Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 145

Thread: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

  1. #71
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 12:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,536
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    Please stop lying about me.


    TED,
    Not a liberal, and not defending the oppression of women, thanks.
    When you defend Islam in your mild way, you're essentially supporting the barbarizing of their women. Islam states that the woman is possesion to the male. Why do you think so many atrocities happen to women under Sharia from rape, being fully-covered in garb, beatings, and stonings? I have read instances where Islamic men killed their women who were trying to divorce them. You cannot disprove those facts.

  2. #72
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:38 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,608

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    You're absolutely right, if Oklahomans feel the need to piss to mark their territory, that's their business, just like it's perfectly reasonable to call them on their silliness.



    Insofar as it is within the authority of the state to do so, yeah. That authority doesn't make such a specification reasonable by its nature.



    Yes, absolutely, any judge at any time could completely ignore common sense and go off the rails.

    That's why there's an appeals process.
    You're acting as though this is the first time anyone ever limited the jurisdiction of a court or what it may consider because a court went "off the rails." Happens quite a bit, actually. Jurisdictions are changed; rules of procedure are changed; standards of evidence are changed. These things are not always simply left to the appeals process. And the whole point of statutes in the first place is to define exactly what a court can and can't decide, and to overrule a court which the legislature or the people think has stepped out of line. This goes back a thousand years.

    This is but one single example, in response to an actual incident.

    Given that this will not affect contract law, arbitration, or probate, but it will prevent a judge from doing what the NJ judge did, what's your specific objection again? Or is this simply "oh noooz! It's ISLAMOPHOBIA!!!!"
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  3. #73
    Shankmasta Killa
    TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western NY and Geneva, CH
    Last Seen
    08-30-15 @ 04:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,444

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by Wake View Post
    When you defend Islam in your mild way, you're essentially supporting the barbarizing of their women.
    No, I'm not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wake View Post
    Islam states that the woman is possesion to the male. Why do you think so many atrocities happen to women under Sharia from rape, being fully-covered in garb, beatings, and stonings? I have read instances where Islamic men killed their women who were trying to divorce them. You cannot disprove those facts.
    I have never, not once, defended these sorts of abuses.

    Please stop lying about me.
    I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.

    Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.

  4. #74
    Shankmasta Killa
    TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western NY and Geneva, CH
    Last Seen
    08-30-15 @ 04:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,444

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    Given that this will not affect contract law, arbitration, or probate, but it will prevent a judge from doing what the NJ judge did, what's your specific objection again? Or is this simply "oh noooz! It's ISLAMOPHOBIA!!!!"
    If this amendment does not affect contract law, arbitration or probate, then it's completely asinine and yet another example of modern political correctness.

    Once again, it proves that Muslims really are the new niggers.
    I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.

    Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.

  5. #75
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 12:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,536
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    No, I'm not.



    I have never, not once, defended these sorts of abuses.

    Please stop lying about me.
    Do you defend Islam and all it entails or don't you?

  6. #76
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 12:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,536
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    Once again, it proves that Muslims really are the new niggers.
    That's dumb. Black people don't take their faith to the extreme by consistently trying to kill us. Consistently it is the Islamist (not all Muslims, just those that follow Islam in its entirety), that try to kill us.

  7. #77
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:38 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,608

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    If this amendment does not affect contract law, arbitration or probate, then it's completely asinine and yet another example of modern political correctness.

    Once again, it proves that Muslims really are the new niggers.
    OK, so you ignore the actual case they had in mind, which pretty much exempted someone from raping a woman because Sharia says it's OK for him to do so, and then go on to make a snarky comment which shows that yes, for you, it is indeed "OOOOOH NOOOOOZ! IZLAMOPHOBIA!!!!! ZOMG!!!"

    Oh, well.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  8. #78
    Sage


    MaggieD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Chicago Area
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    43,243
    Blog Entries
    43

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    If this amendment does not affect contract law, arbitration or probate, then it's completely asinine and yet another example of modern political correctness.

    Once again, it proves that Muslims really are the new niggers.
    That's just plain nasty. Jews have the same kinds of arbitration and mediation panels in the U.S. -- and have for many many years.

    Look, you're either going to support the Constitution of the United States, or you're not. Freedom of religion doesn't only apply when you "like" another's beliefs.
    The devil whispered in my ear, "You cannot withstand the storm." I whispered back, "I am ​the storm."

  9. #79
    Global Moderator
    Truth will set you free
    digsbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Metro Washington DC
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    18,990

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Separation of church and state means we can't have Sharia law for the sake of Islam. However, those who follow Sharia have every right to vote and have their morals placed into law.
    When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates
    Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.

  10. #80
    Sage


    MaggieD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Chicago Area
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    43,243
    Blog Entries
    43

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by digsbe View Post
    Separation of church and state means we can't have Sharia law for the sake of Islam. However, those who follow Sharia have every right to vote and have their morals placed into law.
    Separation of church and state means we can't forbid people from entering into contractual agreements to decide their civil disputes while taking Sharia (or Jewish or any other) beliefs into account. As long as no law is violated, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it.
    The devil whispered in my ear, "You cannot withstand the storm." I whispered back, "I am ​the storm."

Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •