Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > In the news > *Breaking News* - Mainstream Media



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-09, 12:22 PM   #1
Hippie hater

 
texmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Today 06:37 PM
Location: Dallas TEXAS
Posts: 1,209
Thanks: 517
Thanked 291 Times in 192 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

For those still claiming a civilian court wont be harmful, NOW do you believe us?

NEW YORK (AP) - The five men facing trial in the Sept. 11 attacks will plead not guilty so that they can air their criticisms of U.S. foreign policy, the lawyer for one of the defendants said Sunday.

Scott Fenstermaker, the lawyer for accused terrorist Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, said the men would not deny their role in the 2001 attacks but "would explain what happened and why they did it."

The U.S. Justice Department announced earlier this month that Ali and four other men accused of murdering nearly 3,000 people in the deadliest terrorist attack in the U.S. will face a civilian federal trial just blocks from the site of the destroyed World Trade Center.

Ali, also known as Ammar al-Baluchi, is a nephew of professed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Mohammed, Ali and the others will explain "their assessment of American foreign policy," Fenstermaker said.

"Their assessment is negative," he said.


Anyone still professing civilian courts over military courts need to do two things.


Defend the cost of bringing them to New York instead of a military trial Its 75 million so far.

Then defend the access they will get to the press which has now been proven to be what they want.


Then explain how this isn't harmful

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091122/D9C4RM3O1.html
__________________


I have to treat women with respect because I'm not good looking enough to treat them like sex objects

Last edited by texmaster; 11-23-09 at 12:24 PM.
texmaster is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-09, 12:26 PM   #2
pro-homosexual bigot



 
Redress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Last Seen: Today 06:33 PM
Location: Michigan, home of the unemployed
Posts: 13,679
Thanks: 1,859
Thanked 4,826 Times in 2,905 Posts
Lean: Liberal

US Navy:  In the navy from 1987 to 1993, leaving honorably at end of enlistment as an AT2. 
Total Awards: 1

Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
For those still claiming a civilian court wont be harmful, NOW do you believe us?
I still think there is no harm in it. They can air their views, and we can laugh at and condemn them. Words are harmless.
__________________
We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers.--Lindsey Graham
Redress is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-09, 12:33 PM   #3
sailorgirl

 
liblady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 12:51 PM
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,620
Thanks: 497
Thanked 1,003 Times in 695 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
For those still claiming a civilian court wont be harmful, NOW do you believe us?

NEW YORK (AP) - The five men facing trial in the Sept. 11 attacks will plead not guilty so that they can air their criticisms of U.S. foreign policy, the lawyer for one of the defendants said Sunday.

Scott Fenstermaker, the lawyer for accused terrorist Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, said the men would not deny their role in the 2001 attacks but "would explain what happened and why they did it."

The U.S. Justice Department announced earlier this month that Ali and four other men accused of murdering nearly 3,000 people in the deadliest terrorist attack in the U.S. will face a civilian federal trial just blocks from the site of the destroyed World Trade Center.

Ali, also known as Ammar al-Baluchi, is a nephew of professed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Mohammed, Ali and the others will explain "their assessment of American foreign policy," Fenstermaker said.

"Their assessment is negative," he said.


Anyone still professing civilian courts over military courts need to do two things.


Defend the cost of bringing them to New York instead of a military trial Its 75 million so far.

Then defend the access they will get to the press which has now been proven to be what they want.


Then explain how this isn't harmful

My Way News - Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views
how is it harmful? the civilized world doesn't give a crap about why they did it, and we already know what happened.
__________________
i'm only here for the booze
and especially for catz,
SOMETHING ANNOYING and colorful
liblady is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-09, 12:52 PM   #4
Hippie hater

 
texmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Today 06:37 PM
Location: Dallas TEXAS
Posts: 1,209
Thanks: 517
Thanked 291 Times in 192 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redress View Post
I still think there is no harm in it. They can air their views, and we can laugh at and condemn them. Words are harmless.
Really. Words are Harmless

So how did Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and rest of the murderers get to power? A picture show?

Are you really this naive?
__________________


I have to treat women with respect because I'm not good looking enough to treat them like sex objects
texmaster is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-09, 12:53 PM   #5
Hippie hater

 
texmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Today 06:37 PM
Location: Dallas TEXAS
Posts: 1,209
Thanks: 517
Thanked 291 Times in 192 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by liblady View Post
how is it harmful? the civilized world doesn't give a crap about why they did it, and we already know what happened.
Now we get to the heart of the problem.

Western Countries aren't the only ones with TV or know how to use the internet.

Islamic Terrorists will USE this to recruit MORE members.

Here's some reading material on how they do it with the internet alone

The Web as Weapon - washingtonpost.com
__________________


I have to treat women with respect because I'm not good looking enough to treat them like sex objects
texmaster is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-09, 02:26 PM   #6
By-Tor & Dog
 
hazlnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Last Seen: Today 03:27 PM
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,349
Thanks: 330
Thanked 898 Times in 524 Posts
Lean: Moderate
Gender: Male
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
For those still claiming a civilian court wont be harmful, NOW do you believe us?
First of all, who is us? The pathetically uniformed rubes that watch Glenn Beck?

Secondly, they've been prosecuting terrorists in civilian courts for years. The Federal prosecutors have become experts in protecting national security interests while presenting winning cases.

Thirdly, if they are acquitted (which they won't be) they can still be held as enemy combatants indefinitely.

Pick up a newspaper before sticking your foot in your mouth.
__________________
President Merkin Muffley: Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.
hazlnut is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to hazlnut For This Useful Post:
Old 11-23-09, 03:05 PM   #7
Hippie hater

 
texmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Today 06:37 PM
Location: Dallas TEXAS
Posts: 1,209
Thanks: 517
Thanked 291 Times in 192 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
First of all, who is us? The pathetically uniformed rubes that watch Glenn Beck?
No the incredibly niave people who actually believe giving terrorists a platform for their hate and putting it in the #1 target city in the US is actually a good thing.

Quote:
Secondly, they've been prosecuting terrorists in civilian courts for years.The Federal prosecutors have become experts in protecting national security interests while presenting winning cases.
Could you get lamer in that response? Can you name ANY terrorist ever tried that even killed 1/5th the people on US soil that were killed on 9.11? Talk about a pathetic excuse.

You do realize there are degrees in attacks right? Not all terrorist attacks are as destructive or kill as many people as the largest terrorist attack on us soil in US HISTORY

Quote:
Thirdly, if they are acquitted (which they won't be) they can still be held as enemy combatants indefinitely.
Which completly negates the last pathetic argument of using civilian courts to "show the world" our court system.

Starting to get it yet?

Quote:
Pick up a newspaper before sticking your foot in your mouth.
Wow are you uninformed.

All you have proven is that you excel in epic failure in proving a civilian court is better than a military court.

Well done genius.

Write back when you actually can justify the cost and show trial of doing it in civilian court vs military.
__________________


I have to treat women with respect because I'm not good looking enough to treat them like sex objects

Last edited by texmaster; 11-23-09 at 03:10 PM.
texmaster is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-09, 03:25 PM   #8
Here come the drums!
 
Agent Ferris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Last Seen: 01-28-10 02:41 AM
Posts: 1,543
Thanks: 54
Thanked 332 Times in 248 Posts
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redress View Post
I still think there is no harm in it. They can air their views, and we can laugh at and condemn them. Words are harmless.
So you think they deserve a platform to launch anti-American propaganda? Why?
__________________
No. No. That wasn't funny. You see, I'm not making myself very clear. Funny is like this: Not funny is like this And right now, I'm not like this I'm like this

So, earthlings! Um... basically, end of the world.
Agent Ferris is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Agent Ferris For This Useful Post:
Old 11-23-09, 03:30 PM   #9
Here come the drums!
 
Agent Ferris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Last Seen: 01-28-10 02:41 AM
Posts: 1,543
Thanks: 54
Thanked 332 Times in 248 Posts
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
First of all, who is us? The pathetically uniformed rubes that watch Glenn Beck?
No it's anyone who thinks that these people shouldn't be handed a platform from which to launch anti-American propaganda.
__________________
No. No. That wasn't funny. You see, I'm not making myself very clear. Funny is like this: Not funny is like this And right now, I'm not like this I'm like this

So, earthlings! Um... basically, end of the world.
Agent Ferris is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Agent Ferris For This Useful Post:
Old 11-23-09, 04:34 PM   #10
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Last Seen: Today 03:47 PM
Posts: 511
Thanks: 118
Thanked 56 Times in 49 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
For those still claiming a civilian court wont be harmful, NOW do you believe us?

NEW YORK (AP) - The five men facing trial in the Sept. 11 attacks will plead not guilty so that they can air their criticisms of U.S. foreign policy, the lawyer for one of the defendants said Sunday.

Scott Fenstermaker, the lawyer for accused terrorist Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, said the men would not deny their role in the 2001 attacks but "would explain what happened and why they did it."

The U.S. Justice Department announced earlier this month that Ali and four other men accused of murdering nearly 3,000 people in the deadliest terrorist attack in the U.S. will face a civilian federal trial just blocks from the site of the destroyed World Trade Center.

Ali, also known as Ammar al-Baluchi, is a nephew of professed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Mohammed, Ali and the others will explain "their assessment of American foreign policy," Fenstermaker said.

"Their assessment is negative," he said.


Anyone still professing civilian courts over military courts need to do two things.


Defend the cost of bringing them to New York instead of a military trial Its 75 million so far.

Then defend the access they will get to the press which has now been proven to be what they want.


Then explain how this isn't harmful

My Way News - Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views
How is the harmful? Freedom of speech?
__________________
Just because my tag is "slightly liberal" doesn't mean I am the stereotypical person on the left.
pro-bipartisan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts