you were contradicting my statements with flat out falsehoods. I simply responded that you should check your facts because you were very far form being accurate. Instead of doing so, you continued to make false claims.Meanwhile, I was not rebutting your comment. I was responding to the conversation.
Unless, of course, you can find SOME way to make the claims found in posts 133, 135, and 137 factual.
I get irritated when I see people argue form a position of ignorance and then pretend that they weren't after getting called on it.Which I did not realize had already gotten pissy. My bad. I can see how pointing out the fact that it was all to do with Jones case and using the phrase "stems from" blew the pressure corker for you. Good day.