42

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/ind...ration_in_​Texas.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=89255677

Interesting. I'd heard a bit on this, but not in this much detail, thanks.
 
Newtown Mother Exposing Sandy Hook Corruption at Public Hearing

Newtown-Resident.png


In a furious presentation of mixed words a Newtown resident lays out her thoughts during a Bipartisan Task Force Public Hearing.
By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
February 5, 2013
NEWTOWN HIGH SCHOOL — In a strange twist of events, Susan McGuinness Getzinger (a local resident) has come forward regarding shady actions in the Connecticut school system.

The woman stated that her husband was killed in a fatal car accident the night after she protested local corruption at a previous public hearing.

The woman calls out the 3 top administrators of the Newtown School District and mentions a law firms involvement.

The woman states in the hearing, “You walk into your PPT or Educational Hearing, they are all in on it. The staff is told not to identify, they can’t pay their mortgage if they speak out against it. It’s wrong. Fix it. Dead Kid’s that’s the price got it?”.

The woman is rather scattered during her presentation, but goes on to end the presentation before being swiftly removed from the podium with, “Adam Lanza was the first victim cause he probably had medical problems, and the attorneys sealed the records!”.

A speaker cuts the woman off as she is whisked off stage.

(Clapping)


The woman also states that there were three schools in lockdown the day of the Sandy Hook School Shooting, but then never follows up on the statement in a manner that one can follow.

Newtown Mother Exposing Sandy Hook Corruption at Public Hearing :
 
Newtown Mother Exposing Sandy Hook Corruption at Public Hearing

Newtown-Resident.png


In a furious presentation of mixed words a Newtown resident lays out her thoughts during a Bipartisan Task Force Public Hearing.
By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
February 5, 2013
NEWTOWN HIGH SCHOOL — In a strange twist of events, Susan McGuinness Getzinger (a local resident) has come forward regarding shady actions in the Connecticut school system.

The woman stated that her husband was killed in a fatal car accident the night after she protested local corruption at a previous public hearing.

The woman calls out the 3 top administrators of the Newtown School District and mentions a law firms involvement.

The woman states in the hearing, “You walk into your PPT or Educational Hearing, they are all in on it. The staff is told not to identify, they can’t pay their mortgage if they speak out against it. It’s wrong. Fix it. Dead Kid’s that’s the price got it?”.

The woman is rather scattered during her presentation, but goes on to end the presentation before being swiftly removed from the podium with, “Adam Lanza was the first victim cause he probably had medical problems, and the attorneys sealed the records!”.

A speaker cuts the woman off as she is whisked off stage.

(Clapping)


The woman also states that there were three schools in lockdown the day of the Sandy Hook School Shooting, but then never follows up on the statement in a manner that one can follow.

Newtown Mother Exposing Sandy Hook Corruption at Public Hearing :


Interesting, thanks for sharing. Not really sure what she meant when she said "they are all in on it". In on what?
 
Interesting, thanks for sharing. Not really sure what she meant when she said "they are all in on it". In on what?

Good grief. The lady is talking about texting while driving. Her husbands death had no connection to the Sandy Hook event. It is a sad coincidence the husband died after her presentation at another meeting.
This is a prime example of taking something totally out of context and trying to tie it to another event.

and her kids can't eat peanuts and popcorn?
 
Good grief. The lady is talking about texting while driving. Her husbands death had no connection to the Sandy Hook event. It is a sad coincidence the husband died after her presentation at another meeting.
This is a prime example of taking something totally out of context and trying to tie it to another event.

and her kids can't eat peanuts and popcorn?

Moving this thread to a thread that deals with Sandy Hook in general:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/consp...ngs-w-24-a-post1061504781.html#post1061504781
 
If Sandy Hook shooting is a hoax, no others could do it except the Feds because so many resources were activated: police, media, government officials and informants (some were called as "actors" by people.) And they of course would let out disinformation to meddle the water.
Here is a doctored picture. Madeline and Samantha have no legs in the photo.

skitched-108-20130109-134449.jpg


And they deliberately let Madeline wearing Emilie's dress in photo with Obama. At the purpose to confusing people then to prove the suspicious people are "conspiracy theorist". Remember, no others have the motive and resource to do that. Those who could take pictures of Obama and Samantha have the privilege or that photo was a product of the "strategy office"(disinformation office) too.

Sandy_Hook_school_shooting__President_Obama_prepares_to_address_Newtown_at_emotional_memorial_service_%7C_Mail_Online-20130107-213029.jpg

---
That picture was created particularly to mislead people to conclude Emily hadn't died. (they let Madeline wear Emily's dress) That's a trap set up for suspicious people. It proves even the president could be obedient actor to be manipulated by the perpetrator. See how happy those actors are. Are they family members who just lost a lovely girl and after memory service, or it was a celebrating party?
 
If Sandy Hook shooting is a hoax, no others could do it except the Feds because so many resources were activated: police, media, government officials and informants (some were called as "actors" by people.) And they of course would let out disinformation to meddle the water.
Here is a doctored picture. Madeline and Samantha have no legs in the photo.

skitched-108-20130109-134449.jpg


And they deliberately let Madeline wearing Emilie's dress in photo with Obama. At the purpose to confusing people then to prove the suspicious people are "conspiracy theorist". Remember, no others have the motive and resource to do that. Those who could take pictures of Obama and Samantha have the privilege or that photo was a product of the "strategy office"(disinformation office) too.

Sandy_Hook_school_shooting__President_Obama_prepares_to_address_Newtown_at_emotional_memorial_service_%7C_Mail_Online-20130107-213029.jpg

---
That picture was created particularly to mislead people to conclude Emily hadn't died. (they let Madeline wear Emily's dress) That's a trap set up for suspicious people. It proves even the president could be obedient actor to be manipulated by the perpetrator. See how happy those actors are. Are they family members who just lost a lovely girl and after memory service, or it was a celebrating party?

Wow "no legs" thats dishonest even for you. What do you suppose that white stuff is below Samantha? I clearly see her legs there and its also obvious that Madeline's legs are obscured by both her sisters leg and her dads leg.

Its post's like what you just posted that discredit Conspiracy theorists. Its right up there with pretending that the twin towers were brought down by demolitions just because you think it sort of resembles what you think a demolition looks like.

And you assert that it must be the feds because hey only the feds could make police, media, government officials and informants all work together. you left out a whole region of a county that live in that area. How come no one came forward that lives in that area? What is the entire area in on it? thats roughly 27,560 people and lets not forget that those people have families and then there are neighboring communities that would be in the know as well of at least that it wasnt real. There would be a huge trail to follow so big that you from the comfort of your home could show us some proof but you cant can you? All that you can do is make up theories of what ifs.

Whats even funnier is you saying that Madeline wore Emile's dress to make conspiracy theorists look like nuts. That is just too funny.
 
Wow "no legs" thats dishonest even for you. What do you suppose that white stuff is below Samantha? I clearly see her legs there and its also obvious that Madeline's legs are obscured by both her sisters leg and her dads leg.

.

Watch that picture again. If that white part is Samantha's leg, then she is a little Mermaid? The legs part of Robbie Parker is cut from some other photo. It doesn't fit Mr. Parker's body, either in size or location.

Government monopolized the news agency. They censored the important news of Sandy Hook shootings. Sandy Hook - Judge seals police records for 90 days. It helps to fume suspicion of people. Why did they release so much inconsistent information on Sandy Hook shooting?

Do you know why they released the following news (MANY 9-11 "HIJACKERS" ARE STILL ALIVE)? Because there are many people work for government as informants. They are afraid of becoming sacrifices when they were told to carry out a mission. So the late news (hijackers still alive) released to comfort them. Now we saw so many disinformation released later after Sandy Hook shooting. It hints "we didn't kill that many children". That's the trick how the government fool you the people.

MANY 9-11 "HIJACKERS" ARE STILL ALIVE.

hijackers-still-alive.jpg

The world's media has reported that many of the so-called hijackers "fingered" by the FBI are still alive. For example the BBC (British Broadcasting Cooperation) carried this report:

Hijack "suspects" alive and well.

The following article is a remake of http://www.mujahideen.fsnet.co.uk/wtc/wtc-hijackers.htm which lists many of the media articles dealing with the hijackers who were not hijackers.

Many 9-11 "Hijackers" are Still Alive.
 
Watch that picture again. If that white part is Samantha's leg, then she is a little Mermaid? The legs part of Robbie Parker is cut from some other photo. It doesn't fit Mr. Parker's body, either in size or location.

Government monopolized the news agency. They censored the important news of Sandy Hook shootings. Sandy Hook - Judge seals police records for 90 days. It helps to fume suspicion of people. Why did they release so much inconsistent information on Sandy Hook shooting?

Do you know why they released the following news (MANY 9-11 "HIJACKERS" ARE STILL ALIVE)? Because there are many people work for government as informants. They are afraid of becoming sacrifices when they were told to carry out a mission. So the late news (hijackers still alive) released to comfort them. Now we saw so many disinformation released later after Sandy Hook shooting. It hints "we didn't kill that many children". That's the trick how the government fool you the people.

Wow dude if you cant visualize things this simple no wonder you cant grasp most things and create a fantasy to explain what you are unable to understand.

Im not sure if I should laugh at you or be concerned that you have a condition of some sort that needs care.
 
Coming up on 4 months after the fact, more and more evidence comes to light that strongly suggests this was a staged event, done under color of a FEMA exercise.
 
Coming up on 4 months after the fact, more and more evidence comes to light that strongly suggests this was a staged event, done under color of a FEMA exercise.

and what evidence would that be HD? Please share your information and sources.
 
and what evidence would that be HD? Please share your information and sources.

Incorrect dates. Incriminating pictures and contradictory statements. Styles of story telling similar to 911. Impossible shooting, memorial funds set up by parents and others on the same day of the event. Very strange coincidences. And on and on.
 
Incorrect dates. Incriminating pictures and contradictory statements. Styles of story telling similar to 911. Impossible shooting, memorial funds set up by parents and others on the same day of the event. Very strange coincidences. And on and on.

I asked for your sources. You provided none.

What incriminating pictures ?
What contradictory statements.
Styles of story telling similar to 911. Please provide analysis that this is the case. I don't see it.
Impossible shooting. Styles of story telling similar to 911.
Memorial funds set up by parents and others on the same day of the event. Please provide your evidence of this.

HD, one cannot discuss your points if you do not provide the evidence so we are looking at the same information.

Are you just trolling or do you want to debate/
 
I asked for your sources. You provided none.

What incriminating pictures ?
What contradictory statements.
Styles of story telling similar to 911. Please provide analysis that this is the case. I don't see it.
Impossible shooting. Styles of story telling similar to 911.
Memorial funds set up by parents and others on the same day of the event. Please provide your evidence of this.

HD, one cannot discuss your points if you do not provide the evidence so we are looking at the same information.

Are you just trolling or do you want to debate/

I love the discussion Mike--that's why I'm here.

But I do my "teaching" as part of my job as a flight instructor. Here on the internet, one cannot really have a discussion with a person that is uninformed on whatever the subject matter is. Rip Van Winkle was not up to speed on current events because he was sleeping. So too, some posters live under a rock it seems.

If a person is willing to inform himself, I am thrilled to converse with him, whether we agree or don't. I have no desire to try to educate you about the evidence available regarding Newtown.
 
Back
Top Bottom