Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > In the news > *Breaking News*

*Breaking News* Afghanistan mission close to failing - US; Afghanistan mission close to failing - US Afghanistan mission close to failing - US | World news | The Guardian After six years of ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-29-08, 08:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 10-10-08 09:52 AM
Posts: 270
Thanks: 12
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts

Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Afghanistan mission close to failing - US
Afghanistan mission close to failing - US | World news | The Guardian

Quote:
After six years of US-led military support and billions of pounds in aid, security in Afghanistan is "deteriorating" and President Hamid Karzai's government controls less than a third of the country, America's top intelligence official has admitted.

Mike McConnell testified in Washington that Karzai controls about 30% of Afghanistan and the Taliban 10%, and the remainder is under tribal control.

...

The key to the Taliban's success, McConnell said, "is the opportunity for safe haven in Pakistan". Meanwhile the surge in violence has placed a big strain on Nato. The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, has agreed to deploy a battalion outside Kabul after America has criticised European states for refusing to join the fight in the south and Canada threatened to withdraw its troops from Kandahar next year if reinforcements do not arrive.

An Oxfam report yesterday said international and national security forces, as well as warlords, criminals and the Taliban, were perceived by ordinary Afghans as posing security threats.

So neither Iraq or Afghanistan operations are near completion. When are people going to wake up? Six years and what do we have to show for it? Good people lost and billions spent.

Anyway, so he blames Pakistan. Should we expand the conflict into Pakistan? If we attack, but do not occupy. Might we have some success. I thought this was what we should have done in Afghanistan. Just attack those hostile to us, then leave. No need to nation build. No need to occupy. What do you think?
AndrewC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Inline Ads
Old 02-29-08, 09:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
John Galt

 
RightOfCenter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Online: 10-10-08 04:56 PM
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,014
Thanks: 123
Thanked 348 Times in 259 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Brooding
Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewC View Post
Afghanistan mission close to failing - US
Afghanistan mission close to failing - US | World news | The Guardian




So neither Iraq or Afghanistan operations are near completion. When are people going to wake up? Six years and what do we have to show for it? Good people lost and billions spent.

Anyway, so he blames Pakistan. Should we expand the conflict into Pakistan? If we attack, but do not occupy. Might we have some success. I thought this was what we should have done in Afghanistan. Just attack those hostile to us, then leave. No need to nation build. No need to occupy. What do you think?
I agree, our military is not meant to be an occupying force. We can destroy the regular army and navy of any country in the world with ease (especially the weak armed forces of any middle eastern country), but occupation is not what our military was built for.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walrus
The day I use an emoticon instead of the English language to convey my thoughts is the day I start drooling in my lap, eating boogers, and grunting.
RightOfCenter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-08, 09:47 AM   #3 (permalink)
Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 10-10-08 09:52 AM
Posts: 270
Thanks: 12
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts

Thread Starter Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Supposedly the Army upgraded its manual to say that "stability operations" are as important as combat. Check out the article below. I like how he says "instrument of national will". I'm not sure how I feel about our military being an instrument of national will.

The Raw Story | Army manual upgrades nation-building
AndrewC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-08, 10:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
Guru

 
oldreliable67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: 10-08-08 03:13 PM
Posts: 3,120
Thanks: 202
Thanked 294 Times in 207 Posts
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army:  Served honerably in the US Army. 

Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Is the Guardian putting words in McConnell's mouth? I read the article and I see no reference by McConnell to the Afghan mission beging "close to failing." Did I simply miss it, or has the Guardian drawn that conclusion and attributed it to McConnell?
oldreliable67 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldreliable67 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-29-08, 04:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
mpg
Professor

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 06:50 PM
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 2,057
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 147 Times in 121 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewC View Post
Afghanistan mission close to failing - US
Afghanistan mission close to failing - US | World news | The Guardian
Just attack those hostile to us, then leave. No need to nation build. No need to occupy. What do you think?
The Taliban had to be removed from power in order to stop them from harboring AQ.
__________________
"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength." - Eric Hoffer
mpg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-08, 04:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 10-10-08 09:52 AM
Posts: 270
Thanks: 12
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts

Thread Starter Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpg View Post
The Taliban had to be removed from power in order to stop them from harboring AQ.
We didn't remove them. They are still there. They live there. They won't ever leave. Moving them from the capital to the border doesn't accomplish anything.

I fail to see how the current state of Afghanistan would be much different if we had not engaged in an occupation. Well, except maybe by focusing on AQ across borders they wouldn't be as strong as they are now. There was no need to attempt to remove a indigenous people from their home. If they get out of line. We attack, then leave. Cheaper and easier to accomplish than the crap we are involved in now.
AndrewC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-08, 01:21 AM   #7 (permalink)
Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Last Online: Today 07:56 PM
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,767
Thanks: 293
Thanked 386 Times in 282 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewC View Post
So neither Iraq or Afghanistan operations are near completion. When are people going to wake up? Six years and what do we have to show for it? Good people lost and billions spent.

Anyway, so he blames Pakistan. Should we expand the conflict into Pakistan? If we attack, but do not occupy. Might we have some success. I thought this was what we should have done in Afghanistan. Just attack those hostile to us, then leave. No need to nation build. No need to occupy. What do you think?

Afghanistan was a country of lawlessness with no working government.
It was the perfect cover for Al Qaeda.
And we had solid proof that those in control of the country were in direct support of AQ.

Iraq on the other hand, was a fully functional country with very tight security.
They hated AQ and AQ hated them.
Iraq was more of an Ally in the war on terror than an enemy because Iraq did a really good job of keeping AQ out and keeping its influence out.

We should have hit Afghanistan with the full might of the conventional aspect of our military and completely controlled it.
Placing at least 500,000 troops there.
As soon as we had it under complete control, we should have handed it off the the UN. And fully withdrawn to show the Muslim world that we do not intend to control them. While also sending the message that if you attack America you will pay very dearly for it.

Here is the Irony of it all:

All we did with Iraq is turn it into what Afghanistan was BEFORE we attacked Afghanistan.
Now Iraq is a land of lawlessness and ripe for terrorists to infiltrate into the country and even recruit Iraqi citizens.


Only an idiot can deny this.
What gets me is that both conservatives and liberals tend to agree now that this is what we should have done. (Focusing on the terrorists and not Iraq)
But the conservative excuse is, "We didn't know" "Thats history now".
What gets me is that i knew this... just from paying attention to the media from across the world.
So that excuse is pretty lame to me when a painter from Florida knew but we are claiming our government did not.

What should we do now?
Now Bush has got us into such a mess that there is no clear answer.
We turned Iraq into an Afghanistan.
We let the real terrorists get embedded into Pakistan.

The "surge" in Iraq is working. But i think it is working also because of the threat that we could be pulling out soon. This makes the Iraqi people work faster and harder to rebuild.
Iraq kept AQ out prior to our invasion. There is no reason to think that they will fail to do so again.
But we can not just up and leave. We have to leave a secure Iraq.
By following Obama's plan of a slow withdrawal this sends a message that they have to get it together quickly.
And its a hell of a lot better plan than the Bush / McCain plan of global domination.

With a slow Iraq withdrawal, it will show the world that America is willing to work with the world again. And we can get more support for Afghanistan.
We must finish the job in Afghanistan.
Unfortunately Bush has allowed Pakistan to become involved as a shelter.
Obama, Bush, and McCain all see Pakistan the same way. (regardless of McCain's propaganda).
If we have confirmed hard targets we have to go for them.
But it is also essential that we remain on good terms with the Pakistan government.

If we make the wrong moves in Pakistan we could destabilize their government and give power to AQ in the same way that attacking Iraq gave more power to AQ.
We can not allow Pakistan to fall into chaos and essentially hand over nuclear weapons to AQ. Or worse, find ourselves in a position where we have to attack their nuclear sites with our own.

It is essential for world peace and ending terrorism that we regain control of our own country and get these people with Nazi-like ambitions out of our government.
No one trusts America. And with good reason.
Obama will provide a fresh look for America and pursue the proper method to work on the root cause of terrorism.
And as soon as we deal with those that attacked us, he will get us out of there. Not add another country to the list of 153 countries that America has a military presence in.
John1234 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John1234 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-08, 07:10 PM   #8 (permalink)
Sage


 
Navy Pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 10-10-08 08:01 PM
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 24,318
Thanks: 1,725
Thanked 810 Times in 665 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Navy:  Served in Navy from June 1956 until August 1977..Served aboard 6 ships.......Retired as and E7 

Current Mood:
Relaxed
Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

The Guardian huh, one of the most anti American publications in the world........
__________________
http://www.swiftvets.com/

vetsforfreedom.org
Navy Pride is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-08, 07:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
blond bombshell

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Today 01:40 AM
Location: uk
Posts: 3,342
Thanks: 229
Thanked 421 Times in 323 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sassy
Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
The Guardian huh, one of the most anti American publications in the world........
Yea this is true its left leaning paper for armchair socialists.Last time i read it it had an aticle blaiming the darfur crisis on global warming.
__________________
The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.
mikhail is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-08, 07:46 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Online: 05-27-08 11:10 AM
Posts: 3,659
Thanks: 2
Thanked 338 Times in 296 Posts

Re: Afghanistan mission close to failing - US

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewC View Post
So neither Iraq or Afghanistan operations are near completion. When are people going to wake up? Six years and what do we have to show for it? Good people lost and billions spent.
Saddam and the Taliban removed from power.
dixon76710 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dixon76710 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Member Galleries
990 photos
195 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO