I'm laughing at her gaffe. I'm not "attack"ing her. And she made herself an issue when she accepted the nomination in 2008. It has nothing to do with me or anyone else other than her and whoever it was on McCain's staff that thought she was worthy of nomination.
So is it possible to laugh at the actions of your own side, or is that far too dangerous to even contemplate?
I find it funny that people still argue that Palin is qualified to be president. She quit. She plays the victim ad nauseum, and she is an idiot.
I didn't vote for Obama. But I'm even less likely to vote for Palin.
Everybody in politics slides the responsibility to somebody else...
And as somebody running the financial and tax aspects of a family owned business, I don't think my skills have anything to do with the president's job. I build spreadsheets, keep ledgers, and write checks. I am not reading complicated laws, writing laws, in charge of other people's lives, declaring war, or managing international diplomacy. There are no similarities.
If any leadership position is more like running the government, it's being a military leader.. not a business exec.
It certainly seems to be headed in the direction of the bail outs being paid back.
Now back to my question
I wonder how the people at GM feel about his policies?
Tough choice, Palin vs. Obama? Hmmm, what to do? Palin hands down for me.
So what???Yet she was more qualified that Obama
Doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
Since you do of course support socialism.
Since she was the governor of a socialist state.
Not surprising that you don't understand states rights
Yet she was more qualified that Obama
Tough choice, Palin vs. Obama? Hmmm, what to do? Palin hands down for me.
irregardless
I disagree. Obviously we have different ideas of what qualifies one for president.
If that's what your decision would be, why the nonsense about qualifications? Regardless of what qualifications Obama had when he was elected originally, he is beyond any shadow of a doubt more qualified, resume-wise, for the office of president right now than Palin is because now he does have the occupation of POTUS on said resume.
Palin's resume, however, has the unfortunate "quitter" label attached to it.
So let's not play up the old talking points that had little to no value when they were originated, let alone today and admit that the only qualification that is really being looked at is the label, howeever inaccurate, of conservative being attached to one of the candidates in question.
BEcause if you'd vote for Palin over Obama now, it's clear that qualifications (i.e. experience) are not being considered.
Ok, I'll bite, what exactly did obama do that qualifies him to lead a 14.5 trillion dollar economy? I apparently put a lot more faith in someone who actually had budget, personnel, capital project, etc responsibilities to someone who was a Community Agitator. Seems the results we have today indicate just how little he knew about the private sector and leadership in general. He loves the perks but not the responsibility of the job.
To those with Obama Derangement Syndrome, everything is about Obama. :shrug:is this thread about obama?
Ok, I'll bite, what exactly did obama do that qualifies him to lead a 14.5 trillion dollar economy?
To those with Obama Derangement Syndrome, everything is about Obama. :shrug:
Why do you hate America?that's why i can't talk with him. about anything.
and it's not like there isn't LEGITIMATE criticism to offer about obama.
Why do you hate America?
I apparently put a lot more faith in someone who actually had budget, personnel, capital project, etc responsibilities to someone who was a Community Agitator.[/QUOTE]He has led that economy. Palin has not. Ergo, he's more qualified than she is.
Ok, I'll bite, what exactly did obama do that qualifies him to lead a 14.5 trillion dollar economy? I apparently put a lot more faith in someone who actually had budget, personnel, capital project, etc responsibilities to someone who was a Community Agitator. Seems the results we have today indicate just how little he knew about the private sector and leadership in general. He loves the perks but not the responsibility of the job.
Yes, he has, right over the cliff, 4 million more unemployed today than when he took office and that number is completely understated as it does not count business owners that have gone out of business and contract employees who had their hours or work cut. He has added 3 trillion to the debt in two years. He bailed out teacher unions by saving state responsibility teacher jobs and has done absolutely nothing to promote the private sector and has the lowest economic growth one year after a recession ended than any other President in office after a recession.
Palin ran a city and a state. Obama does have those responsibilities now and the results show that he was unqualified for that position.