You come off as the end all and be all on what actually happened in this case... when the FACT is you don't have a clue as the the facts behind his motivations, those of his union, etc... any more that I have a clue.
I argue a possibility... I am willing to accept the 'possibility' either way, while you argue as if your word is 'fact', and beyond contestation. You have no interest in 'discussion' or 'debate'... all you seem to care to do is explain to everyone that you are correct and everyone else is wrong.
I feel sad for you.