• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Massive Muslim inbreeding over 1,400 years may have ruined gene pool

However, Muslims stand united in excusing Muslim atrocities.

This is just false. Go down to your local mosque and ask for opinions on muslim atrocities. Their opinions will resemble the those of ordinary christians in reguard to the lynching of blacks or the murder of abortionists.
 
Like I said, I agree with you, Sharia governed countries need to evolve. Any true "liberal" would agree that women shouldn't be second class citizens and democratic governments that ensure equal rights and freedom of religion through a comprehensive secular constitution is best.

Maybe we should leave it there to be civil and end on a positive.



Wow, we have this notion over here that the English tend to be more civilized, tolerant and more educated than us.

But as I say, Liberals can't help themselves but hypocritically smear and denigrate their political opponents. They have some neck, having spent some time lambasting the poor little inferior fellow for (apparently) doing the same towards Islamofascists!
 
Last edited:
And here I am thinking you actually had a position to defend.

I have, as all I wrote previously deals with. But if you yourself admit that heat will be made instead of light, I'll take up your offer to cut our losses.
 
Quacks are not biologists or geneticist.

Psychologists are scholars of human behaviour. I would imagine he'd have an interest.

If he was a psychiatrist, a doctor of the human mind, he would have less business to comment.
 
What would a psychologist know about genetics?

I seriously doubt inbreeding drives aggression in the Islamic world. Marrying first cousins was comparatively common in the West until a couple hundred years ago, and negative consequences of inbreeding tend to be acute rather than generalized. That Muslims have been allowed to marry first cousins a couple generations more isn't decisive. Furthermore, cultural conditioning is sufficient to explain the hostile responses seen in the Muslim community.

Why did you have to go and bring some actual facts and intelligence into this discussion? lol.
 
Having been to West Virginia, I can confirm that inbreeding leaves its mark on the collective psychology.
 
At face value, the notion that Muslims are inbred is utterly silly. Last I heard, the world's population of Muslims is a multiple of that of Christians. Who's swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool now?
 
At face value, the notion that Muslims are inbred is utterly silly.

Only to one who is profoundly ignorant of the rates of consanguinity throughout the world.
 
The election of Rand Paul calls to question the rates of consanguinity in Kentucky.
 
At face value, the notion that Muslims are inbred is utterly silly. Last I heard, the world's population of Muslims is a multiple of that of Christians. Who's swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool now?

Arab Muslims have the highest rate on consanguinity, followed by the Islamic areas of Africa...

Rate of Consanguinity:

cousin_3.gif


Coincidentally...

muslim_World2000.jpg
 
It's disgusting the FRANCE is counted as part of the Muslim world on that map.

But nobody can claim they weren't warned....
 
You're like a broken record at this point. There's a list of Christian atrocities equally long. Christians are EVIL!!!1!


But of course, Christians are just vile:

Number of suicide bombers: 0
Number of terrorists 0
Number of Inbred Christinas: 0

Hmm. So Christians are evil? Please, by all means, remind us of all the atrocities Christians have done.
Of course the Crusades are going to be in there, but let me just begin by saying that Christians HAVE NO REASON FOR FEELING GUILTY ABOUT THE CRUSADES.
IMPERIALIST ISLAM WAS TAKING OUR LANDS AND WE WERE FIGHTING TO GET THEM BACK. WE NEVER TRIED TO TAKE YOUR LANDS, WE SIMPLY WANTED OUR LANDS THAT YOU WERE OCCUPYING BACK. SO PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS WAS IN ANY WAY "EVIL"?
Also, since violence is inherent in your 'religion' (and I use the term loosely) any Christian that behaves in an unChristian manner connot be a Christian, it's as simple as that. Jesus Christ said that we are to imitate Him, and that the Holy Spirit would enable us to do so. Anyone acting in a hateful or violent manner simply does not have the Holy Spirit and therefore is not a Christian.
That is the big differrence between true godliness and lawlessness. The man of God will not commit heinous sins like pedophilia or murder.
In fact, the "fruits of the spirit" are listed in the Bible and Jesus said "you can tell a tree by it's fruit":
"The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control; against these things there is no law."

I would have to say that Islam is antithetical to Christian values.
And you can get all this informtion in Galatians 5:22-23.

Can you name me just ONE of those 'fruits' that is displayed by Muslims? I debate them regularly, and the most I can get out of them are ad hominem attacks or the mentioning of the Crusades, which was ARE NOT ABOUT TO APOLOGISE FOR.

Oh, and the Catholic priests that you like to bring up are NOT CHRISTIAN. Jesus Christ said he came to be our High Priest, thus doing away with the priesthood. Catholics and Chrisitans are two different things.

Could we please have that list of atrocities?
 
That map is going to be changing drastically when we get Osama out of the White House, be advised.
 
Somebody said there is no inbreeding in the Christian world...

Are all hillbillies atheist? :2wave:
 
Somebody said there is no inbreeding in the Christian world...

Are all hillbillies atheist? :2wave:

Ah -- the hypocrisy.

If one out of a million Americans are the product of inbreeding they are called hillbillies. If one out of three Arabs are such, they are defended for it.
 
Somebody said there is no inbreeding in the Christian world...

Are all hillbillies atheist? :2wave:

I lived in rural Tennessee, and my neighbours were all transplanted from L.A. and New York becuase it's so gorgeous there. All professional people, too, like myself.
I don't know any hillbillies, and if there are inbred hillbillies they are sinning against God. (But I surely never have seen or met any)
Unless you can point out some specific hillbillies I don't think there are any left. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT INBREEDING LEADS TO BIRTh DEFECTS.

So THAT'S your litany of all the heinous evils Christians have done? And you STILL haven't proved that there are inbred hillbillies?

Nice try though. :doh
 
Moderator's Warning:
This thread is being monitored closely, and all participants are warned to mind their manners carefully. Discuss the topic, not each other. Avoid inflammatory statements that might be considered trolling. Don't respond to flaming/trolling: report it instead. This is a sensitive topic and should be handled carefully, like dynamite.
 
But of course, Christians are just vile:

Number of suicide bombers: 0
Number of terrorists 0
Number of Inbred Christinas: 0

Hmm. So Christians are evil? Please, by all means, remind us of all the atrocities Christians have done.
Of course the Crusades are going to be in there, but let me just begin by saying that Christians HAVE NO REASON FOR FEELING GUILTY ABOUT THE CRUSADES.
IMPERIALIST ISLAM WAS TAKING OUR LANDS AND WE WERE FIGHTING TO GET THEM BACK. WE NEVER TRIED TO TAKE YOUR LANDS, WE SIMPLY WANTED OUR LANDS THAT YOU WERE OCCUPYING BACK. SO PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THIS WAS IN ANY WAY "EVIL"?
Also, since violence is inherent in your 'religion' (and I use the term loosely) any Christian that behaves in an unChristian manner connot be a Christian, it's as simple as that. Jesus Christ said that we are to imitate Him, and that the Holy Spirit would enable us to do so. Anyone acting in a hateful or violent manner simply does not have the Holy Spirit and therefore is not a Christian.
That is the big differrence between true godliness and lawlessness. The man of God will not commit heinous sins like pedophilia or murder.
In fact, the "fruits of the spirit" are listed in the Bible and Jesus said "you can tell a tree by it's fruit":
"The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control; against these things there is no law."

I would have to say that Islam is antithetical to Christian values.
And you can get all this informtion in Galatians 5:22-23.

Can you name me just ONE of those 'fruits' that is displayed by Muslims? I debate them regularly, and the most I can get out of them are ad hominem attacks or the mentioning of the Crusades, which was ARE NOT ABOUT TO APOLOGISE FOR.

Oh, and the Catholic priests that you like to bring up are NOT CHRISTIAN. Jesus Christ said he came to be our High Priest, thus doing away with the priesthood. Catholics and Chrisitans are two different things.

Could we please have that list of atrocities?

That's a very convenient argument, Christians can do no wrong because anyone who does wrong is not a Christian. And then go further to state the entire Catholic Church is not really Christian, well jeez just who do you count as Christian? Not Orthodox Christians either I imagine?
How about another Bible passage for you. Romans 12:19 "Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord."
I'd ask you to show me in the Bible where God gives anyone the power of judgment over another.
 
Last edited:
Ah -- the hypocrisy.

If one out of a million Americans are the product of inbreeding they are called hillbillies. If one out of three Arabs are such, they are defended for it.

Well.. that is what happens when you stereotype..

I am sure some Muslims have inbred.. but the Muslim world is so big, it's not necessary. I know there is inbreeding in Amish communities because it's a small population. On top of that inbreeding was once pretty common in general. Bach, Edgar Allen Poe, Hitler, and Einstein were all reportedly inbred or married one of their cousins..
 
Priests aren't Christian.. that is news

julietsm which church do you belong to?
 
Actually, the map Hateuy posted reflects accurate statistics as generated from demographic studies.

No stereotyping involved, only facts.
 
Back
Top Bottom