- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
according to the link...
Here's another site with a bunch of the same pictures.
The Best Fake Signs from Sarah Palin’s Tea Party Rally in Boston
You fail at trying to fail others.
Either way, those aren't people faking like they are part of the tea party lol. They are just there disagreeing. What is your point again?
whysoserious said:Either way, those aren't people faking like they are part of the tea party lol. They are just there disagreeing. What is your point again?
That Hatuey was 100% wrong saying the signs identified as being in Boston, were part of the 2010 John Stewart Rally for Sanity on the D.C. mall. Those pictures were actually from Boston as originally identified.
And can you prove those people were part of the tea party please? Some evidence would be nice.
That Hatuey was 100% wrong saying the signs identified as being in Boston, were part of the 2010 John Stewart Rally for Sanity on the D.C. mall. Those pictures were actually from Boston as originally identified.
And can you prove those people were part of the tea party please? Some evidence would be nice.
this.........
Either way, those aren't people faking like they are part of the tea party lol. They are just there disagreeing. What is your point again?
No, that's called a direct answer to your question. You asked what the point was, now you have the answer.Are you asking me to prove something?
Outside tea party events do not control who can enter, they don't sell tickets or check for a tea party ID. Therefore, your claim these people "weren't faking" they were part of the Tea Party is what you haveprove. Simply BEING at an event, for the reasons I've stated, does not automatically mean these people were part of the Tea Party.What do I need to prove? I see people with signs (possibly at a "Tea Party") that seem to be anti-Tea Party (aka anti republican). Therefore, whether at a "Tea Party" or at the Rally to Restore Sanity, they are clearly not people trying to pretend to be "Tea Partiers".
Interesting - so was that a typo? Did you mean these people "were faking" ??In fact, they are making it very clear that they are against the "Tea Party" movement.
B-I-N-G-O!, my point above stands.
Methinks you PWNED yourself.:lamo
Are you asking me to prove something? What do I need to prove? I see people with signs (possibly at a "Tea Party") that seem to be anti-Tea Party (aka anti republican). Therefore, whether at a "Tea Party" or at the Rally to Restore Sanity, they are clearly not people trying to pretend to be "Tea Partiers". In fact, they are making it very clear that they are against the "Tea Party" movement.
Cool, except that you brought it up first and made a false claim that these people were trying to pretend to be members of the group.
...even THAT doesn't claim that anyone was pretending to be members of the Tea Party.didn't certain left wings groups join TEA party rallies w/ obnoxious signs to try to discredit the TEA Party
Methinks you PWNED yourself.:lamo
now you're joining the 'full of ****' club that PB and Hautey started. Not in any post I made, did I claim these people were pretending to be members of the Tea Party... please go back and read my posts to verify this.
My bringing it up, was in direct response to this post...
...even THAT doesn't claim that anyone was pretending to be members of the Tea Party.
Both that post, and mine, discussed the bogus signs at the Tea Party ralley in Boston. Nothing else.
Like PB and Hautey before you....
fail.
It's really funny when you act like you meant exactly what another poster said, as if it isn't obvious that you could never come up with it on your own. This time though, I'm afraid you hitched your wagon to a falling star.B-I-N-G-O!, my point above stands.
Yeah, see everything you post, I have to be suspicious of... now look at the pictures backgrounds in the pictures you claim are from the John Stewart rally which was held on the National Mall, in Washington D.C. Since when are there brick buildings surrounding the National Mall? Answer - there aren't brick buildings surrounding the National Mall....
Your blind partisanship you wear on your sleeve makes refuting you waaaayyy too easy.
Your argument is weak son. VERY. Weak.
Question for you Hautey, were you at the Rally or the March? Do you spend a lot of time in DC? I was, and I do. I'm no expert, but I will say that the skyline in those original pictures look completely foreign to DC. We also have someone from Boston saying they look a bit like Boston. We also have a website directly suggesting their from Boston.
He should be ok, right? I mean, since the Leftists aren't violent, or anything like that. They should welcome with open arms and try to change his school of thought.
But, we know that **** ain't gonna happen. Don't we??
Whovian said:now you're joining the 'full of ****' club that PB and Hautey started. Not in any post I made, did I claim these people were pretending to be members of the Tea Party... please go back and read my posts to verify this.
My bringing it up, was in direct response to this post...
didn't certain left wings groups join TEA party rallies w/ obnoxious signs to try to discredit the TEA Party
...even THAT doesn't claim that anyone was pretending to be members of the Tea Party.
Both that post, and mine, discussed the bogus signs at the Tea Party ralley in Boston. Nothing else.
Like PB and Hautey before you....
fail.
How do you know they aren't part of the "Tea Party"? I think when you answer that, you'll answer your original question about whether they were faking or not.
When someone is pretending to be part of a group, the general idea is to assimilate in, not do exactly the opposite of everyone else there.
So now it's 'you don't know...' as opposed to 'you said that...'. Lame switch of point.
My point is... you accused me of making a claim... 'these people were trying to pretend to be members of the group'
...where I made no such claim. I never said they were, or were not pretending to be Tea Party members.
I have no idea if they were, or were not trying to pretend to be Tea Party members, and I never claimed that in any of my posts.
It's not my fault you make **** up and then refuse to go back to prove your made up **** by actually quoting a post you claim I made.
Once again.... fail on your part.
Your link did. Look at the title of the link you used. I would assume you agree with the link if you posted it? What is your overall purpose on this thread?
I don't really care one way or the other about this, but didn't certain left wings groups join TEA party rallies w/ obnoxious signs to try to discredit the TEA Party? I wasn't a member here then, but if I run a search looking for PB's outrage over that, wonder if I'd find anything. LOL
That never happened, some teacher in Oregon had that idea, it never went anywhere.
you're so full of ****, sometimes it's a little sad. It's happened in Boston and other places...
The Best Fake Teabagger Signs at the Boston Common Tea Party: Pics, Videos, Links, News
Once again, PB is proved to be a liar.
First, this was said:
Notice where it says left wing groups joined Tea Party rallies with signs to discredit the Tea Party rally.
Then, this was said:
To which you responded:
So, in essence, you called PB a liar because he said liberals did not try to join the Tea Party and discredit them with signs. And, as I have shown, they never tried to join any rally (at least the people in your signs). And please, notice your link.
The Best Fake Teabagger Signs at the Boston Common Tea Party: Pics, Videos, Links, News
What does that say? "The Best Fake Teabagger Signs at the Boston..."
It's cool, I forgive your insults.
which I repeatedly explained that I was responding to...but didn't certain left wings groups join TEA party rallies w/ obnoxious signs to try to discredit the TEA Party?
How does this...
which I repeatedly explained that I was responding to...
equal me saying people were pretending to be Tea Party members?
It doesn't. Essentially, you cannot prove I said it, because I didn't.
You lied.
Get over yer bad self, man up, show some nads and admit you were wrong. Very few here can/will think less of you for it.
So your post was completely irrelevent to the thread then? I don't understand what the hell your point is then? At least then, while wrong, you had a point. Now I don't know what's going on. It seems you are just bitching that people were protesting at a protest.