• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supremes facing eligibility challenge to Obama, again

Touche, and yes...not to mention MM or Newsbusters or MRC.

THere are a bunch of "sources" of dubious value. You don't see me citing WDN or Newsmax. Then again I don't see you citing the Marxist Markos or the barking at the moon loonbirds at TruthOut either.
 
THere are a bunch of "sources" of dubious value. You don't see me citing WDN or Newsmax. Then again I don't see you citing the Marxist Markos or the barking at the moon loonbirds at TruthOut either.

I don't even read DU.
 
well since the military prosecutes AWOL and and awards honorable discharges the fact that BUsh was given the latter pretty much establishes he was not guilty of the former. How much of the main stream press questioned Bush about AWOL before he won the election versus members of the MSM who questioned Obama's rather evasive dealings with where he was born?

That is not the point and you darn well know it. You falsely equated the Obama birth ginned up controversy with the Bush AWOL story.
This is NOT a discussion about the merits of either but about the fact that there are nutjobs out there pushing this crap despite all evidence to the contrary.

YOU were the one who compared the two.

"evasive dealings"!?!?!?!? We have seen his official certificate of birth and the announcement in the Hawaii papers for heavens sake. Give it up man.
 
Last edited:
That is not the point and you darn well know it. You falsely equated the Obama birth ginned up controversy with the Bush AWOL story.
This is NOT a discussion about the merits of either but about the fact that there are nutjobs out there pushing this crap despite all evidence to the contrary.

YOU were the one who compared the two.

"evasive dealings"!?!?!?!? We have seen his official certificate of birth and the announcement in the Hawaii papers for heavens sake. Give it up man.

1) as usual your desire to attack what I have said comes from misunderstanding the point I was making

2) Official birth certificate? Okie Dokie

3) I couldn't care less about the issue-there are many good reasons why Obama should not have been elected to worry about something like this.

BBL time for junior's chess lesson
 
1) as usual your desire to attack what I have said comes from misunderstanding the point I was making

2) Official birth certificate? Okie Dokie

3) I couldn't care less about the issue-there are many good reasons why Obama should not have been elected to worry about something like this.

BBL time for junior's chess lesson

Then why did YOU bring up the false comparison in the first place?

You may not want to tell junior that his teacher was just checkmated in three moves.
 
Last edited:
Then why did YOU bring up the false comparison in the first place?

You may not want to tell junior that his teacher was just checkmated in three moves.

I guess you cannot figure out that they are similar in the sense they were both idiotic ways of attacking a candidate
 
Then why did YOU bring up the false comparison in the first place?

You may not want to tell junior that his teacher was just checkmated in three moves.

you couldn't beat me in checkers let alone chess. and my kid would beat you too
 
why is it so hard for people to believe he was born in America? His mom was American.. If both his parents were foreign, I might understand these people more.. but his mother raised him. He even wrote a book about his life, and how he grew up in America.. lol. I doubt he would spend that much time making up a big lie about his entire life..
 
I guess you cannot figure out that they are similar in the sense they were both idiotic ways of attacking a candidate

You have a real talent for totally and completely missing the point. Of course, you do so intentionally in an attempt to save face. The idea that one garners less than one-half of one percent of the what the other does renders your silly comparison to the trashbin of debate.
 
you couldn't beat me in checkers let alone chess. and my kid would beat you too

More breast beating and macho boasting. Its pathological I tell you.
 
You have a real talent for totally and completely missing the point. Of course, you do so intentionally in an attempt to save face. The idea that one garners less than one-half of one percent of the what the other does renders your silly comparison to the trashbin of debate.

again, my logic tortured as it is poured through the acid filled sponge of babel known as Haymarket's interpretation.
 
More breast beating and macho boasting. Its pathological I tell you.

Get a life dude. :lamo and stop pretending to be a shrink.:mrgreen:
 
again, my logic tortured as it is poured through the acid filled sponge of babel known as Haymarket's interpretation.

actually its a simple Google search done by putting both through the process. My interpretation never entered into it. It was pure fact and figures - which we know from experience are rarely the friend of right wing ideology.
 
Get a life dude. :lamo and stop pretending to be a shrink.:mrgreen:

It is pathological - just like your need to save face by engaging in hollow mockery.
 
actually its a simple Google search done by putting both through the process. My interpretation never entered into it. It was pure fact and figures - which we know from experience are rarely the friend of right wing ideology.

logic is to leftwing "feelings" as sunlight is to count dracula
 
It is pathological - just like your need to save face by engaging in hollow mockery.

why would I need to save face? your certainly aren't bothering me and i have stain proof trousers and boots
 
why would I need to save face? your certainly aren't bothering me and i have stain proof trousers and boots

Personal bladder problems no doubt.
 
Obama's citizenship has been verified.

It staggers me how many people still don't know this.

Then there will be no problem in 2012 even if states pass laws that say your citizenship must be verified.
He's already done that at least once.
 
You are a complete moron if you think the NSA, CIA, FBI, DoD and every other major national defense organization that handles classified information has not verified Obama's background.

I'm not a complete moron. If the CIA, FBI, DoD, NSA and every other national defense organization verified Obama's credentials BEFORE he was elected, why don't they just come forward???
 
Personal bladder problems no doubt.

well you might have a point, the crap you post causes me to laugh so hard that I almost piss myself!
 
I'm not a complete moron. If the CIA, FBI, DoD, NSA and every other national defense organization verified Obama's credentials BEFORE he was elected, why don't they just come forward???

It is often said that a coverup is worse than the actually malfeasance. Why was it so hard for Obama just to come out and put an end to the speculation? Its the same with his college records.. he was so pround (and justifiably so) to point out he was a Harvard Law Magna and president (though mainly a popularity contest) of the law review (despite never having a note published which, according to those of us who have been to law school is rare) yet he refuses to discuss his record at occidental or Columbia (where he did not graduate with even honors)
 
I'm not a complete moron. If the CIA, FBI, DoD, NSA and every other national defense organization verified Obama's credentials BEFORE he was elected, why don't they just come forward???

Because they don't pay attention to stupid claims by stupid people.
 
Because they don't pay attention to stupid claims by stupid people.

A free people has every right, actually a duty, to ask questions. If there is a formal vetting process in place for members of Congress, the President, Vice President, and other government officials to assure the country that these people satisfy the qualifications of office, it is reasonable to expect that that information would be made instantly public. Fact is, we don't have a formal vetting process. And how ridiculous is that???

BTW, I believe he is a citizen. I argue the point only because the system is flawed.
 
Because they don't pay attention to stupid claims by stupid people.

Do you believe those of us who thought Obama was a joke of a candidate are "stupid"?
 
Why is Turtledude's kid in the conversation?

3377488092_f8d4d8a258.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom