- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 31,926
- Reaction score
- 29,388
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada Dual citizen
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
And that change without a referendum for choices I am against.
Do you really want to include the words 'referendum' and 'Quebec' in the same sentence? But that also raises a question, do you use the first-past-the-post system, yes no in a referendum, or do we get multiple choices and use the new system?
This may well end up being a can of worms Justin will choose to leave unopened through the next election, which will be easy enough to do if he can brand the Tories and the NDP as "obstructionist". It also depends a great deal on the outcome of the new 'waffle' in NDP ranks, reacting to the loss to Trudeau with a hard left turn. And that is a long road to nowhere, already occupied by the Green Party on the eco front, and at odds with unionized labour, the traditional support for the NDP. One set of thinking sees a split to a "labour waffle" or more appropriately a "Labour Party".
Three years or more from now, Trudeau would be a fool not to call a snap election amid such disarray on the left. And we already know he's drawing a line in the sand on an East-West pipeline; he is bound and determined to sell the idea in Quebec.
The true definition of a Canadian parliamentary democracy is one where the government calls elections when they can win, or have run out of time. Trudeau strikes me as the former