• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bobby Jindal hammers Barack Obama in new book

I don't think Mr. Rogers "hammers" anyone.






Purrrrrs


As has been pointed out, liberals seem to love good speeches and ignore actual results. Results matter, not the speeches. What is it going to take for people like you to admit that you were wrong? Obama results, 4 million more unemployed since the stimulus plan was signed and the recession ended, 3 trillion added to the debt, massive expansion of govt., and incrementalism towards a single payer healthcare system which is socialism?
 
As has been pointed out, liberals seem to love good speeches and ignore actual results. Results matter, not the speeches. What is it going to take for people like you to admit that you were wrong? Obama results, 4 million more unemployed since the stimulus plan was signed and the recession ended, 3 trillion added to the debt, massive expansion of govt., and incrementalism towards a single payer healthcare system which is socialism?

It's not nice to throw cold water on sleeping people. Makes them all 'uppity' and stuff :ninja:
 
The exit polls that I saw showed over 50% of voters saying that Obama's policies were at least part of the reason that the economy has not recovered, with more actually saying those policies had done more harm than good than said the opposite. This election was a huge repudiation of Obama.

Of course, Obama and Pelosi think its just a communication problem ......... hey, add up these numbers 65 + 6 + 7 + 680 ...... that's not communication math !!!

Keeping telling yourself that....that's not what the exit polling said....but if it makes you feel better....
 
Eighty Deuce said:
The exit polls that I saw showed over 50% of voters saying that Obama's policies were at least part of the reason that the economy has not recovered, with more actually saying those policies had done more harm than good than said the opposite. This election was a huge repudiation of Obama.

Of course, Obama and Pelosi think its just a communication problem ......... hey, add up these numbers 65 + 6 + 7 + 680 ...... that's not communication math !!!

Keeping telling yourself that....that's not what the exit polling said....but if it makes you feel better....

I think it's closer to 30%.
 
I am pretty sure that if the Republicans ran "Dilbert" in 2012 against this empty suit he would win.

Do it then - nominate Palin.
 
Do it then - nominate Palin.

If you voted for Obama then you voted for a lesser candidate than Dilbert and the results show. I would take Palin in a heartbeat of the empty suit we have now.
 
I think it's closer to 30%.

Well, from the exit polls put up for Axelrod to respond to, yesterday, a transcript:

AXELROD: Well, listen, I don't think the question is moving left, right or center. The question is whether we can work together to move this economy forward, Chris, and that's what the president wants to do.


I think it's very clear the American people elected us and elected this Congress to try and work together on the problems of this country. I was dismayed when Senator McConnell said that the most important thing that he has in front of him in the next two years as the leader of the caucus is to defeat the president.


There'll be plenty of time for elections later. This ought to be a season for cooperation in terms of pushing our economy forward, job creation, steadying the middle class, and laying the groundwork for a better future. And that's what we want to work on with Republicans and Democrats.


WALLACE: Well, you know, there is this debate about what voters were actually saying on election day. As I understand it, the president's explanation is that the voters were saying two things -- one, that the economy didn't turn around fast enough, and two, that he and all of you didn't do a good enough job explaining his policies.


But that's not what the exit polls said, and I want to put a couple of them up on the screen. Fifty-two percent said Mr. Obama's policies will hurt the country. Forty-three percent said they will help. And 56 percent said government is doing too many things better left to businesses and individuals. Thirty-eight percent said government should do more.


Mr. Axelrod, this was not a failure of communication. This was a repudiation of the president's policies.


AXELROD: Chris, there is a volume of research, and I can make a variety of points off of exit poll and other research. But the bottom line is this. The American people have gone through a very difficult time.


We walked into the greatest recession since the Great Depression. People have taken a terrible beating out there. There are millions of people still looking for work. And even though we stopped the free fall and we've had 10 straight months of positive job growth, and even though our economy is growing, we need to accelerate that growth. And I think that is fundamentally what the American people want us to work on.


WALLACE: You don't think they were saying that there's been too many...


AXELROD: And they want us -- and they want to us work together to do it.


WALLACE: If I may -- if I may, David, you don't think that they're -- the country was saying -- voters were saying there's been too much big government, too many 2,000-page bills, too much spending, too much intrusion?


AXELROD: Well, I have no doubt that people are concerned about spending. But they're fundamentally concerned about their jobs, Chris, and they want to see robust job creation, and they want to see this country strengthen its economy and grow. And that's what we want as well.


So I think that's fundamentally the message, and that's what the president is going to be focused on.

more here: David Axelrod on 'Fox News Sunday' - FOXNews.com

The video is available as well. If you are going to post up a number, or even correct another poster, how about some links ? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Well, from the exit polls put up for Axelrod to respond to, yesterday, a transcript:



The video is available as well. If you are going to post up a number, or even correct another poster, how about some links ? Thanks.

No need to be a smart ass... I'm on your side. The number I got was from CNN. I'll look for the link again.
 
No need to be a smart ass... I'm on your side. The number I got was from CNN. I'll look for the link again.

I watched the interview yesterday, and saw the numbers posted. I expect we can find a plethora of exit numbers where changing a few words produced a whole different response. It was the Dems who first grabbed the silly numbers to try to make it look like it was not a repudiation. The biggest whitewash of a lifetime was not a repudiation ! In the era of instant communication and all knowledge virtually at our fingertips, and its a "communication problem" according to the libs.

FYI, I am equal opportunity when folks undermine my numbers without some linked basis of their own. :)
 
Being hammered by Jindal must feel like a vicious assault by a grumpy gummi bear.
 
you, um.. DO realize you failed in the post I commented on, to link to your numbers, right ;)

Look, my original post what not in response to you. It was in response to what I then quoted, which was an unsubstantiated claim without a number, much less a source. I am not going to put a link to every fact that I put up. No one here does, lest we be linking every sentence. However, if and when I do challenge someone else's "fact", I will document. That's pretty much forum SOP.

OBTW, I have taken the time to adequately document my source, which shopws that my numbers have a solid basis. Now, how about you ? ;)
 
Look, my original post what not in response to you. It was in response to what I then quoted, which was an unsubstantiated claim without a number, much less a source. I am not going to put a link to every fact that I put up. No one here does, lest we be linking every sentence. However, if and when I do challenge someone else's "fact", I will document. That's pretty much forum SOP.

OBTW, I have taken the time to adequately document my source, which shopws that my numbers have a solid basis. Now, how about you ? ;)

someone needs a cookie and a nap. relax.
 
Being hammered by Jindal must feel like a vicious assault by a grumpy gummi bear.

Jindal has a 70+% approval rating in the state of Louisiana compared to less than 40% for President Obama. Guess hammering the President works in La.
 
Being hammered by Jindal must feel like a vicious assault by a grumpy gummi bear.

Obama said he got "shellacked", so there was no hammer. Heckuva brush though :)
 
Dude.....its LOUISIANA......Doh!
And your point is? Our state has problems but isn't nearly as close to bankruptcy nor does it have as high of an unemployment rate as say........California and Michigan. Who runs those states again? Oh yeah, it's those "superior intelligence" possessing "progressive" nanny staters. DOH!
 
Jindal's ok, Chris Christie is the next hope though.
I tend to agree. Even though Bobby Jindal is my governor he isn't nearly as strong in action about fiscal conservatism as Christie is. That being said though Jindal is probably the best governor of La. at least in my lifetime.
 
and Christie is a perfect role model for obese youth.
 
Back
Top Bottom