Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 4-year-olds can be sued

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Seen
    01-13-11 @ 10:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    685

    4-year-olds can be sued

    4-year old children can be sued and held responsible in civil courts in the US now. This is crazy.

    Citing cases dating back as far as 1928, a judge has ruled that a young girl accused of running down an elderly woman while racing a bicycle with training wheels on a Manhattan sidewalk two years ago can be sued for negligence.

    “A parent’s presence alone does not give a reasonable child carte blanche to engage in risky behavior such as running across a street,” the judge wrote. He added that any “reasonably prudent child,” who presumably has been told to look both ways before crossing a street, should know that dashing out without looking is dangerous, with or without a parent there. The crucial factor is whether the parent encourages the risky behavior; if so, the child should not be held accountable.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/29/nyregion/29young.html

  2. #2
    Sage
    CriticalThought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    18,125

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    I think Jean Piaget and Erik Erikson just rolled over in their graves.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Seen
    03-12-11 @ 09:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,922

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    ...And to think scumbag lawyers and bonehead judges give benefits of the doubt to muggers, thugs and killers!

  4. #4
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    This is really not as controversial as some people are making it sound. If you're younger than 4, you're presumed not to have the mental capacity to be negligent. Above 4, you can be negligent. I think there's another age cutoff for intentional acts.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Seen
    03-12-11 @ 09:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,922

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    Oh yeah, you're real mature and know what you're doing at 5 years old!

    (Probably why they're taught how to have sex in some schools and can be found swearing like dockers too!)

  6. #6
    Professor
    Travelsonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:20 AM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    1,376

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    Quote Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
    This is really not as controversial as some people are making it sound.
    Oh really? And how do arbitrary age markers set - to admission on PRESUMPTION - a good gauge for that?
    Nationalism in high dosages may be hazardous to your health. Please consult a psychiatrist before beginning a regular regimen, and if feelings of elitism and douchbaggery continue, discontinue immediately before you become unable to do so on your own.

  7. #7
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    Quote Originally Posted by Travelsonic View Post
    Oh really? And how do arbitrary age markers set - to admission on PRESUMPTION - a good gauge for that?
    Presumption that someone should be allowed to argue that a 4 year old was capable of being negligent =/= presumption that the 4 year old was negligent.

    This is a threshold issue, not a decision on the merits.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  8. #8
    Cheese
    Aunt Spiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sasnakra
    Last Seen
    09-10-16 @ 06:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,433

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    I think it's legitimate.

    She did die, after all - yes, not *directly* related to her injuries but it's quite common for one injury to open the door to many other ailments that lead to death in the elderly. Aside that - it DID fracture her hip and force her to go through surgery. *That* is a liability in itself - regardless of whether or not she eventually died.

    Sidewalks, by the way, are NOT for biking on - they are for WALKING on.

    I support the action - NOT necessary against the youth but their parents (who it should be directed against) to recoup the medical bills and other such costs that arose.

    To suggest that this child or her parent couldn't be held liable for the injuries THEY caused would, then, lead to other situation in which a child - injured on a playground at school or in a fight - might not have legitimate legal recourse.
    These other incidences between children happen *all the time* - and often lead to negotiations which might involve one parent paying the medical bills for the injured child if so ordered or decided.

    If you've dealt with (directly or indirectly) commons issues such as: pets injuring others, your children injuring other children - and so on - and you feel those common issues are valid - then you should, also, support this ruling (I certainly do - and I've paid my share of dental and other bills).
    A screaming comes across the sky.
    It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.
    Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow

  9. #9
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    Quote Originally Posted by Aunt Spiker View Post
    I think it's legitimate.

    She did die, after all - yes, not *directly* related to her injuries but it's quite common for one injury to open the door to many other ailments that lead to death in the elderly. Aside that - it DID fracture her hip and force her to go through surgery. *That* is a liability in itself - regardless of whether or not she eventually died.

    Sidewalks, by the way, are NOT for biking on - they are for WALKING on.

    I support the action - NOT necessary against the youth but their parents (who it should be directed against) to recoup the medical bills and other such costs that arose.

    To suggest that this child or her parent couldn't be held liable for the injuries THEY caused would, then, lead to other situation in which a child - injured on a playground at school or in a fight - might not have legitimate legal recourse.
    These other incidences between children happen *all the time* - and often lead to negotiations which might involve one parent paying the medical bills for the injured child if so ordered or decided.

    If you've dealt with (directly or indirectly) commons issues such as: pets injuring others, your children injuring other children - and so on - and you feel those common issues are valid - then you should, also, support this ruling (I certainly do - and I've paid my share of dental and other bills).
    Just to be clear, this ruling isn't about whether the child is in any way responsible for what happened. The only thing that this judge was addressing is whether a negligence action could even be brought against someone who was over 4 years old.

    The question of whether or not the child was responsible (and if so, for what) will be addressed later.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Seen
    03-12-11 @ 09:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,922

    Re: 4-year-olds can be sued

    Sidewalks, by the way, are NOT for biking on - they are for WALKING on.
    I can see the logic in that. If the kid was cycling on the road then we'd have seen the PERPETRATOR face the danger and not the VICTIM!

    And if the kid did get killed then at least there wouldn't have been a long and fruitful lost life to mourn! I mean, what can a kid achieve at 4 years old?!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •