• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

In New York City, 41% of pregnancies aborted

Wasn't that camp in Coratia run by Muslims that were members of the Waffen SS? Oh, wait... :lamo

Haha! You're a revisionist troll who just got p4wn3d and is now too ***** to admit it. Thanks for playing.
 
Well, it's reality my friend. How ironic is it that a recent recipient of the, "Maggy", was a black woman that works for Planned Parenthood?

Whats this have to do with my post? lol
 
What a horrifyingly sick percentage that is. 41% of unborn children are killed in NYC. That's disgusting and wrong on so many levels.
 
Well, it's reality my friend. How ironic is it that a recent recipient of the, "Maggy", was a black woman that works for Planned Parenthood?

How ironic is it that our black president is a big supporter of PP and vice versa?
 
Abortion is our foreign policy?

No but the so-called pro-life movement claims to view all life is sacred but have no problem supporting mindless wars in where our troops and innocent foreign civilians get killed. Last time I checked human life doesnt have an asterisk.
 
How ironic is it that our black president is a big supporter of PP and vice versa?

Even more ironic, is how the, "everybody is a racist 'cept us", Liberals are big supporters of planned parenthood.
 
Who's forcing anyone to conceive children?

I suppose anyone who opposes birth control. Perhaps "unplanned parenthood" would have been a better phrase to be the opposite of "planned parenthood."
 
I suppose anyone who opposes birth control. Perhaps "unplanned parenthood" would have been a better phrase to be the opposite of "planned parenthood."

Obviously you're not familiar with the origins of Planned Parenthood.

Meet the founder of Planned Parenthood

307px-Woman_And_The_New_Race.png
 
Last edited:
I suppose anyone who opposes birth control. Perhaps "unplanned parenthood" would have been a better phrase to be the opposite of "planned parenthood."
I have no problem with birth control that prevents pregnancy.
 
I have no problem with birth control that prevents pregnancy.

Not so many years ago, that would have been seen as an ultra liberal stance. Do you remember when condoms had "for the control of diseases only" on them and when birth control for anyone was highly controversial? I do, and yes, I know that dates me some.

Anyway, I totally agree with birth control being made widely available, and information on it being dispensed to anyone who is interested, even to minors without parental consent. That alone would decrease abortion rates, probably more than simply outlawing the procedure. Here is an organization that is in the birth control business.
 
this is one of the saddest (and on another level, most disgusting) stories seen around here

even the most ardent apologists for abortion usually insist aloud that the procedure be SAFE, LEGAL and RARE

and, in this case, 2 outta 3 turns out tragic

as for planned parenthood, in late 2007 and early 2008 ucla students from the newspaper the advocate made "sting" style phone calls to pp, pretending to be donors who would contribute to sanger's association only if the money were used to abort blacks

An investigation, undertaken by students at the University of California at Los Angeles newspaper, The Advocate, revealed troubling responses from Planned Parenthood staffers when asked by an actor, posing as a “donor,” if he could earmark his contribution for abortions for “black babies” only.

In one example, Autumn Kersey, vice president for marketing at Planned Parenthood of Idaho, is asked whether a donation can be specified “to help a minority group … like the black community, for example.”

“Certainly,” Kersey says in a taped response in which she sounds genuinely encouraged by the offer. “If you wanted to designate that your gift be used to help an African-American woman in need, then we would certainly make sure the gift as earmarked for that purpose.”

The caller responds: “Great, because I really faced trouble with affirmative action, and I don’t want my kids to be disadvantaged against black kids. I just had a baby; I want to put it in his name.”

Kersey responds, “Absolutely.”

The "donor" proceeds to proclaim that “the less black kids out there the better,” followed by, “understandable, understandable,” by Kersey, who laughed as if he were joking.

“Excuse my hesitation, this is the first time that I’ve had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I’m excited and want to make sure I don’t leave anything out,” she is recorded saying.

Kersey's and other statements were culled from calls to Planned Parenthood clinics in six states. In each, the staff person answering the call expressed an interest in taking the donations despite the caller’s overtly racist commentary.

pp's response:

“A fundraising employee violated the organization’s principles and practices when she appeared to be willing to accept a racially motivated donation,” said the Idaho-based organization told the Idaho Statesman. “We apologize for the manner in which this offensive call was handled. We take full responsibility for the actions of the fundraising staff member who created the impression that racism of any form would be tolerated at Planned Parenthood. We took swift action to ensure that each of our employees understands their responsibility to communicate clearly with donors about the fact that we believe in helping all individuals, regardless of gender, race or sexual orientation, make informed decisions about their reproductive health care.”

Pastors Accuse Planned Parenthood for 'Genocide' on Blacks - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum - FOXNews.com

sorry to say

best wishes all, give your kids a hug, call em if they're outta state
 
Not so many years ago, that would have been seen as an ultra liberal stance. Do you remember when condoms had "for the control of diseases only" on them and when birth control for anyone was highly controversial? I do, and yes, I know that dates me some.
So that actually makes me a moderate. Who knew? :lol:

Anyway, I totally agree with birth control being made widely available, and information on it being dispensed to anyone who is interested, even to minors without parental consent. That alone would decrease abortion rates, probably more than simply outlawing the procedure. Here is an organization that is in the birth control business.
Contraceptives and sex ed have been widely available for some time now, yet it apparently has not reduced abortion rates. Makes you wonder if teaching teens how to have sex is really a good idea.
 
So that actually makes me a moderate. Who knew? :lol:

Contraceptives and sex ed have been widely available for some time now, yet it apparently has not reduced abortion rates. Makes you wonder if teaching teens how to have sex is really a good idea.

No one needs to teach teens how to have sex. They have a way of figuring it out on their own. The problem is teaching teens to have sex safely, while at the same time telling them that abstinence is still a better option. That last message is lost in modern media that depicts casual sex as the norm.

Teaching them the truth about STDs helps, except that teens seem to have "oh, it won't happen to me" attitude toward any sort of risk, from AIDS to car crashes.

Meanwhile, values are taught in the home, and the values taught by unprepared teen parents are likely to result in more teen parents. It's a vicious circle.

And the question becomes how to discourage abortion, while at the same time discouraging people who can't raise children from having them. There are no simple answers to that one, are there?
 
How ironic is it that our black president is a big supporter of PP and vice versa?

I find it frightening that ANY person would be a supporter of killing innocent human fetuses.
 
No one needs to teach teens how to have sex. They have a way of figuring it out on their own. The problem is teaching teens to have sex safely, while at the same time telling them that abstinence is still a better option. That last message is lost in modern media that depicts casual sex as the norm.

Teaching them the truth about STDs helps, except that teens seem to have "oh, it won't happen to me" attitude toward any sort of risk, from AIDS to car crashes.

Meanwhile, values are taught in the home, and the values taught by unprepared teen parents are likely to result in more teen parents. It's a vicious circle.

And the question becomes how to discourage abortion, while at the same time discouraging people who can't raise children from having them. There are no simple answers to that one, are there?

Very well thought posting. I too find the number in NYC shocking.

But have no idea why the Reps here claim PP is liberal driven to kill off democrat babies yet on other threads the Reps say the Dems want illegals in the US for more Dem voters.
Do those two thoughts even make sense?

So if PP is the Dems attempt to educate youth what is the Reps? Please don't say Bristol Palin's Abstinence Program as it didn't even work for her. But in reality I really doubt the Reps care about these people than other to use them for their political motives.
 
Not so many years ago, that would have been seen as an ultra liberal stance. Do you remember when condoms had "for the control of diseases only" on them and when birth control for anyone was highly controversial? I do, and yes, I know that dates me some.

Anyway, I totally agree with birth control being made widely available, and information on it being dispensed to anyone who is interested, even to minors without parental consent. That alone would decrease abortion rates, probably more than simply outlawing the procedure. Here is an organization that is in the birth control business.

And the first thing in your link listed under womens health is Abortions. That's the real business PP is in.


Methods of Abortion

They have even been caught taking donations from undercover people who specified they wanted the money to go to aborting a black baby.
 
So now that they have those numbers, maybe it's time to try and figure out why there's such a huge difference in the number of abortions depending on the demographics. There has to be a reason why Black women are having so many abortions compared to everyone else.
 
So if PP is the Dems attempt to educate youth what is the Reps?

healthy f-a-m-i-l-i-e-s

hello

tragically too few in new york, bringing great sorrow to many of us
 
Back
Top Bottom