Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > In the news > *Breaking News* - Mainstream Media



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-09, 10:42 PM   #71
Here come the drums!
 
Agent Ferris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Last Seen: 01-28-10 02:41 AM
Posts: 1,543
Thanks: 54
Thanked 332 Times in 248 Posts
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orius View Post
Are you afraid that they might speak the truth?
The truth? You mean the real reason why they attacked us that has nothing to do with our foreign policy but rather with the Islamist foreign policy of bringing the entire world of dar al-Harb into the fold of dar al-Islam through offensive jihad?
__________________
No. No. That wasn't funny. You see, I'm not making myself very clear. Funny is like this: Not funny is like this And right now, I'm not like this I'm like this

So, earthlings! Um... basically, end of the world.
Agent Ferris is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-09, 10:15 AM   #72
Educator
 
SE102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 11:55 PM
Location: College of WM
Posts: 743
Thanks: 174
Thanked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

[quote=Agent Ferris;1058384830]The Constitution is not an international treaty sport.



It's clear from your statements that you believe that this should be a trial of the U.S. and not the terrorists who murdered 3,000 U.S. civilians.

Come on...



Provide evidence of a systematic genocide perpetrated by the U.S..

Whats so special about systematic?

Yes the Islamic conquerors who now rule Afghanistan perpetrated massive genocide and forced population transfers on the indigenous peoples of the Indian subcontinent. In fact prior to Stalin and Hitler this was the largest genocide in history.



In Vietnam the U.S. was in a legitimate military conflict against communist aggression.

Started through illegal means, Tonkin Gulf wiki it...

The U.S. doesn't target civilians.

Only it has on many many many occasions, not recently, it conducts its war in a much more politically intelligent manner nowadays.

Was a legitimate military target and there were no civilians present as at that time Germany was engaged in total war.

Wait I thought we didnt commit genocide... so the 'civilians' were actually military targets because of a magical term you call 'total war' which has no place in reality took effect?

Was a legitimate military target and there were no civilians present as at that time Japan was engaged in total war.

Except a few hundred thousand civilians died. :

A) There was at least one attack on a U.S. ship in the Gulf of Tonkin, and the Gulf of Tonkin was only a precursor to escalation in a war which had already begun and which had been started by the communists.

B) All 16 members of the U.S. intelligence community as well as numerous foreign intelligence agencies believed Saddam had WMD, a lie implies intent to deceive. And; furthermore, Iraq had been collaborating with Islamist terrorists (including AQ affiliates) to attack the U.S. right up until the fall of Baghdad and had perpetrated numerous acts of war against the U.S..

Thats nice selective false information for you
Quote:


Trials by military tribunal are not antithetical to those concepts. But ya I suppose in your assbackwards worldview unlawful alien combatants have an unalienable right to a platform to justify the murder of 3,000 U.S. civilians.




Once again why do you believe that these people have a right to a platform from which to launch anti-American propaganda, and justify the murder of 3,000 U.S. civilians?

I'm assbackwards? You're the american I presume.

Most people would look at your post then put a finger to their head and start making a circle.
SE102 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-09, 10:20 AM   #73
Educator
 
SE102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 11:55 PM
Location: College of WM
Posts: 743
Thanks: 174
Thanked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
Oh yes. That is what we're afraid of. We ceratinly know they wouldn't lie about their treatment or reasoning to gain headlines and increase their numbers.

We'll call you guys when we need more beer mmmkay?
How does their being terrorists alter their integrity more so or less so than any other man.

They're probably very righteous people.

But I must be a naive lib I'm sure they would lie. They'd probably say the US set up a torture camp or something.
SE102 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-09, 01:12 PM   #74
Hippie hater

 
texmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Today 09:32 AM
Location: Dallas TEXAS
Posts: 1,278
Thanks: 540
Thanked 300 Times in 197 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
How does their being terrorists alter their integrity more so or less so than any other man.
Because it doesn't make the increbille mistake of comparing them to common criminals.

Quote:
They're probably very righteous people.
Its called Islamic fundamentalists.

Quote:
But I must be a naive lib I'm sure they would lie. They'd probably say the US set up a torture camp or something.
And yet you support giving them that platform.
__________________
I have to treat women with respect because I'm not good looking enough to treat them like sex objects
texmaster is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-09, 01:13 PM   #75
Hippie hater

 
texmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Today 09:32 AM
Location: Dallas TEXAS
Posts: 1,278
Thanks: 540
Thanked 300 Times in 197 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

The gunman who killed 12 people today at Ft. Hood appears, based on current media reports, to be Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan who was listed as a participant in a Homeland Security Policy Institute's presidential transition task force last year.




Nidal Hasan: Ft. Hood Shooter Participated in Homeland Security Disaster Preparation - Malik nidal hasan - Gawker
__________________
I have to treat women with respect because I'm not good looking enough to treat them like sex objects
texmaster is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-09, 04:03 PM   #76
Educator
 
SE102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 11:55 PM
Location: College of WM
Posts: 743
Thanks: 174
Thanked 90 Times in 75 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
And yet you support giving them that platform.
It's that I don't fear what they have to say.

You can come up with all sorts of cockamamy excuses as to why they should have no right. But some of us want to hear what they have to say.

Because were secretly with the terrists...
__________________
I have come to inform you that you are politically insane and a threat to the state.
SE102 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-09, 04:10 PM   #77
Educator
 
ScottD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 06:34 PM
Posts: 639
Thanks: 98
Thanked 245 Times in 155 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

Quote:
Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
The gunman who killed 12 people today at Ft. Hood appears, based on current media reports, to be Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan who was listed as a participant in a Homeland Security Policy Institute's presidential transition task force last year.




Nidal Hasan: Ft. Hood Shooter Participated in Homeland Security Disaster Preparation - Malik nidal hasan - Gawker
Factcheck proved this as a false article days ago.

Quote:
This is another false e-rumor. Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was merely an audience member at some public events of a university-sponsored group that offered unsolicited advice to the new administration.
Homeland Security Adviser? | FactCheck.org
ScottD is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ScottD For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts