And yes, you do have to look at the entire information, and that is exactly what I've asked you to. If you remove the conflicting information, the doubted information, you have the Clinton NIE. That NIE reached a different conclusion.
And you have to look at the assessment of the CIA that Saddam was not likely to hadn off or use any wmds he had with the popssible exacption of if we invaded. So, according to them the threat was greater if we invaded than if we didn't.
And no matter what you're interested in, the problem is not with the intel, but with how the president used it and misrepresented it. neither you nor Cohan actually address that.