Page 7 of 15 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 145

Thread: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

  1. #61
    Guru
    Councilman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Riverside, County, CA.
    Last Seen
    11-04-11 @ 10:16 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,454
    Blog Entries
    10

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by Manc Skipper View Post
    Then why not admit it?
    You make no sensese at all, but that is expected.

    Thanks for showing Leberals are as you have just proved them to be.

    You should take a bow. Really.

  2. #62
    Shankmasta Killa
    TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western NY and Geneva, CH
    Last Seen
    08-30-15 @ 04:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,444

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    The United States has a civil code. That is the only laws that should be followed in contractual matters. Which the Oklahoma law will enforce.
    I started to explain to you how you have no idea what contract law is, and then I decided it wasn't worth the keystrokes.

    Contract - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.

    Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.

  3. #63
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 12:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,536
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    Excellent job of mixing slander with your fear and hate.
    This is the kind of crap I'm talking about. Liberals defending Islam even though under Islamic rule women are oppressed.

    See what I mean??

  4. #64
    Shankmasta Killa
    TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western NY and Geneva, CH
    Last Seen
    08-30-15 @ 04:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,444

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    What it WILL prevent is a situation where someone wants the court to ignore the law and decide a legal matter on the basis of Sharia -- as in, screw contract law altogether, the Koran says this is a binding agreement and we want the court to enforce it. That, I would think, would be opposed by anyone who purports to favor secular government.
    It would also be illegal to begin with. This amendment was not required if that's all that was desired. The way this reads, courts won't be allowed to consider "Sharia law" period, whether the point of "Sharia law" in question contradicts the law of the land or not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    So, if Sharia law says "this is a valid will," but actual probate law says it isn't, or if someone wants an intestate man's estate to be divvied according to Sharia law instead of long-standing probate law, then too bad, so sad -- Sharia loses. And that's the way it ought to be. Do you disagree?
    Of course I agree, but if all that was desired was that "Sharia law" not be considered supreme above the law of the land, this amendment was not required.
    I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.

    Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.

  5. #65
    Shankmasta Killa
    TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western NY and Geneva, CH
    Last Seen
    08-30-15 @ 04:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,444

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by Wake View Post
    This is the kind of crap I'm talking about. Liberals defending Islam even though under Islamic rule women are oppressed.

    See what I mean??
    Please stop lying about me.


    TED,
    Not a liberal, and not defending the oppression of women, thanks.
    I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.

    Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.

  6. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Seen
    02-13-13 @ 12:05 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    18,536
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Under Sharia law thieves get their hands cut off; I damn well actually witnessed that on YouTube.

    What if in America once Sharia is supposedly brought in the liberal way, what happens if the thief doesn't want his hands cut off? There would be Sharia Law courts in America... how would those judged under those courts find refuge from such oppression? Would they easily be able to be tried under normal, humane American courts?

    Furthermore, when can we start bringing in Buddhist courts? Mayhaps a Wiccan court as well?

  7. #67
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,544

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    It would also be illegal to begin with. This amendment was not required if that's all that was desired. The way this reads, courts won't be allowed to consider "Sharia law" period, whether the point of "Sharia law" in question contradicts the law of the land or not.
    It wouldn't ever have to if it's just arbitration. I already explained that.


    Of course I agree, but if all that was desired was that "Sharia law" not be considered supreme above the law of the land, this amendment was not required.
    I already pointed out the NJ rape case where apparently THAT judge didn't quite get it.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  8. #68
    Shankmasta Killa
    TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western NY and Geneva, CH
    Last Seen
    08-30-15 @ 04:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,444

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    It wouldn't ever have to if it's just arbitration. I already explained that.
    If that's true, what the hell is the point of the amendment (aside from Oklahomans pissing to mark their territory, that is)?

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    I already pointed out the NJ rape case where apparently THAT judge didn't quite get it.
    That's an example of a judge that needed to be removed from the bench, not an example of where it needed to be clarified that "Sharia law" is trumped by the law of the land.
    I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.

    Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.

  9. #69
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:34 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,544

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by TacticalEvilDan View Post
    If that's true, what the hell is the point of the amendment (aside from Oklahomans pissing to mark their territory, that is)?
    That's up to OK. The NJ case was specifically cited as a motivation -- not something they wanted any of their own judges to do. This is perfectly within the purview of any state, to define exactly what a court's jurisdiction is and what it may consider.



    That's an example of a judge that needed to be removed from the bench, not an example of where it needed to be clarified that "Sharia law" is trumped by the law of the land.
    Well, that's funny, because such a clarification is exactly what the appeals court did. And apparently, this judge did in fact need it.

    But the appeals court could have gone along with it, and then the NJ Supreme Court could have, too. It didn't happen, but it could have.

    Now, in OK, there's no chance of it happening.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  10. #70
    Shankmasta Killa
    TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Western NY and Geneva, CH
    Last Seen
    08-30-15 @ 04:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,444

    Re: Muslim Activist Group Suing Oklahoma for banning Sharia/Islamic LAW

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    That's up to OK.[
    You're absolutely right, if Oklahomans feel the need to piss to mark their territory, that's their business, just like it's perfectly reasonable to call them on their silliness.

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    The NJ case was specifically cited as a motivation -- not something they wanted any of their own judges to do. This is perfectly within the purview of any state, to define exactly what a court's jurisdiction is and what it may consider.
    Insofar as it is within the authority of the state to do so, yeah. That authority doesn't make such a specification reasonable by its nature.

    Quote Originally Posted by Harshaw View Post
    Well, that's funny, because such a clarification is exactly what the appeals court did. And apparently, this judge did in fact need it.

    But the appeals court could have gone along with it, and then the NJ Supreme Court could have, too. It didn't happen, but it could have.

    Now, in OK, there's no chance of it happening.
    Yes, absolutely, any judge at any time could completely ignore common sense and go off the rails.

    That's why there's an appeals process.
    I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.

    Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.

Page 7 of 15 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •