Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

  1. #11
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:47 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,741

    Re: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

    Quote Originally Posted by spud_meister View Post
    If a guy is bullied because he's white, they'll investigate, if he's bullied because he's fat, they won't. Or do you think calling someone 'four-eyes' is worthy of an investigation by the DOJ?
    Smaller government.

    Except for when there's a talking point to be fabricated.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  2. #12
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Smaller government.

    Except for when there's a talking point to be fabricated.
    Yeah - I think that this 'bullying as a government concern' is off the mark - what's next, making it a felony?
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Seen
    07-25-13 @ 08:55 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,951

    Re: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    You see, people, the law only protects from discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or sex. White people can be discriminated against on basis of race too, you know. The DOJ doesn't "ignore" white people at all. (the article throws in the "overweight" red herring. an overweight black kid teased about his weight suffers the same issue)
    .
    ....it happens everyday....but according to Holder.....there hasnt been one act of discrimination against Honkeys in world history.

    Im sure in the 2012 elections, white people can show up at the polls with billy clubs without fear of prosecution.
    .
    .
    .
    .

  4. #14
    Dungeon Master
    anti socialist

    X Factor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Texas Proud
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 04:24 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    44,721

    Re: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    Yeah - I think that this 'bullying as a government concern' is off the mark - what's next, making it a felony?
    I agree, and I don't think any amount of government programs (or whatever they have in mind) will stop bullying. It's just a fact of life. Whatever happened to the time tested advice to just stand up to bullies? That, in my experience, is really the only thing that works.
    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.
    Mahatma Gandhi


  5. #15
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,401

    Re: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

    Quote Originally Posted by spud_meister View Post
    If a guy is bullied because he's white, they'll investigate, if he's bullied because he's fat, they won't. Or do you think calling someone 'four-eyes' is worthy of an investigation by the DOJ?

    I dont think, as i have stated wasting energy and time on bullying is worthy of an investigation anytime by the DOJ.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  6. #16
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,401

    Re: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Smaller government.

    Except for when there's a talking point to be fabricated.


    This post is what is called "dropping a duece"...


    Get back to me when your done building strawmen.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  7. #17
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    Yeah - I think that this 'bullying as a government concern' is off the mark - what's next, making it a felony?
    Possibly. Lots of things are now criminal.

    Quote Originally Posted by MyCentralJersey.com
    WOODBRIDGE — The chickens are coming home to roost for a couple of high school students who thought releasing live chickens into their school would make for a good senior prank last month.

    But instead of chuckling at the fowl play, angry Woodbridge High School officials called the police and this week suspended the four students, who are now facing criminal charges.
    Woodbridge High School chicken prank leads to suspensions, criminal charges | MyCentralJersey.com | MyCentralJersey.com


    What you're seeing is more government stepping in where Schools are concerned due to insurance concerns. This is why a zero tolerance policy exists - not because it makes sense but because the insurance risk of being sued by some parent is too high. The school enacts stupid policies, the government then feels it has to step in an inject themselves when, all that is needed is common sense. Something we as a people have lost in the past 30 years.
    “I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •