- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 3,595
- Reaction score
- 1,259
- Location
- Kentucky
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Come the famine, the skinny people will be sorry they aren't fat.....
Hmm this is sort of true I guess.
Come the famine, the skinny people will be sorry they aren't fat.....
Come the famine, the skinny people will be sorry they aren't fat.....
Nope, because they can hunt the fat people :mrgreen:
Nope, because they can hunt the fat people :mrgreen:
No hunting of fat people within 500 yards of a Kentucky Fried Chicken store...Nope, because they can hunt the fat people :mrgreen:
No hunting of fat people within 500 yards of a Kentucky Fried Chicken store...
No it's not. Unless you have some other explanation, as to why after decades of banking practices all these bankers started making bad loans, one day; loans that they knew wouldn't go to term. It wasn't until after CRA had passed.
And, no, "because they're all greedy", isn't an explanation.
You see I have brought my points to this thread though and they were not enough for you. You tell me I am insulting you, but you use terminology with insulting insinuation towards other forum members, myself included.
Let me reiterate what I have brought up on this thread, and other threads with similar subject manner, so that you can deny it has any point once again:
-Palin is an idiot and will attack anybody just so someone pays attention to her. She is a whore.
Calling a woman a whore because you disagree with her politically is low class. just sayin... I mean if you want to be all sexist about it, that's your call.
No it's not. Unless you have some other explanation, as to why after decades of banking practices all these bankers started making bad loans, one day; loans that they knew wouldn't go to term. It wasn't until after CRA had passed.
And, no, "because they're all greedy", isn't an explanation.
Calling a man "limp and impotent" for criticizing her politics is low class and sexist, but that is Palin's call, too. If she is going to dish it out, then she should expect to get the same in return.Calling a woman a whore because you disagree with her politically is low class. just sayin... I mean if you want to be all sexist about it, that's your call.
Wow a graph that shows federal spending that doesn't take into account inflation, and that nearly all of that spending you are showing, shows that no matter what the party, they have all pretty much been assholes the past 25 years.
They were forced to give loans to people that can't afford them. When it came to minorities they were sued for not giving loans to them that they couldn't possiblity afford several times. This lead to them doing just that, but because the loan was trash and they knew it, they decided to give them higher interest rates. This is what everyone got of all races that couldn't afford what they were getting. High interest loans, but like I said, they had no choice.
As for your other claims here, sorry, but why don't you have links for them when you have a link for the above?
I don't think anyone really thinks we're not spending too much money. But the real disagreement is over what we're spending it on. For example, I want us to stop spending so much money killing brown people. You probably want us to stop spending money on public services and assistance for the poor. Which in turn leads to more dead brown people. Really it all comes down to how many brown people you want in the world.
I want to government to be stuffed into the little box it was intended to be in. I want the spending to be Constitutional in nature. Socialist redistribution isn't in there.
Defense, war and national security... they are permitted under the Constitution.
As for brown people... I don't care what color terrorists come in. They need be stopped, offed if need be.
When it comes to these First Ladies interests... they need not be funded by government and government departments that should be shut or drastically cut. Just Say No could have been funded by the private sector. Of all the First Ladies interests, this message was probably the most memorable and effective.
.
The 'Just Say No' message was effective? We thought is was simplistic and useless in my crowd. It certainly did not work.
It was hoped to be effective, it had all the components of a successful program....
First, the slogan easily fit on a bumper sticker, second, the first lady was a respectable republican.
What Mrs. Obama needs is respect from the right for making an attempt, but that isn't going to happen. Next thing you know, the ubercons will be dissing the family dog for being a foreign breed...not yet naturalized, and with a suspect birth certificate....
Yep, its much easier to repeat 'Just Say No' a lot than it is to convey that the traditional western diet is garbage to your system.
The 'Just Say No' message was effective? We thought is was simplistic and useless in my crowd. It certainly did not work.
Palin's makin all our kids fat.... Damn moose girl!
I haven't read the entire thread, so I am confused..
Do those of you siding with Palin 100%, think NOTHING should be done about childhood obesity?
I haven't read anything to the contrary, but I thought I'd ask and give the benefit of the doubt.