Rudy Giuliani to run for U.S. Senate; If elected may aim for White House in 2012: sou

RightinNYC · 11-19-09, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackboot

Exactly.........but think global collapse, because we are not the only ones.....

And I doubt that will happen either, but this isn't really the thread for that.

Jackboot · 11-19-09, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RightinNYC

And I doubt that will happen either, but this isn't really the thread for that.

I apologize.....this is off topic, it always is.

chevydriver1123 · 11-19-09, 06:30 PM

Rudy is too close to that Authoritarian streak but he may be the one to break up the cluster**** that is Albany. Granted Paterson has done more than our previous Governors. Im making it my job to get heavily involved in all three of the state races this time around.

RightinNYC · 11-19-09, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chevydriver1123

Rudy is too close to that Authoritarian streak but he may be the one to break up the cluster**** that is Albany. Granted Paterson has done more than our previous Governors. Im making it my job to get heavily involved in all three of the state races this time around.

It's funny, but for as terrible as Paterson has been, his polling numbers have freed him up to do things that no governor with a good shot at reelection could do. Even if I really opposed him, I couldn't get that involved in the Governor race - I promised his office that I would vote for him if he appointed someone other than Kennedy to the Senate seat, so I have to follow through on that.

Scarecrow Akhbar · 11-19-09, 07:31 PM

Too bad.

Seems to me that New York would be better served by electing a Senator whose ambition is to serve the people of that state.

New York doesn't really need yet another liberal/socialist Senator.

chevydriver1123 · 11-19-09, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RightinNYC

It's funny, but for as terrible as Paterson has been, his polling numbers have freed him up to do things that no governor with a good shot at reelection could do. Even if I really opposed him, I couldn't get that involved in the Governor race - I promised his office that I would vote for him if he appointed someone other than Kennedy to the Senate seat, so I have to follow through on that.

I hear ya, picking Gillibrand was one of his high points.

Partisan · 11-19-09, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chevydriver1123

Rudy is too close to that Authoritarian streak but he may be the one to break up the cluster**** that is Albany. Granted Paterson has done more than our previous Governors. Im making it my job to get heavily involved in all three of the state races this time around.

I'll be voting across the bridge in Chelsea.....

Partisan · 11-19-09, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RightinNYC

It's funny, but for as terrible as Paterson has been, his polling numbers have freed him up to do things that no governor with a good shot at reelection could do. Even if I really opposed him, I couldn't get that involved in the Governor race - I promised his office that I would vote for him if he appointed someone other than Kennedy to the Senate seat, so I have to follow through on that.

Roger, that....
I'm soooooo happy the farce of Caroline never camre to fruition......
Hildabeest's carpet bagging was bad enough....

Jackboot · 11-19-09, 08:15 PM

I'm sorry.....I may be accused of going off topic, as usual, but why do we need these people, any of them, can anyone explain this to me?

Why do we need a government to lead us, so far they have been nothing more then a complete failure, why would we vote for more of the same? New York is done, no one trusts these crooks anymore, thus no one will turn to this city, the city that wrecked the global economy, you people need to get out fast! The poor and desperate, these people who live here, are the most in the nation, and when the dollar does collapse, you will be in great danger!

I hate to say it, but I am starting to see what drives the radical islamists, this city has a black heart, and no one is paying any attention to it!

Ron Paul was right, and I once disagreed, we have brought this on ourselves.

RightinNYC · 11-19-09, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackboot

I'm sorry.....I may be accused of going off topic, as usual, but why do we need these people, any of them, can anyone explain this to me?

Why do we need a government to lead us, so far they have been nothing more then a complete failure, why would we vote for more of the same? New York is done, no one trusts these crooks anymore, thus no one will turn to this city, the city that wrecked the global economy, you people need to get out fast! The poor and desperate, these people who live here, are the most in the nation, and when the dollar does collapse, you will be in great danger!

I hate to say it, but I am starting to see what drives the radical islamists, this city has a black heart, and no one is paying any attention to it!

Ron Paul was right, and I once disagreed, we have brought this on ourselves.

Just looked out my window and NY is still doing fine.

Seriously, where are you getting the idea that the city is falling apart?

11-19-09, 06:30 PM	#13
chevydriver1123 Free Market Terrorist Join Date: May 2007 Last Seen: Today 07:38 AM Location: Newburgh, New York Posts: 5,871 Thanks: 1,226 Thanked 1,408 Times in 867 Posts Lean: Libertarian Gender:	Re: Rudy Giuliani to run for U.S. Senate; If elected may aim for White House in 2012: Rudy is too close to that Authoritarian streak but he may be the one to break up the cluster**** that is Albany. Granted Paterson has done more than our previous Governors. Im making it my job to get heavily involved in all three of the state races this time around.
	__________________ Blog: http://libertarianblue.blogspot.com/ Death to Socialist Liberals and Authoritarian Conservatives

11-19-09, 07:31 PM	#15
Scarecrow Akhbar Temp Suspended Join Date: Sep 2005 Last Seen: Yesterday 05:45 PM Location: Los Angeles Posts: 10,284 Thanks: 177 Thanked 1,972 Times in 1,380 Posts Lean: Independent Gender:	Re: Rudy Giuliani to run for U.S. Senate; If elected may aim for White House in 2012: Too bad. Seems to me that New York would be better served by electing a Senator whose ambition is to serve the people of that state. New York doesn't really need yet another liberal/socialist Senator.

11-19-09, 08:15 PM	#19
Jackboot Banned Join Date: Sep 2009 Last Seen: 01-21-10 01:59 PM Posts: 744 Thanks: 57 Thanked 143 Times in 100 Posts	Re: Rudy Giuliani to run for U.S. Senate; If elected may aim for White House in 2012: I'm sorry.....I may be accused of going off topic, as usual, but why do we need these people, any of them, can anyone explain this to me? Why do we need a government to lead us, so far they have been nothing more then a complete failure, why would we vote for more of the same? New York is done, no one trusts these crooks anymore, thus no one will turn to this city, the city that wrecked the global economy, you people need to get out fast! The poor and desperate, these people who live here, are the most in the nation, and when the dollar does collapse, you will be in great danger! I hate to say it, but I am starting to see what drives the radical islamists, this city has a black heart, and no one is paying any attention to it! Ron Paul was right, and I once disagreed, we have brought this on ourselves.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode