2 - First, like it or not, there are a portion of abortions that are performed on women that simply do not want to take the responsibility of being a mother... to these women adoption is a better option. Otherwise, well, once humans become a disposable commodity society is in trouble, so it's not so much important WHO raises these children, but that these unborn children are at least given a chance.
Or we could always go with the Chinese option of forced abortions, forced sterilizations, etc...
3 - Can only speculate. The bigger issue though is the health of the women that get abortions... because if there is a flaw with the unborn baby, a woman's body can recognize the problem and then will have a miscarriage, when that happens the hormones adjust and cope. Different story if the baby is ripped out of the womb... the body doesn't know how to cope with there not being a baby to grow in the belly any longer... and well, if you get an abortion you might as well start drinking and smoking because your chance of getting cancer has increased drastically.
Ya.. let's have a war on pregnancies... why limit it to first term abortions?? You should be able to abort the child up to 5 years old. It's an 'unpleasant fact of life' that we kill our babies... so why stop while they are in the womb???Like I always say - unless we fix *all those other problems* abortion is an accepted although unpleasant fact of life.
Just like war, suicide and divorce.