• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama flubs in guest book, dates visit "2008"

Legitimate criticism. That I can always accept, even if I disagree. Note, that I criticized both parties (R's in Minnesota, D's in the Senate).

What's ridiculous is this stupid little mistake that anyone can make is being called "absolute proof that he's not fit to be President." When are you guys going to get over people criticizing Bush? Two years later, and you're still stinging. "Ooh, those meanies on the internet and TV said mean things about poor, persecuted George." Really? These things became serious because Cons turned that into a flame-fest about the "liberal media." If you had just said "Yeah, that's a dumb flub, and it's pretty funny..." No. People joke about Palin, and it's a flame-fest. Point out that Glenn Beck is a partisan douche, and it's a flame-fest. Seriously, grow the F up.

I hope I'm not considered as one of those who criticized President Bush unfairly.

Right now I'm only mocking Obama, and sometimes other Democrats, similar to the way the Dems have been in a frenzy over Bush, Palin and who have you. Only I do with greater wit and intelligence, as most other do as well. Obama supporters are not hugely intelligent people and are easily ridiculed..

If that's the way the game is going to played, I'm quite prepared to play it.
 
This has to be one of the most absurd or dishonest statements I've ever seen at DP. If you like, I can go back to 2008 and post all the comments from conservatives on this board who, based on those comments, had no intention of given Obama any chance at all.

You're right. I should have said "almost everyone".

But of course many thought, and with apparent justification, that Barrack Obama was an inexperienced candidate who would prove to be an incompetent and dishonest President. As you can see, we have been proven right.
 
Since you have already admitted that you are part of the "tit-for-tat hyperpartisan club" your post is ironic.

Why is it 'ironic'?

As you say I am quite partisan, hyper of you want to use the word, but can sit here and respond as good as I get.

It's the goofy leftists who have to resort to charges of racism etc, in order to try and diffuse some of the charges against them and serve as a decoy to divert attention away from their own ineptness. Of course Barrack Obama was among the first to create this straw man argument in order to draw attention to his wonderful self and away from his platitudes disguised as platforms.

All I have to do is point out this craziness, and BHO is always offering up new opportunities.
 
What do you think should be done with the idiotic socialist liberals? Should they be incarcerated? Should they be deported? Should we just declare war on them until they are all dead?

This is the Left speaking, and they really seem to think in those terms.

Criticisms equals gulags. complaints against a politician is "hyperpartisanship".

It must have been their breakfast cereal they had as children, or something of that nature.
.
 
This is the Left speaking, and they really seem to think in those terms.

Criticisms equals gulags. complaints against a politician is "hyperpartisanship".

It must have been their breakfast cereal they had as children, or something of that nature.
.

Well, zimmer makes these liberals sound like enemies of the State. If someone is truly destroying the country it sounds like the perfect time for a revolution, no?
 
Well, zimmer makes these liberals sound like enemies of the State. If someone is truly destroying the country it sounds like the perfect time for a revolution, no?

Any 'revolution' will take place through the ballot box.

You are not at risk.
 
Any 'revolution' will take place through the ballot box.

You are not at risk.

But Obama is making us a socialist country. How can we be sure that there will be a ballot box?
 
Well, zimmer makes these liberals sound like enemies of the State. If someone is truly destroying the country it sounds like the perfect time for a revolution, no?
They are destroying the country. That debt load isn't from military spending it's social engineering. The loss of liberty, the suffocation of business, the Ponzi Schemes that are massive time bombs. It's not Conservative ideology that has generated this decay.

As for a revolution, yes. A peaceful one in November 2012.

http://www.usdebtclock.org/
....................

Poor zim. Every post you make you show off your ignorance on the issue. Remember when you first came here and I challenged you on the definition of socialism and you failed MISERABLY? I remember. You STILL haven't learned a thing.
Educate thyself:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...ypical-lib-but-dont-call-libs-socialists.html

You just spew your ignorant comments, nothing but hack statements that have no basis in reality.
More of your limited vocabulary again... Moderator roadkill.
Educate thyself: http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...ypical-lib-but-dont-call-libs-socialists.html

You act like one of those folks who gets brainwashed by some bizarre cult.
I have admitted, I was a Commi-Lib once. Years of reading and travel changed that. What's you excuse?

What you say makes perfect sense... to you... because you've been indoctrinated.
Educate thyself: http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...ypical-lib-but-dont-call-libs-socialists.html

Of course, not a bit of it has any real basis in reality. Keep talking, zim... and the rest of us will do what we do... laugh at the absurdity and irrelevancy of what you say.
ROTFLOL... you complain I'm a partisan, and you sing the same boring song off key every time you post. Have you nothing more to add?

I suggest Hooked on Vocabulary. Once you've become a cunning linguist and have graduated beyond hack, partisan hack and extreme partisan hack, your titillating trilateral, I suggest Politics for Dummies.

.
 
Last edited:
This has to be one of the most absurd or dishonest statements I've ever seen at DP. If you like, I can go back to 2008 and post all the comments from conservatives on this board who, based on those comments, had no intention of given Obama any chance at all.

I didn't want to give him a chance to spread the wealth around, close Gitmo, speak to enemies without preconditions, "fundamentally change America", raise Cap Gains, raise taxes, green jobs, ... No, no, no... I wanted to see this guy and the nut job Socialist Support Squad stopped and slowed as much as possible.

And in 2010 people realized what Change really meant. It meant incompetence on top of it all.


What do you think should be done with the idiotic socialist liberals? Should they be incarcerated? Should they be deported? Should we just declare war on them until they are all dead?

Defeated. If only Libs and their journ-O-list buddies would be as honest as Kucinich they'd accomplish this for the good of the nation... but they know what that would mean. They'd resemble Mondale and spell the end of the Socialists of Amerika Party (SAPs).

.
 
Last edited:
Bottom line is this: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. You are accomplishing NOTHING by throwing poo all the livelong day, here at DP. Nobody admires, respects or hears you. Okay - I take that back. Your fellow poo slingers maybe do. That's nothing to be proud of, either.
 
Bottom line is this: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. You are accomplishing NOTHING by throwing poo all the livelong day, here at DP. Nobody admires, respects or hears you. Okay - I take that back. Your fellow poo slingers maybe do. That's nothing to be proud of, either.

Well, no... that is not the bottom line.

The bottom line is there is a deep divide in this country. Some people pine for a socialist state modeled after France, Germany, Sweden, Finland and the like, taking elements of their failures some from village sized countries, others from medium sized states. Those in opposition understand the failures these systems have wrought. We want to stop it. We would like to return America to a country with limited government, states having more power, low taxation, individual liberty, a strong military, an impartial justice system (this might require Congress to have certain new powers unfortunately because the courts have become politicized since FDR), secure borders... and the like.

HUGE DIFFERENCES.

I see the Dem/Socialist Faktion as the problem. Their systems fail under the weight of corruption and inefficiency fairly quickly (just look at how fast we've ****ed ourselves with it), and it is irresponsible to saddle future generations with the bill for the existing parasitic system and its Ponzi/Madoff Schemes.

The problem is those that want to get along. Our Founders set up a system where we weren't supposed to get along, and where it took great might to move anything forward. Rightly so. Unfortunately we've had the courts politicized, dare I say perverted, and FDR was the first to breach the firewalls. Since then it's been massively downhill.

You can act like Rodney King, along with The Whiner in Chief CC... but I ain't bending to give space to watch Socialists destroy one more bit of America and run the bills through the roof on future generations of Americans. People should be ashamed, but it's just the opposite... they actually have the gall to demand even more. The depth of selfishness, of parasitic behavior is utterly disgusting.

.
 
Last edited:
Well, no... that is not the bottom line.
.

Yeah, it really really is. By the way, that's as far as I read. I'm not going to give you any more respect than you give me.
 
Legitimate criticism. That I can always accept, even if I disagree. Note, that I criticized both parties (R's in Minnesota, D's in the Senate).

What's ridiculous is this stupid little mistake that anyone can make is being called "absolute proof that he's not fit to be President." When are you guys going to get over people criticizing Bush? Two years later, and you're still stinging. "Ooh, those meanies on the internet and TV said mean things about poor, persecuted George." Really? These things became serious because Cons turned that into a flame-fest about the "liberal media." If you had just said "Yeah, that's a dumb flub, and it's pretty funny..." No. People joke about Palin, and it's a flame-fest. Point out that Glenn Beck is a partisan douche, and it's a flame-fest. Seriously, grow the F up.

More importantly, why are you defending a man clearly too small for the job you fools handed to him?

He's not only socially inept, he's too incompetent to put professional protocol advisors on his staff to help prevent those embarassing gaffes. How many simply "average" Americans would think it appropriate to give the Queen of England (or their own monthers) an iPod of his recorded speeches? Not very many.

How many Americans would think it's polite to speak, while in another nation, through that nation's playing of their national anthem, even if it does sound like My Country 'Tis of Thee, a song Obama never learned while going to schoool in Indonesia?

When should the President of the United States bow to a foreign national or religious leader? Only if he has to barf. Otherwise the correct answer is NEVER, EVER, not unless they're from Krypton and their name is Zod.

Obama mailed the bust of Churchill back to England, a gift given THE UNITED STATES in the wake of September, 11. The only plausible explanation is that Churchill had his alleged sperm-donor put in a Kenyan jail.

Obama gave as another present a stack of DVD's he picked up from Wal-Mart and which didn't work in Europe, anyway.

The man is incompetent, and doubly so for refusing to hire competent advisors.

The alternate is that he's being deliberately insulting to alientate our staunchest ally.

You can bet your ass that EVERY SINGLE MISTAKE and POSSIBLY DELIBERATE insult Obama makes should be dissected in detail. And your defense of His Gross Incompetenceness is something to entertain the Americans.
 
This has to be one of the most absurd or dishonest statements I've ever seen at DP. If you like, I can go back to 2008 and post all the comments from conservatives on this board who, based on those comments, had no intention of given Obama any chance at all.

He was given his fair chance.

But anyone so incompetent that he can't even be bothered to memorize the Oath of Office immediately earns the Greatest Boob of the Century Award and he is then judged forthwith from that basis.

Obama has succeeded in keeping unemployment in America at greater than 9%. How's that working for everyone?

Obama has succeeded in preventing the US from drilling it's own oil. How's that $4.00+ gallon gasoline working out for you? How's it helping the economic recovery?

How's that now-illegal war in Libya, a "war of choicee", to use the words of the Left, working for you people? Since the US is now supportin al qeada, do you want the US to lose this war as you on the left want the US to lose the other ones, or do you suddenly wish the US success?

Obama's plans, from the beginning, were obviously wrong, obviously detrimental to the well-being of the United States, and to the extent that they certainly were wrong and harmful, the Mayor, as did Rush Limbaugh and others, want him to fail.

The Mayor makes no apologies for wanting the United States to succeed, and, since that meant Obama must fail, for wanting Obama to fail.

Socialism is bad, boys and girls.

Bad, as in EVIL.

Bad, as in unAmerican.

Bad, as in the Mayor's children should not become the slaves of the nation's masters.
 
Since you have already admitted that you are part of the "tit-for-tat hyperpartisan club" your post is ironic.

No. The Mayor is an American.

Being strongly partisan in favor of America is the correct way to be.

Unless you're living somewhere else, and then the Mayor has pity for you.

Not bein pro-American, while living in America, makes one a fifth columnist or a traitor.
 
What do you think should be done with the idiotic socialist liberals? Should they be incarcerated? Should they be deported? Should we just declare war on them until they are all dead?

They should be extracted from elective office by the electorate and allowed to form their own communes.

It's what they keep pretending they want for the rest of us. We'll see if we can't find someone to donate them some soap once in a while.
 
I hope I'm not considered as one of those who criticized President Bush unfairly.

Right now I'm only mocking Obama, and sometimes other Democrats, similar to the way the Dems have been in a frenzy over Bush, Palin and who have you. Only I do with greater wit and intelligence, as most other do as well. Obama supporters are not hugely intelligent people and are easily ridiculed..

If that's the way the game is going to played, I'm quite prepared to play it.

BUT.....they don't have a sense of humor and are completely incapable, due to never growing up, of taking what they so readily hand out.

Remember, it was months before the late night "comics" started taking shots at Obama after his election. That only happens when Democrats are elected.
 
Why is it 'ironic'?

As you say I am quite partisan, hyper of you want to use the word, but can sit here and respond as good as I get.

It's the goofy leftists who have to resort to charges of racism etc, in order to try and diffuse some of the charges against them and serve as a decoy to divert attention away from their own ineptness. Of course Barrack Obama was among the first to create this straw man argument in order to draw attention to his wonderful self and away from his platitudes disguised as platforms.

All I have to do is point out this craziness, and BHO is always offering up new opportunities.

The Left only uses the term "hyper-partisan" to describe a person speaking effectvely against whatever left-wing lunacy they're bein told to defend this week, but can't.
 
Yeah, it really really is. By the way, that's as far as I read. I'm not going to give you any more respect than you give me.

NARROW MINDED LIB ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


How do you know I failed to give you "respect"? I answered your false statement and you prove too narrow to read it.
Your problem, and people like you are the problem.

You should try to read the book linked in my signature line... and see if you aren't product of what he wrote about.

.
 

NARROW MINDED LIB ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


How do you know I failed to give you "respect"? I answered your false statement and you prove too narrow to read it.
Your problem, and people like you are the problem.

You should try to read the book linked in my signature line... and see if you aren't product of what he wrote about.

.

Kool Aid drinkers will never want facts to interfere with their beliefs.

The threat of discovering that what they believe is based on lies is too frightful for them to contemplate.
 

I read the thread. More of your hyperpartisan overgeneralizations and lack of understanding. Nothing new and nothing relevant... as usual.


More of your limited vocabulary again... Moderator roadkill.
Educate thyself: http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...ypical-lib-but-dont-call-libs-socialists.html

Again, nothing but your inability to understand simple concepts through overgeneralization and hyperpartisanship brainwashing. Nothing new and nothing relevant... as usual.


I have admitted, I was a Commi-Lib once. Years of reading and travel changed that. What's you excuse?

As I said in another thread... you just switched from one brand of Kool-Aid to another. You were absurd in one direction... now you are absurd in the other. Seems like you learned little in your traveling and reading.


Educate thyself: http://www.debatepolitics.com/gener...ypical-lib-but-dont-call-libs-socialists.html

ROTFLOL... you complain I'm a partisan, and you sing the same boring song off key every time you post. Have you nothing more to add?

You offer nothing, zim. Same old brainwashed anti-liberal inaccuracies and fantasies. I haven't seen you post anything of substance in AGES. You're stuck in quicksand and seem quite happy to stay there. Post something relevant and accurate, and I'll respond in kind. Don't, and I will keep dismissing your arguments as exactly what they are... irrelevant and inaccurate.

I suggest Hooked on Vocabulary. Once you've become a cunning linguist and have graduated beyond hack, partisan hack and extreme partisan hack, your titillating trilateral, I suggest Politics for Dummies.

.

Poor zim. Yes, we know that I have thoroughly discredited you and your position over the past few months. Go look at your "DC" thread where I further demonstrated your complete and total hypocrisy and inability to see things clearly. It really was quite beautiful. :lol:
 
He was given his fair chance.

But anyone so incompetent that he can't even be bothered to memorize the Oath of Office immediately earns the Greatest Boob of the Century Award and he is then judged forthwith from that basis.

Obama has succeeded in keeping unemployment in America at greater than 9%. How's that working for everyone?

Obama has succeeded in preventing the US from drilling it's own oil. How's that $4.00+ gallon gasoline working out for you? How's it helping the economic recovery?

How's that now-illegal war in Libya, a "war of choicee", to use the words of the Left, working for you people? Since the US is now supportin al qeada, do you want the US to lose this war as you on the left want the US to lose the other ones, or do you suddenly wish the US success?

Obama's plans, from the beginning, were obviously wrong, obviously detrimental to the well-being of the United States, and to the extent that they certainly were wrong and harmful, the Mayor, as did Rush Limbaugh and others, want him to fail.

The Mayor makes no apologies for wanting the United States to succeed, and, since that meant Obama must fail, for wanting Obama to fail.

Socialism is bad, boys and girls.

Bad, as in EVIL.

Bad, as in unAmerican.

Bad, as in the Mayor's children should not become the slaves of the nation's masters.

Whenever the Mayor or anyone else uses the term "socialism" I know that they do not understand terminology and have no ability to assess things rationally. That's why the Mayor is part of the problem... but of course, the Mayor is so wedded to his position, the Mayor is completely unablity to grasp this.
 
No. The Mayor is an American.

Being strongly partisan in favor of America is the correct way to be.

Unless you're living somewhere else, and then the Mayor has pity for you.

Not bein pro-American, while living in America, makes one a fifth columnist or a traitor.

The Mayor has demonstrated that he is not for America. The Mayor has demonstrated that his main focus is beating the other guy. That is more important to the Mayor... and all the other hacks, left and right, than American is.

The Mayor also demonstrates that he has no idea what the term "un-American" means, but that is not surprising. Like other terms, the Mayor uses them based on his own absurd ideology, not on what they really mean.
 
Back
Top Bottom