Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > In the news > *Breaking News* - Mainstream Media



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-09, 02:26 PM   #1
Guru

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Last Seen: Today 12:05 AM
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 957
Thanked 294 Times in 193 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Senate turns away Barack Obama's tainted replacement Roland Burris

Link
Senate turns away Barack Obama's tainted replacement Roland Burris - Times Online

So, the law in the USA is that a State Governor can appoint whomsoever He / She wishes to be seated in the Senate in a situation whereby the sitting Senator is unable to occupy that seat between elections.
Blagojevitch at this time is legally able to do this, he (Blagojevitch) is innocent of any crime that may prevent him from nominating his choice.

So this begs the question.
Whom is holding up the legal process of Mr (Senator) Burris' appointment?
Why it is Senator Reid, who is he?
Senator Reid is the loudmouthed Democratic Majority Leader in the Senate.
He is not exactly a clean sheeted Senator, having had various problems with the rules which govern Senator's behavior in the recent past.
First of all he suggested that without the signature of the Secretary of State of Illinois on the paper appointing the Senator, the appointment is not legal.
The Sec. of State says that his signature is not a legal requirement, he should know his own State's legal requirements.
If it is not a requirement, why should he refuse to follow what he has evidently done before? as for instance with Senator Durbin? Curious?
Back to Senator Reid who obviously has some other agenda where he seeks to bar Mr. (Senator) Burris from taking his lawful seat in the Senate.
I await, along with the rest of the USA for this other Agenda to come to light.

For all the tomfoolery that Senator Reid has been practicing these last few days, I doubt he has gained himself any respect.
jujuman13 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-09, 03:37 PM   #2
Slayer of the DP Newsbot
Dungeon Master

 
danarhea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 11:18 PM
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 18,223
Thanks: 3,328
Thanked 7,021 Times in 3,387 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Dungeon Master:  Thank you. 
Total Awards: 1

Re: Senate turns away Barack Obama's tainted replacement Roland Burris

Quote:
Originally Posted by jujuman13 View Post
Link
Senate turns away Barack Obama's tainted replacement Roland Burris - Times Online

So, the law in the USA is that a State Governor can appoint whomsoever He / She wishes to be seated in the Senate in a situation whereby the sitting Senator is unable to occupy that seat between elections.
Blagojevitch at this time is legally able to do this, he (Blagojevitch) is innocent of any crime that may prevent him from nominating his choice.

So this begs the question.
Whom is holding up the legal process of Mr (Senator) Burris' appointment?
Why it is Senator Reid, who is he?
Senator Reid is the loudmouthed Democratic Majority Leader in the Senate.
He is not exactly a clean sheeted Senator, having had various problems with the rules which govern Senator's behavior in the recent past.
First of all he suggested that without the signature of the Secretary of State of Illinois on the paper appointing the Senator, the appointment is not legal.
The Sec. of State says that his signature is not a legal requirement, he should know his own State's legal requirements.
If it is not a requirement, why should he refuse to follow what he has evidently done before? as for instance with Senator Durbin? Curious?
Back to Senator Reid who obviously has some other agenda where he seeks to bar Mr. (Senator) Burris from taking his lawful seat in the Senate.
I await, along with the rest of the USA for this other Agenda to come to light.

For all the tomfoolery that Senator Reid has been practicing these last few days, I doubt he has gained himself any respect.
No they didn't. All that was a dog and pony show. Watch Burris get seated.
__________________
Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2012

http://danarhea.blogspot.com
danarhea is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts