Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 55

Thread: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

  1. #21
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,966

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Comments about Sarah Palin can get her shot...

    However her rhetoric and comments can't get anybody else shot....

    I guess she has a monopoly on getting shot for what somebody says about her....

    That's like...

    Blood libel right?
    Hateful rhetoric inspires dangerous situations and atmospheres.

    Hateful rhetoric by palin can get a congresswoman shot.

    However, baseless comments regarding Palins culpability with regards to the tragedy in Arizona are perfectly okay.

    I guess the left has a monopoly on defining "hateful rhetoric" and "dangerous atmosphere" so that it only applies when its not referencing their own speech.

    I don't think the lefts rhetoric as a whole is "responsible" for her increased death threats, but I do find it hillariously hypocritical that they're sitting around condemning "hateful rhetoric" based off the tragedy in Arizona with no proof it had anything to do with it while now dismissing that they're doing so with hateful rhetoric could just as easily be linked with creating a "violent atmosphere" themselves.

    We must change the tone in this country!......by everyone on the right, we can keep being hateful.

  2. #22
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,966

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Not paritcularly Bubba. I'm asking for an actual QUOTE, not some random writeres paraphrase.

    Please, can you provide me an exact quote? A paraphrase is useless. I could paraphase that Obama suggested that one should "bring a gun" as a solution to political discourse by cherry picking a couple of words out of a quote, however when given the entire quote the meaning and context would change.

    So I ask, and challenge again, please...someone show me a quote of a Republican suggesting that second amendment remedies are a "solution".

  3. #23
    Sage
    Crosscheck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:05 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    6,474

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Someone is shock there would be threats against the Palins?

    They have entered the level of celebs and for most of their remaining lives that will always have to have body guards. They have the millions so what is the problem?

    Ever hear of Brittney Spears or Paris Hilton being attacked? No, because dim-witted as those two are even they know you have to have body guards.

    The more fame brought to Palin the more enticing it is to another nut such as the one in Arizona.

    Shooting someone such as Fred Gandy also a former politician and tv star would give them only a paragraph on the 3rd page of the newspaper. Shooting a Palin would be front page. Being a celeb with such controversy brings you to the top of the list by nuts.

    Being a celeb is a like a two edged sword.

  4. #24
    free market communist
    Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-30-17 @ 12:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    26,661

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Hateful rhetoric inspires dangerous situations and atmospheres.

    Hateful rhetoric by palin can get a congresswoman shot.

    However, baseless comments regarding Palins culpability with regards to the tragedy in Arizona are perfectly okay.

    I guess the left has a monopoly on defining "hateful rhetoric" and "dangerous atmosphere" so that it only applies when its not referencing their own speech.

    I don't think the lefts rhetoric as a whole is "responsible" for her increased death threats, but I do find it hillariously hypocritical that they're sitting around condemning "hateful rhetoric" based off the tragedy in Arizona with no proof it had anything to do with it while now dismissing that they're doing so with hateful rhetoric could just as easily be linked with creating a "violent atmosphere" themselves.

    We must change the tone in this country!......by everyone on the right, we can keep being hateful.
    If you wish to actually address hypocrisy, I would suggest you examine the behavior of those who make claims that they are rejecting "partisan hacks", but whose pattern of behavior is to indulge in attacks only against those criticizing Palin.
    "you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos

  5. #25
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,966

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by Gardener View Post
    If you wish to actually address hypocrisy, I would suggest you examine the behavior of those who make claims that they are rejecting "partisan hacks", but whose pattern of behavior is to indulge in attacks only against those criticizing Palin.
    Would I take advise on how to live a lawful life from a career thief?

    Then why do I care what you think is needed to address hypocrisy and "partisan hacks"? Especially when your "suggestion" is something I already know and have been actively doing.

    I would suggest you actually fairly examine my posting habits before making uninformed suggestions.

  6. #26
    free market communist
    Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-30-17 @ 12:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    26,661

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Would I take advise on how to live a lawful life from a career thief?

    Then why do I care what you think is needed to address hypocrisy and "partisan hacks"? Especially when your "suggestion" is something I already know and have been actively doing.

    I would suggest you actually fairly examine my posting habits before making uninformed suggestions.
    I am not a career thief, but thank you for the inuendo. Considering all your other personal attacks, I will just have to take this one in stride.
    "you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos

  7. #27
    long standing member
    justabubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:50 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    36,132

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Not paritcularly Bubba. I'm asking for an actual QUOTE, not some random writeres paraphrase.

    Please, can you provide me an exact quote? A paraphrase is useless. I could paraphase that Obama suggested that one should "bring a gun" as a solution to political discourse by cherry picking a couple of words out of a quote, however when given the entire quote the meaning and context would change.

    So I ask, and challenge again, please...someone show me a quote of a Republican suggesting that second amendment remedies are a "solution".
    let's see if you like this cite any better (i doubt it because it is still incriminating): Sharron Angle: “Second Amendment Remedies” | The State Column
    Last edited by justabubba; 01-13-11 at 11:26 AM. Reason: kant tpye
    we are negotiating about dividing a pizza and in the meantime israel is eating it
    once you're over the hill you begin to pick up speed

  8. #28
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,966

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
    let's see if you like this cite any better (i doubt it because it is still incriminating): Sharron Angle: “Second Amendment Remedies” | The State Column
    Ahh, thank you. An actual quote. And lets see what the quote is...

    Angle: I feel that the Second Amendment is the right to keep and bear arms for our citizenry. This not for someone who’s in the military. This not for law enforcement. This is for us. And in fact when you read that Constitution and the founding fathers, they intended this to stop tyranny. This is for us when our government becomes tyrannical…

    Angle: Well it’s to defend ourselves. And you know, I’m hoping that we’re not getting to Second Amendment remedies. I hope the vote will be the cure for the Harry Reid problems.
    Well my god, that is clearly her stating that we should use second amendment remedies as a "solution".

    ....wait, no its the exact opposite of that. Its her saying she hopes that the citizenry, because if you'll note she's speaking in far larger terms and scopes than a single individual acting, does not reach the point that they start acting upon "second amendment remedies".

    Now...call me crazy, but I'm not aware when the English language completely changed in meaning where suggesting that you hope something doesn't happen equates to suggesting that it SHOULD happen.

    The only way someone could think she's actually legitimately advocating for people to start shooting government officials would be for them to be crazy enough to ignore context, take notions literal, AND think she's suggesting the government IS tyrannical.

    The same could be said for comments suggesting that Sarah Palin created an atmosphere that helped cause the congresswomans death. Someone could hear that and rather than taking it in context (say, for instance, the person wasn't meaning Palin was LITERALLy responsible) believe that Sarah Palin is complicite in the murder of a federal judge and congresswomen and thus is guilty of a high crime against the country and action should be taken again her.

    Essentially....crazy people could look at hateful rhetoric and think crazy things and possibly do a crazy thing. That doesn't mean what the crazy person took it as is actually what was said or advocated for, at all.

    Stating you hope we don't reach a point in this country where citizens start shooting government officials is not the same as suggesting that shooting government officials is a solution people should take to political problems.

  9. #29
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,966

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by Gardener View Post
    I am not a career thief, but thank you for the inuendo. Considering all your other personal attacks, I will just have to take this one in stride.
    Of course you're not. See there are these things called analogies. Its similar to what you would find on SAT's. Remember the old..."Apple is to fruit as dog is to animal". Or "Guns::War as Whisks::Baking"

    In this case "How to live life lawfully is to Advise from a Career Criminal as How to address hyper partisanship is to Advise from a Hyper Partisan".

    Hopefully that helps clarify your confusion regarding the "innuedno" and your mistaken belief that somehow I was implying you're a career criminal.

    Its actually a similar type of style that could be used for this topic to show the illogic of some on the left currently with this.

    Somehow

    Hateful Rhetoric that is about the congresswomen is to enabling the death of this congresswomen

    is a legitimate view point for them yet somehow

    Hateful Rhetoric that is about Palin is to enabling the death threats against Palin

    is somehow NOT a legitimate view point to them.

    This, despite the fact that in both cases there is as much evidence to suggest that the "rhetoric" had anything at all, directly or indirectly, to do with the final action of one as there is the other.

    Astounding what analogies can show you. You learn something every day.

  10. #30
    free market communist
    Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-30-17 @ 12:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    26,661

    Re: Death Threats Against Sarah Palin at 'Unprecedented Level,' Aides Say

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Of course you're not. See there are these things called analogies. Its similar to what you would find on SAT's. Remember the old..."Apple is to fruit as dog is to animal". Or "Guns::War as Whisks::Baking"

    In this case "How to live life lawfully is to Advise from a Career Criminal as How to address hyper partisanship is to Advise from a Hyper Partisan".

    Hopefully that helps clarify your confusion regarding the "innuedno" and your mistaken belief that somehow I was implying you're a career criminal.

    Its actually a similar type of style that could be used for this topic to show the illogic of some on the left currently with this.

    Somehow

    Hateful Rhetoric that is about the congresswomen is to enabling the death of this congresswomen

    is a legitimate view point for them yet somehow

    Hateful Rhetoric that is about Palin is to enabling the death threats against Palin

    is somehow NOT a legitimate view point to them.

    This, despite the fact that in both cases there is as much evidence to suggest that the "rhetoric" had anything at all, directly or indirectly, to do with the final action of one as there is the other.

    Astounding what analogies can show you. You learn something every day.
    My own S.A.T score was 1460 taken in 1972 before it was changed to make the acheivement of higher scores easier. At that time, the score was high enough to place me well within the top 1/10th of 1 % of all those taking it, and was good enough to get me accepted to Stanford.

    How about you?
    "you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •