Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives $69,000,000 taken in by mega church; Originally Posted by A_Wise_Fool Nice point. I guess you believe all muslims are terrorists too? I mean, if one does ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-07, 10:58 AM   #21 (permalink)
Young Money Millionaire


 
Hatuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Today 08:07 AM
Posts: 12,285
Thanks: 2,578
Thanked 2,816 Times in 1,812 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Busy
Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by A_Wise_Fool View Post
Nice point. I guess you believe all muslims are terrorists too? I mean, if one does it, they ALL must do it. I don't see why that philosophy you possess should stop at megachurches. It must make life pretty simple for you.

I'll admit 700K is way too much for a miinster's house. But people donating for eductation is something I see nothing wrong with. If he applied for financial aid then you might just have "donated" your tax dollers to his education as well. People certainly have done so for mine and I don't think God is mad at them.
....you make $130,000 a year and can't afford to pay for your own education? I smell a rat.
__________________
Wasilla : Population 7,000 - Alaska : Population : San Bernadino.
Hatuey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 11-14-07, 12:00 PM   #22 (permalink)
Guru

 
Cephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Last Online: Today 12:14 PM
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 3,049
Thanks: 402
Thanked 643 Times in 467 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
....you make $130,000 a year and can't afford to pay for your own education? I smell a rat.
Exactly. This loser has a $700k house and at least $135k income and he's saying he's got to move into a house for the homeless, drug users and prostitutes called the Dream House.

Um... isn't that what got him into trouble in the first place? Hookers and drugs? I can't imagine being there would be less than a dream for him!
__________________
I'm not anti-religion, I'm anti-hypocrisy.

Blog me! http://BitchSpot.JadeDragonOnline.com
Cephus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-14-07, 01:03 PM   #23 (permalink)
Guru

 
UtahBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 02:35 PM
Location: Logan, Utah
Posts: 3,505
Thanks: 168
Thanked 591 Times in 425 Posts
Lean: Moderate
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Navy:  12.5 years active duty, 10 years Reserves. 

Thread Starter Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cephus View Post
Exactly. This loser has a $700k house and at least $135k income and he's saying he's got to move into a house for the homeless, drug users and prostitutes called the Dream House.

Um... isn't that what got him into trouble in the first place? Hookers and drugs? I can't imagine being there would be less than a dream for him!
Poor little man, looking for sympathy, and drugs, and sex with other poor little men. He can get the drugs and sex on the street, we know that from his past history, but you can't get sympathy on the street. He will have to go to those who are stupid enough to give him cash, confusing that as some kind of cure for those in need of sympathy. What he needs is a good kick in the posterior.
BTW, ORU is in trouble as well. Seems Oral's son and daughter-in-law have tapped into church funds for personal fun....
__________________
The Age of Reason doesn't have to be a thing of the past.
Being judgemental is the prime directive of some evangelicals.
No success can compensate for failure in the home.
UtahBill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-14-07, 01:49 PM   #24 (permalink)
Guru

 
Cephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Last Online: Today 12:14 PM
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 3,049
Thanks: 402
Thanked 643 Times in 467 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by UtahBill View Post
BTW, ORU is in trouble as well. Seems Oral's son and daughter-in-law have tapped into church funds for personal fun....
And we're surprised? It's yet another slimeball evangelist fleecing the flock for personal gain.
Cephus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-14-07, 02:04 PM   #25 (permalink)
Young Money Millionaire


 
Hatuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Today 08:07 AM
Posts: 12,285
Thanks: 2,578
Thanked 2,816 Times in 1,812 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Busy
Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cephus View Post
Exactly. This loser has a $700k house and at least $135k income and he's saying he's got to move into a house for the homeless, drug users and prostitutes called the Dream House.

Um... isn't that what got him into trouble in the first place? Hookers and drugs? I can't imagine being there would be less than a dream for him!
I won't disclose how much I make yearly....but I will say one thing. Even if he made "just" over $110,000 a year, not counting any side projects he might have, he'd live VERY comfortably and would be able to afford most schools. I mean seriously...you own a $700K home...and you expect people to believe you can't pay for your own education?
Hatuey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-14-07, 02:39 PM   #26 (permalink)
Guru

 
UtahBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 02:35 PM
Location: Logan, Utah
Posts: 3,505
Thanks: 168
Thanked 591 Times in 425 Posts
Lean: Moderate
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Navy:  12.5 years active duty, 10 years Reserves. 

Thread Starter Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
I won't disclose how much I make yearly....but I will say one thing. Even if he made "just" over $110,000 a year, not counting any side projects he might have, he'd live VERY comfortably and would be able to afford most schools. I mean seriously...you own a $700K home...and you expect people to believe you can't pay for your own education?
The wife and I own 2 homes, and the combined value of the 2 MIGHT be $700 thousand....and they are nice homes! The AZ one is for sale, but with the market like it is, and our reluctance to give it away, we will likely own it for a few more years.
And we can honestly say that the only rich relative who ever helped us out is our Uncle Sam. He educated me in the Navy, and paid some GI bill for college later on. I only had to give him back 12.5 years of my life.
Kind of fun for me to see the greedy scammers get their comeuppance...
UtahBill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-15-07, 10:22 AM   #27 (permalink)
Sage

 
Stinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Last Online: 09-22-08 02:45 PM
Location: The South
Posts: 14,108
Thanks: 191
Thanked 382 Times in 311 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

The question is what can be done about it if anything at all. Separation of Church and State goes both ways. If they are reporting their taxes correctly and legally not much to government can do. If the government tries to regulate them in any way...............................

Still shameful that someone lives an extravagant life of donations people give based on religious affilitation.
__________________
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." Marcus Aurelius
Proud member of the Gang of Five, the gang that is always right!
No Personal Attacks, if you can't debate the issue go elsewhere.
Stinger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-15-07, 01:06 PM   #28 (permalink)
Guru

 
Cephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Last Online: Today 12:14 PM
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 3,049
Thanks: 402
Thanked 643 Times in 467 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinger View Post
The question is what can be done about it if anything at all. Separation of Church and State goes both ways. If they are reporting their taxes correctly and legally not much to government can do. If the government tries to regulate them in any way...............................
The government already regulates it and should go even farther. They determine who is and is not a legitimate religion and/or non-profit entity and grants tax exempt status. Churches should be required, as part of their tax exempt status, to prove on a year-to-year basis, that they are actually non-profit. Giving their ministers million-dollar houses and five Mercedes and trips to the Bahamas is not non-profit in any way, it's out and out fraud.
Cephus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-15-07, 08:57 PM   #29 (permalink)
Sage

 
Stinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Last Online: 09-22-08 02:45 PM
Location: The South
Posts: 14,108
Thanks: 191
Thanked 382 Times in 311 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cephus View Post
The government already regulates it and should go even farther. They determine who is and is not a legitimate religion and/or non-profit entity and grants tax exempt status. Churches should be required, as part of their tax exempt status, to prove on a year-to-year basis, that they are actually non-profit.
As I said as long as as they are meeting the requirements of the law there is probably little that can be done. If we try to change the law then my question, what do we do about it. Change it how that doesn't violate the constitution.

Publicizing it, making it a public issue, educating people about the most egregious ones but churches can pay high salaries if they choose and as long as the board approves it there is not much that can be done.

Quote:
Giving their ministers million-dollar houses and five Mercedes and trips to the Bahamas is not non-profit in any way, it's out and out fraud.
I bet we find the church is not doing that directly. But I hope they do catch some of the thiefs parading as preachers.
Stinger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-16-07, 12:38 AM   #30 (permalink)
User
 
foundit66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: 04-05-08 03:02 PM
Posts: 97
Thanks: 9
Thanked 26 Times in 19 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Goofy
Re: $69,000,000 taken in by mega church

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinger View Post
The question is what can be done about it if anything at all. Separation of Church and State goes both ways. If they are reporting their taxes correctly and legally not much to government can do. If the government tries to regulate them in any way...............................

Still shameful that someone lives an extravagant life of donations people give based on religious affilitation.
1) If the money is not being spent as the donors intend, that could account to fraud.
Separation of church and state does not protect people from legal prosecution for crimes.

2) If donations to the organization do not qualify as "tax deductible", that should also be realized.
If I were to donate for Donald Trump to party at the Playboy mansion, I wouldn't expect that to be deductible.
If he turned into "Reverend" Trump and the same happened, it still isn't tax deductible.
__________________
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
foundit66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by JustineCredible
· · ·
Member Galleries
996 photos
202 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO