Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > In the news > *Breaking News*

*Breaking News* Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records; Originally Posted by Binary_Digit Obstructing a criminal investigation is a crime. Not if there wasn't any crime to begin ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-08, 11:46 AM   #61 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 08-07-08 11:41 PM
Posts: 128
Thanks: 13
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binary_Digit View Post
Obstructing a criminal investigation is a crime.
Not if there wasn't any crime to begin with and unless the prosecutor can prove that the CIA records are necessary to prove a crime then the presumption of Executive Privilege applies.
section eight is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Inline Ads
Old 07-20-08, 11:48 AM   #62 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 08-07-08 11:41 PM
Posts: 128
Thanks: 13
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon W. Moon View Post
I'm fine w/ the law. And I'm fine w/ your ...umm... peculiar interpretation. Just pointing out that you're wrong. Feel free to find some case law that supports your interpretation whenever you get a chance. Hint: case law is where you go to see what the interpretation of is.
GL
Look I can read there is absolutely 0 mention of the word "official" in Section 422, so I think the burden of proof would be on YOU the accuser, so you show ME some case law backing up your interpretation, as I've already provided an article from former Federal Prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy who backs up MY interpretation.

Last edited by section eight : 07-20-08 at 11:49 AM.
section eight is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-08, 06:13 PM   #63 (permalink)
I Heart Sarah Palin
Dungeon Master


 
jallman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Today 03:59 AM
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 17,477
Thanks: 3,875
Thanked 3,072 Times in 2,149 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Amazed
Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binary_Digit View Post
Obstructing a criminal investigation is a crime.
Yeah but I wonder if refusing to indulge a histrionic witch hunt is...
jallman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-08, 06:46 PM   #64 (permalink)
Educator

 
cascadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 02:36 PM
Location: In ur threads refuting ur arguments
Posts: 1,040
Thanks: 22
Thanked 171 Times in 128 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by section eight View Post
Look I can read there is absolutely 0 mention of the word "official" in Section 422, so I think the burden of proof would be on YOU the accuser, so you show ME some case law backing up your interpretation, as I've already provided an article from former Federal Prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy who backs up MY interpretation.
McCarthy is also a conservative columnist. He does not cite precedent, so its nothing more than an opinion. As I keep saying, this needs to be argued in front of a judge to see its merits.
__________________
"Fear is the mind killer."
~Bene Gesserit
cascadian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-08, 05:58 AM   #65 (permalink)
aps
Passionate


 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 03:33 AM
Posts: 10,944
Thanks: 2,796
Thanked 1,276 Times in 864 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by section eight View Post
A) It's not the public that is the concern it is hostile foreign governments you are completely misinterpreting the intent of Section 422.

B) Even if you were correct in your assertion that the CIA disclosure doesn't count then guess what? Both Wilson and Armitage both her identity public knowledge as soon as they talked to the press so if you want to prosecute one of them go for it.
Can you share with me when and how Wilson made his wife's identity public?
aps is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-08, 05:59 AM   #66 (permalink)
aps
Passionate


 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 03:33 AM
Posts: 10,944
Thanks: 2,796
Thanked 1,276 Times in 864 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by section eight View Post
Executive privilege will not apply if the prosecutor can show that the testimony is necessary for proving a crime, but as I have shown no crime was committed because the CIA had already divulged her name as did Wilson and then later Armitage.
But as you have shown.........yeah right!
aps is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-08, 01:47 PM   #67 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 08-07-08 11:41 PM
Posts: 128
Thanks: 13
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by aps View Post
Can you share with me when and how Wilson made his wife's identity public?
While he was shopping around his Yellow Cake story, I don't have verifiable evidence but it seems likely and has been reported, but regardless even if it wasn't Wilson then it was Armitage.
section eight is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-08, 01:49 PM   #68 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 08-07-08 11:41 PM
Posts: 128
Thanks: 13
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by aps View Post
But as you have shown.........yeah right!
Read Section 422 of U.S. Code Title 50, even if the CIA leak to the Cubans through the Swiss embassy in Havana doesn't count, because it wasn't "public" then certainly Armitage's (or Wilson's) leak to the press does.
section eight is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-08, 02:04 PM   #69 (permalink)
aps
Passionate


 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 03:33 AM
Posts: 10,944
Thanks: 2,796
Thanked 1,276 Times in 864 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by section eight View Post
While he was shopping around his Yellow Cake story, I don't have verifiable evidence but it seems likely and has been reported, but regardless even if it wasn't Wilson then it was Armitage.
Okay, so you admit that you don't have hard core evidence that Wilson outed his own wife. That's all I was looking for.

I agree--Armitage revealed her name and status to Novak. Tsk tsk on Armitage.
aps is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-08, 02:06 PM   #70 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 08-07-08 11:41 PM
Posts: 128
Thanks: 13
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts

Re: Bush claims privilege to withhold CIA leak records

Quote:
Originally Posted by aps View Post
Okay, so you admit that you don't have hard core evidence that Wilson outed his own wife. That's all I was looking for.

I agree--Armitage revealed her name and status to Novak. Tsk tsk on Armitage.
Ya but he didn't know of her covert status so he didn't commit a crime either.
section eight is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush warns of World War III if Iran goes nuclear bhkad *Breaking News* 159 10-22-07 08:55 AM
Why W will win vauge Archives 7 01-02-06 09:30 PM
Top Ten Reasons Why Jews Should Re-elect President Bush shimshon@shimshon9.com Archives 8 11-02-04 06:33 AM
Arafat Backs Kerry, Israelis Favor Bush shimshon@shimshon9.com Archives 0 10-20-04 02:57 AM
Bush's War-Era Records Damaged vauge Archives 0 07-10-04 08:36 AM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by ngdawg
· · ·
Member Galleries
1010 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO